PAUSENSPASS: lack of distinctiveness for trademark

BPatG 25 W (pat) 579/12Tribunal Federal de Patentes / Division 2522 de nov. de 2012Dismissed

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Patent Court decided a trademark appeal concerning the word mark “PAUSENSPASS”. It held that the sign is not registrable because the relevant public will understand it as a descriptive or promotional expression rather than as an indication of origin. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 8 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 MarkenG; distinctiveness of word marks: a sign is excluded from protection if the relevant public will perceive it merely as a descriptive or promotional statement and not as a badge of origin. For the assessment, the overall impression of the sign in relation to the goods or services is decisive; a minimum of distinctiveness suffices, but purely laudatory or commonplace expressions do not meet this threshold.

Texto completo

BPatG — 25 W (pat) 579/12, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-11-22

Aktenzeichen: 25 W (pat) 579/12

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 8 Abs 2 Nr 1 MarkenG

Spruchkörper: 25. Senat

Titelzeile

Markenbeschwerdeverfahren – "PAUSENSPASS" – keine Unterscheidungskraft

Palavras-chave

trademark distinctivenessdescriptive signpromotional expressionword markregistration refusal

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the sign “PAUSENSPASS” is incapable of registration because it lacks distinctiveness under § 8(2) No. 1 MarkenG.

Decisão extraída

The sign was found to lack the distinctiveness required for trademark protection.

Fundamentação extraída

The designation is understood as a descriptive, promotional expression and is not perceived by the relevant public as an indication of commercial origin.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.