BVerwG 7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)•Leave to appeal: exclusion of objections under EU law
BVerwG 7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)Bverwg / Division 75 de jan. de 2015Granted
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court upheld the plaintiff’s complaint against the denial of leave to appeal. It found that the case has fundamental significance because the recurring question whether the objection preclusion rules in § 10(3) sentence 5 BImSchG and § 2(3) UmwRG comply with EU law still requires clarification. The decision also notes the rules on the amount in dispute for the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal on the ground of fundamental importance: A complaint is well-founded where the challenged judgment raises a question of law that is again in need of clarification and is capable of clarification in revision proceedings. This applies in particular where the compatibility of statutory objection-preclusion provisions with European Union law is disputed and has not been conclusively settled. The decisive factor is not the correctness of the lower court’s view, but the objective need for clarification in the interest of the uniform development of the law (consid. 1).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-01-05
Aktenzeichen: 7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:050115B7B4.14.0
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 10 Abs 3 S 5 BImSchG, § 2 Abs 3 UmwRG, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, 28. November 2013, Az: 2 L 157/12, Urteilvorgehend VG Halle (Saale), 28. August 2012, Az: 4 A 51/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 7. Senat
Revisionszulassung; Einwendungsausschluss
1 Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft die erneut klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, ob die Bestimmungen über den Ausschluss von Einwendungen in § 10 Abs. 3 Satz 5 BImSchG und § 2 Abs. 3 UmwRG mit dem Recht der Europäischen Union vereinbar sind.
2 Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether leave to appeal should be granted because the compatibility of § 10(3) sentence 5 BImSchG and § 2(3) UmwRG with EU law requires clarification.
Yes. The case has fundamental significance because the compatibility question is again in need of clarification.
The court held that the complaint raises a legally unresolved and recurring question of EU-law compatibility that is suitable for clarification in revision proceedings.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.