projetos

Revision admitted on entitlement to company shareholdings

BVerwG 8 B 43/16, 8 B 43/16 (8 C 4/17)Bverwg / Division 823 de jan. de 2017Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s complaint and allowed revision. It held that the case has fundamental significance because it is not yet clarified whether, under the Restitution Act, entitlement may be established for shareholdings in companies whose seat was outside the accession area at the time of the damage. The court also provisionally set the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for clarification of restitution entitlement to company shareholdings: Revision is to be allowed where the case presents a question of fundamental significance that is unresolved in the higher-court case law and likely to arise in the revision proceedings. This applies in particular to the question whether, on the basis of § 1 Abs. 6 and § 3 Abs. 1 sentence 4 half-sentence 2 VermG, a right to restitution may be established for shareholdings in companies which had their seat outside the accession area at the time of the damage. The provisionally set amount in dispute follows the GKG rules cited by the court.

Texto completo

BVerwG — 8 B 43/16, 8 B 43/16 (8 C 4/17), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-01-23

Aktenzeichen: 8 B 43/16, 8 B 43/16 (8 C 4/17)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B43.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 1 Abs 6 VermG, § 3 Abs 1 S 4 Halbs 2 VermG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Berlin, 28. Januar 2016, Az: 29 K 16.15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

Gründe

1 Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental significancerestitution lawcompany shareholdingsaccession areaamount in dispute

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be admitted for the question whether, under §§ 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 half-sentence 2 VermG, entitlement can be established for shareholdings in companies that had their seat outside the accession area at the time of the damage.

Decisão extraída

Revision is admitted because the question has fundamental significance and is likely to arise in the revision proceedings.

Fundamentação extraída

The case raises an unresolved legal question of general importance concerning the scope of the restitution statute for company shareholdings with a seat outside the accession area at the time of the harm.

Questão jurídica principal

Provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Decisão extraída

The amount in dispute is provisionally set under the GKG provisions cited by the court.

Fundamentação extraída

The court based the provisional value assessment on the statutory rules governing court fees and amount in dispute.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.