BAG 3 AZR 895/12•Pension dispute: claim dismissed on revision
BAG 3 AZR 895/12Bag / Divisão 313 de jan. de 2015Modified
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court ruled on the defendant's revision in an employment dispute. It set aside the judgment of the Düsseldorf Regional Labour Court, amended the judgment of the Düsseldorf Labour Court, and dismissed the claimant's action. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings. The document also notes that the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under Section 313a(1) ZPO.
§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons, the court may dispense with a full written reasoning. In revision proceedings, the Federal Labour Court may set aside the appellate judgment, amend the first-instance judgment, and dismiss the action if the challenged decision cannot be upheld on the merits. The dispositive part governs the allocation of costs according to the outcome of the proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-01-13
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 895/12
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:130115.U.3AZR895.12.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Düsseldorf, 14. Dezember 2011, Az: 3 Ca 2531/11, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 29. Juni 2012, Az: 6 Sa 287/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Auf die Revision der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 29. Juni 2012 - 6 Sa 287/12 - aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 14. Dezember 2011 - 3 Ca 2531/11 - abgeändert.
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .
| Zwanziger | Schlewing | Ahrendt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xaver Aschenbrenner | H. Frehse |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the revision by the defendant was successful against the appellate judgment
The revision was successful; the appellate judgment was set aside.
The court upheld the defendant's challenge and did not maintain the lower court's assessment.
Whether the claimant's action should succeed on the merits
The claim was dismissed.
After setting aside the lower judgments, the court rejected the claim in full.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.