Further interim relief refused for G20 protest camp

BVerfG 1 BvR 1387/17Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. Kammer30 de jun. de 2017Dismissed

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected an application for a further interim order relating to a protest camp in connection with the Hamburg G20 summit. It held that interim constitutional relief was subsidiary to the emergency protection offered by the specialized courts, and that the weighing of assembly freedom against public interests was primarily the task of the competent local courts.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 15 VersammlG; subsidiarity of constitutional interim relief in protest and assembly disputes; the Federal Constitutional Court will not ordinarily replace specialized courts in balancing assembly freedom against public interests. Where effective fachgerichtlicher Eilrechtsschutz is available, a further constitutional interim order is generally refused; the decisive assessment of the local circumstances belongs first to the specialized courts on site.

Texto completo

BVerfG — 1 BvR 1387/17, Ablehnung einstweilige Anordnung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-06-30

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1387/17

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170630.1bvr138717

Dokumenttyp: Ablehnung einstweilige Anordnung

Normen: GG, § 15 VersammlG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Hamburgisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, 22. Juni 2017, Az: 4 Bs 125/17, Beschlussvorgehend BVerfG, 28. Juni 2017, Az: 1 BvR 1387/17, Einstweilige Anordnungnachgehend BVerfG, 26. Februar 2018, Az: 1 BvR 1387/17, Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer

Titelzeile

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer weiteren eA bzgl eines Protestcamps anlässlich des G20-Gipfels in Hamburg: Subsidiarität gegenüber fachgerichtlichem Eilrechtsschutz - Ausgleich zwischen Demonstrationsfreiheit und öffentlichen Interessen obliegt in erster Linie fachnahen Instanzen vor Ort

Tenor

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

Palavras-chave

interim reliefsubsidiarityassembly freedomprotest campG20 summitbalancing of interests

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether a further interim order should be issued concerning the protest camp at the Hamburg G20 summit

Decisão extraída

The application was refused because interim constitutional relief is subsidiary to specialized court emergency protection, and the balancing of assembly freedom against public interests is primarily for the competent local courts.

Fundamentação extraída

The Court found no basis to displace the prior allocation of responsibility to the specialized courts; the applicant had to rely on the fachgerichtlicher Eilrechtsschutz already available or granted.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.