projetos

Constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to respond under § 522(2) ZPO

BVerfG 1 BvR 1907/13Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. Kammer14 de abr. de 2015Inadmissible

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Constitutional Court did not admit the constitutional complaint. It held that the complainant had failed to observe the subsidiarity requirement because she did not file a response to the Regional Court’s indication under § 522(2) sentence 2 ZPO. Since an admissible complaint was lacking, the Court did not address her substantive constitutional criticisms of the lower-court reasoning. The decision was taken without further reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG and is final.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG; subsidiarity of the constitutional complaint where a party omits a response to an indication under § 522 Abs. 2 sentence 2 ZPO. A constitutional complaint is inadmissible if the complainant does not exhaust all reasonable possibilities of redress before the specialised courts. This applies in particular where, after an appellate court’s indication that the appeal is to be dismissed by order, the party refrains from submitting observations. In such a constellation, the Federal Constitutional Court will not examine the asserted constitutional objections to the challenged decisions (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerfG — 1 BvR 1907/13, Nichtannahmebeschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-04-14

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1907/13

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150414.1bvr190713

Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss

Normen: § 90 Abs 2 BVerfGG, § 522 Abs 2 S 2 ZPO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend LG Frankfurt, 4. April 2013, Az: 2-01 S 268/12, Beschlussvorgehend LG Frankfurt, 22. Februar 2013, Az: 2-01 S 268/12, Beschlussvorgehend AG Frankfurt, 6. November 2012, Az: 30 C 566/12 (20), Urteil

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde bei Unterlassen einer Stellungnahme gem § 522 Abs 2 S 2 ZPO

Gründe

1 Die Verfassungsbeschwerde genügt nicht dem Grundsatz der Subsidiarität. Die Beschwerdeführerin, die zu dem Hinweisbeschluss des Landgerichts gemäß § 522 Abs. 2 Satz 2 ZPO keine Stellung genommen hat, hat nicht alle zumutbaren Mittel ergriffen, um ihre Rechte vor den Fachgerichten geltend zu machen. Da die Verfassungsbeschwerde damit unzulässig ist, ist den von der Beschwerdeführerin geltend gemachten gewichtigen Bedenken gegen die verfassungsrechtliche Tragfähigkeit von verschiedenen Begründungselementen der fachgerichtlichen Entscheidungen nicht nachzugehen.

2 Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

3 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Palavras-chave

constitutional complaintsubsidiarityadmissibilityresponse obligationappeal indication

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite no response to the Regional Court’s indication under § 522(2) sentence 2 ZPO.

Decisão extraída

No. The complaint was inadmissible because the complainant had not exhausted all reasonable means to assert her rights before the ordinary courts.

Fundamentação extraída

By remaining silent in response to the indication decision, the complainant failed to satisfy the principle of subsidiarity; therefore the Court did not examine the substantive constitutional objections.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.