projetos

Revision admitted on compensatory time off for standby overtime

BVerwG 2 B 68/14, 2 B 68/14 (2 C 28/15)Bverwg / Divisão 210 de dez. de 2015Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the plaintiff's revision. It found that the dispute over the temporal extent of compensatory time off for lawful overtime performed as standby duty raises a question of fundamental importance. The court noted that comparable revisions were already pending in other proceedings, which could allow clarification of the issue. It also provisionally set the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings in accordance with the appellate court's valuation.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of the revision for fundamental importance where clarification is needed as to the temporal extent of compensatory time off for lawful standby-duty overtime. A question is of fundamental importance if it is capable of clarification in the revision proceedings and is not yet settled in the court's case law; the pendency of parallel revisions may reinforce the need for clarification (consid. 1). Provisional determination of the amount in dispute follows § 63 Abs. 1 sentence 1 in conjunction with §§ 52(1) and (2) GKG and may align with the appellate court's valuation (consid. 2).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 2 B 68/14, 2 B 68/14 (2 C 28/15), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-12-10

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 68/14, 2 B 68/14 (2 C 28/15)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:101215B2B68.14.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 17. Juni 2014, Az: 4 S 169/12, Urteilvorgehend VG Stuttgart, 5. Dezember 2012, Az: 3 K 1353/13

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Zeitlicher Umfang von Freizeitausgleich bei rechtmäßiger Mehrarbeit im Bereitschaftsdienst; Revisionszulassung

Gründe

1 Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, in welchem zeitlichen Umfang rechtmäßige Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst durch Freizeit auszugleichen ist. Zu dieser Frage sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht zwischenzeitlich - nach Zulassung der Revision durch das Oberverwaltungsgericht Münster - von der Beklagten des vorliegenden Verfahrens eingelegte weitere Revisionen anhängig geworden (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15).

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental importancestandby dutyovertime compensationtime offamount in dispute

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the revision should be admitted for the question of how long lawful standby-duty overtime must be compensated by time off.

Decisão extraída

The revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.

Fundamentação extraída

The Federal Administrative Court held that the case can clarify the unresolved issue of the temporal scope of compensatory leave for lawful overtime in the form of standby duty; related revisions were already pending before the court.

Questão jurídica principal

Provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Decisão extraída

The amount in dispute was provisionally set in line with the appellate court's assessment.

Fundamentação extraída

The court based the provisional amount-in-dispute determination on the statutory provisions governing such assessment and followed the value fixed by the court below.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.