projetos

Revision admitted on 4% interest for deferred repayments

BVerwG 2 B 70/16, 2 B 70/16 (2 C 1/17)Bverwg / Divisão 223 de jan. de 2017Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision limited to the legal question whether, given the historically low interest rate environment, a 4% interest rate may still lawfully be charged on deferred repayment claims. The court noted that there was no supreme-court authority on the issue and that the higher administrative courts had answered it differently. The decision concerns the admission of revision only; no merits ruling on the underlying claim was made.

Sumário Omnilex

Art. 132 VwGO; admission of revision for a question of fundamental significance: where no highest-court authority exists and the lower appellate courts are divided, revision is to be admitted if the legal question concerns the continued permissibility of a fixed 4% interest rate on deferred repayment claims in a prolonged low-interest environment. The existence of divergent case law among higher administrative courts supports the need for clarification by the Federal Administrative Court (consid. 1-2).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 2 B 70/16, 2 B 70/16 (2 C 1/17), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-01-23

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 70/16, 2 B 70/16 (2 C 1/17)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B2B70.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 20. Juli 2016, Az: 1 A 795/14, Urteilvorgehend VG Düsseldorf, 19. Februar 2014, Az: 10 K 9026/12

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Gründe

1 Die Revision ist hinsichtlich der Frage zuzulassen,

ob angesichts des historisch niedrigen Zinsniveaus eine Verzinslichstellung des gestundeten Betrags von 4 % zulässig ist.

2 Zu der Frage, ob es auch angesichts der derzeitigen langjährigen Niedrigzinsphase noch zulässig ist, einen Zins in Höhe von 4 % für die Stundung von Rückzahlungsforderungen zu erheben, gibt es bislang keine höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung. Die Frage wird unter den Oberverwaltungsgerichten unterschiedlich beurteilt (vgl. OVG Weimar, Urteil vom 12. November 2015 - 2 KO 171/15 - juris Rn. 33 einerseits, OVG Münster, Urteil vom 24. Februar 2016 - 1 A 335/14 - juris Rn. 75 ff. andererseits).

3 Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Werts des Streitgegenstandes für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

revision admissioninterest ratedeferred paymentlow-interest environmentdivergent case lawadministrative litigation

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be allowed on the legality of charging 4% interest on a deferred repayment amount in a period of historically low interest rates.

Decisão extraída

Revision was allowed on this legal question because it has not yet been decided by a supreme court and is treated inconsistently by the higher administrative courts.

Fundamentação extraída

There is no existing highest-court case law on the issue, and the higher administrative courts have reached divergent conclusions.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.