Revision admissible for entitlement to company shareholdings

BVerwG 8 B 44/16, 8 B 44/16 (8 C 5/17)Bverwg / Division 823 de jan. de 2017Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s complaint against non-admission of revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance under the Property Act: whether entitlement can be established for company shareholdings when the company had its seat outside the accession area at the time of dispossession. The court therefore allowed the revision under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO and made a provisional cost assessment for the revision proceedings.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance of a case concerning entitlement under §§ 1 Abs. 6, 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG for shareholdings in companies with seat outside the accession area at the time of expropriation; revision is to be admitted where the proceedings promise clarification of an unresolved question of general significance. The admissibility threshold is met when the legal issue is capable of principled clarification in the revision proceedings (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 8 B 44/16, 8 B 44/16 (8 C 5/17), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-01-23

Aktenzeichen: 8 B 44/16, 8 B 44/16 (8 C 5/17)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B44.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 1 Abs 6 VermG, § 3 Abs 1 S 4 Halbs 2 VermG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Berlin, 28. Januar 2016, Az: 29 K 54.15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

Gründe

1 Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental significanceproperty restitutioncompany shareholdingsaccession area

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be granted due to fundamental significance concerning entitlement for company shareholdings under the Property Act

Decisão extraída

Revision was to be allowed because the case raises the fundamental question whether entitlement can be established for company shareholdings where the company had its seat outside the accession area at the time of dispossession.

Fundamentação extraída

The appeal was admissible and well-founded under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO, since the proposed revision would likely clarify an unresolved question of general importance under Sections 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 half-sentence 2 VermG.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.