projetos

Leave to appeal granted for questions on FFH preliminary assessment

BVerwG 7 B 14/16, 7 B 14/16 (7 C 24/17)Bverwg / Division 710 de jul. de 2017Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint and allowed the revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance: whether an omitted or defective FFH preliminary assessment can constitute a procedural error under § 4(1) no. 3 or § 4(1a) UmwRG. The decision contains only the leave-to-appeal ruling and an ancillary statement on the statutory basis for the amount in dispute.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal on the basis of fundamental importance: revision may be admitted where the proceedings are likely to clarify whether an omitted or defective FFH preliminary assessment can constitute a procedural defect within the meaning of § 4 Abs. 1 no. 3 or § 4 Abs. 1a UmwRG. It is sufficient that the question is capable of clarification in the revision proceedings; a conclusive substantive answer is not required at the admissibility stage (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 7 B 14/16, 7 B 14/16 (7 C 24/17), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-07-10

Aktenzeichen: 7 B 14/16, 7 B 14/16 (7 C 24/17)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:100717B7B14.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 4 Abs 1 Nr 3 UmwRG, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, 6. Juli 2016, Az: 2 L 84/14, Urteilvorgehend VG Halle (Saale), 30. Juni 2014, Az: 2 A 49/14 HAL

Spruchkörper: 7. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; FFH-Vorprüfung

Gründe

1 Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und inwieweit eine unterlassene oder fehlerhafte FFH-Vorprüfung einen Verfahrensfehler im Sinne von § 4 Abs. 1 Nr. 3 oder Abs. 1a Umweltrechtsbehelfsgesetz - UmwRG - begründen kann.

2 Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG. Für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental importanceFFH assessmentprocedural errorenvironmental legal remedies

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be allowed because of the fundamental importance of the legal question on an omitted or defective FFH preliminary assessment as a procedural error under § 4(1) no. 3 or § 4(1a) UmwRG.

Decisão extraída

Revision was allowed because the case is capable of clarifying whether and to what extent such an omission or defect can amount to a procedural error under the Environmental Legal Remedies Act.

Fundamentação extraída

The court found the question to be of fundamental importance within the meaning of § 132(2) no. 1 VwGO and suitable for clarification in revision proceedings.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.