BAG 8 AZR 643/10•Revision granted; appellate judgment set aside in employment case
BAG 8 AZR 643/10Bag / Division 810 de mai. de 2012Modified
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court decided a revision in an employment case. It set aside the Saxony State Labour Court's judgment of 24 September 2010 and, consequently, dismissed the claimant's appeal against the Labour Court Leipzig judgment of 17 December 2009. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision. The extract notes that the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under the procedural rules cited.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the revising court may dispose of the case by operative part only. If the revision is successful, the appellate judgment is set aside and the appeal against the first-instance judgment is dismissed; costs of the appeal and revision may be imposed on the losing party.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-10
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 643/10
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 17. Dezember 2009, Az: 1 Ca 2414/09, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 24. September 2010, Az: 3 Sa 80/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Auf die Revision des Beklagten wird das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 24. September 2010 - 3 Sa 80/10 - aufgehoben.
Die Berufung des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Leipzig vom 17. Dezember 2009 - 1 Ca 2414/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat auch die Kosten der Berufung und Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Böck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Avenarius | Wroblewski |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision should be upheld and the appellate judgment set aside.
Yes. The Federal Labour Court set aside the State Labour Court judgment.
The decision is dispositive only; the court states the parties waived findings of fact and reasons, so no further reasoning is given in the extract.
What is the outcome of the claimant's appeal against the first-instance judgment?
The claimant's appeal was dismissed.
As a consequence of allowing the revision, the appellate judgment was annulled and the appeal was rejected.
How are the costs of appeal and revision allocated?
The claimant must bear the costs of both the appeal and the revision.
The tenor expressly imposes the costs on the claimant.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.