projetos

Revision allowed on compensatory overtime during standby duty abroad

BVerwG 2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)Bverwg / Divisão 220 de set. de 2016Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the plaintiff’s revision. It held that the case raises issues of fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO concerning compensation for overtime in the form of standby duty, in particular when the service was performed abroad. The court also noted that several parallel revision proceedings on the same subject were already pending before it.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance: Fundamental importance exists where the case is capable of clarifying unresolved questions of law that are relevant beyond the individual dispute. This may be the case where the legal assessment of compensatory overtime in the form of standby duty, especially in connection with service performed abroad, requires highest-court clarification. The existence of parallel pending revision proceedings may support the need for clarification and uniformity of case law (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-09-20

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:200916B2B112.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 24. August 2015, Az: 1 A 421/14, Urteilvorgehend VG Köln, 16. Januar 2014, Az: 15 K 6/13

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; durch Freizeit auszugleichende Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst insbesondere bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland

Gründe

1 Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung von Fragen geben, die sich im Zusammenhang mit durch Freizeit auszugleichender Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst stellen. Dies betrifft insbesondere die bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland erbrachte Mehrarbeit. Zu diesen Fragen sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht weitere Revisionen anhängig (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15, 2 C 28.15 und 2 C 3.16).

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental importancestandby dutyovertime compensationservice abroad

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Decisão extraída

Yes. The case raises legally significant questions about compensatory overtime in the form of standby duty, especially when the service is rendered abroad.

Fundamentação extraída

The court found that the matter could clarify unresolved questions of principle. It noted that similar revision proceedings were already pending, showing broader importance beyond the individual case.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.