projetos

Leave to appeal on fire-service opt-out rule

BVerwG 2 B 94/15, 2 B 94/15 (2 C 34/16)Bverwg / Divisão 227 de set. de 2016Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal in a dispute concerning fire-service shift work and the conditions for a member-state opt-out allowing voluntary overtime beyond 48 hours per week. The court found that the complaint raised a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO, namely what requirements Article 22(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC sets for such an opt-out rule. No substantive merits ruling on the underlying employment dispute was made.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Art. 22 Abs. 1 RL 2003/88/EG: Revision is to be admitted where a complaint raises a question of fundamental significance requiring clarification in the revision proceedings. This is the case, in particular, where the appeal presents an unresolved question on the requirements of a member-state opt-out clause permitting voluntary work beyond the 48-hour weekly limit in fire-service shift work. For admissibility, it suffices that the legal question is capable of contributing to the development or clarification of the law; a merits assessment is not yet required (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 2 B 94/15, 2 B 94/15 (2 C 34/16), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-09-27

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 94/15, 2 B 94/15 (2 C 34/16)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:270916B2B94.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: Art 22 Abs 1 EGRL 88/2003

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg, 1. Juli 2015, Az: OVG 6 B 23.15, Urteilvorgehend VG Potsdam, 11. September 2013, Az: 2 K 2814/13

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an eine mitgliedstaatliche "Opt-out"-Regelung für freiwillige Mehrarbeit im Feuerwehrdienst über eine Arbeitszeit von 48 Wochenstunden hinaus

Gründe

1 Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der von der Beschwerde aufgeworfenen Frage beizutragen, welche Anforderungen an eine mitgliedstaatliche "Opt-out"-Regelung für freiwillige Mehrarbeit (Schichtarbeit) im Feuerwehrdienst über eine Arbeitszeit von 48 Wochenstunden hinaus nach Maßgabe von Art. 22 Unterabs. 1 der RL 2003/88/EG (EU-Arbeitszeitrichtlinie) zu stellen sind.

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental importanceworking timefire serviceopt-outovertimeEU directive

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be admitted for reasons of fundamental importance concerning an opt-out rule for voluntary overtime in fire service work beyond 48 hours per week.

Decisão extraída

Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance and may clarify what requirements Article 22(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC imposes on a member-state opt-out rule for voluntary extra work in fire service.

Fundamentação extraída

The court held that the complaint raised a legally significant and unresolved question on the design of an opt-out under the EU working-time directive, making the case suitable for clarifying the law in revision proceedings.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.