projetos

No “exceptional appeal” exists under § 574 Abs. 1 ZPO

BGH IX ZA 42 - 54/11, IX ZA 42/11Bgh / Civil Chamber 920 de set. de 2011Dismissed

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The debtor requested supplementation of the BGH order of 2011-07-05 after his legal aid request had been refused. The Senate held that it had already fully examined the prospects of success of the intended proceedings and that no further remedy, in particular no so-called 'exceptional appeal', existed. The application for supplementation was therefore rejected, and the debtor was told not to expect responses to further submissions in the matter.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 574 Abs. 1 ZPO; no supplementary review based on a non-existent 'exceptional appeal': where the court has already fully examined the prospects of success of the intended legal remedy in the legal-aid decision, a request for supplementation cannot be used to reopen or extend the catalogue of remedies. A so-called 'Ausnahmebeschwerde' is not a recognized procedural remedy and its admission is not constitutionally required (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BGH — IX ZA 42 - 54/11, IX ZA 42/11, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-09-20

Aktenzeichen: IX ZA 42 - 54/11, IX ZA 42/11

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 574 Abs 1 ZPO

Spruchkörper: 9. Zivilsenat

Titelzeile

Rechtsmittel der Ausnahmebeschwerde

Tenor

Der Antrag des Schuldners auf Ergänzung des Beschlusses vom 5. Juli 2011 wird abgelehnt.

Gründe

1 Der Senat hat die Erfolgsaussichten der vom Schuldner beabsichtigten Rechtsverfolgung bei Abfassung des Beschlusses vom 5. Juli 2011 in vollem Umfang überprüft und die beantragte Prozesskostenhilfe in demselben Umfang abgelehnt. Andere als die in den Beschlussgründen genannten Rechtsmittel kommen von vornherein nicht in Betracht. Das Rechtsmittel einer "Ausnahmebeschwerde" gibt es nicht (BGH, Beschluss vom 7. März 2002 - IX ZB 11/02, BGHZ 150, 133 ff); seine Anerkennung ist verfassungsrechtlich auch nicht geboten (vgl. BVerfGE 107, 395 ff).

2 Der Schuldner kann nicht damit rechnen, in dieser Sache Antwort auf weitere Eingaben zu erhalten.

Kayser Gehrlein Vill

Fischer Grupp

Palavras-chave

legal aidsupplementation requestextraordinary remedycivil procedureadmissible remedies

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the prior order had to be supplemented because an 'exceptional appeal' should have been considered.

Decisão extraída

The Senate had already fully reviewed the prospects of success of the intended legal action and there was no other remedy beyond those mentioned in the order; an 'exceptional appeal' does not exist and is not constitutionally required.

Fundamentação extraída

The requested supplement was unnecessary because the earlier order comprehensively addressed the available remedies. The asserted extraordinary remedy is not a recognized procedural remedy.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.