BAG 10 AZR 237/11•Revision dismissed in labor dispute after waiver of reasons
BAG 10 AZR 237/11Bag / Division 1011 de jul. de 2012Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court, 10th Senate, decided a revision in an employment dispute. The defendant challenged the Lower Saxony Regional Labour Court judgment, but the revision was rejected. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the revision. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under Section 313a ZPO, so the judgment contains no substantive reasoning.
§ 313a ZPO; revision judgment without reasons where parties waive findings and reasons. If the parties validly dispense with findings of fact and reasons, the court may issue a shortened judgment. The revision court may then dispose of the appeal by operative part only; the substantive review of the challenged judgment remains decisive for the outcome, but the judgment need not contain a written statement of reasons. Costs follow the unsuccessful revision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-07-11
Aktenzeichen: 10 AZR 237/11
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Wilhelmshaven, 27. Juli 2010, Az: 1 Ca 145/10, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 7. Februar 2011, Az: 8 Sa 1360/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 10. Senat
Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 7. Februar 2011 - 8 Sa 1360/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben gemäß § 313a ZPO auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet.
| Mikosch | Mestwerdt | Schmitz-Scholemann | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rigo Züfle | A. Effenberger |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision against the regional labour court judgment should succeed.
The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.
The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision. The decision contains no further reasoning because the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under Section 313a ZPO.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.