projetos

Employment pay claim appeal partly inadmissible

BAG 6 AZR 127/10Bag / Divisão 619 de out. de 2010Partially Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The claimant pursued a salary claim under pay group V b BAT for the period from 1 May 2008 to 31 December 2009, specifically the highest age step. The Federal Labour Court partially upheld the defendant state's revision and set aside the Hessian LAG judgment in part. It held that the claimant's appeal was inadmissible to the extent it sought the relevant declaration. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in light of a lead parallel case, the appellate court may dispose of the matter summarily; in revision, the Federal Labour Court may partially set aside the appellate judgment and reject an appeal as inadmissible insofar as it extends to a declaratory claim not properly pursued. The costs follow the outcome of the proceedings (consid. implied by the tenor).

Texto completo

BAG — 6 AZR 127/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-10-19

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 127/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Gießen, 16. April 2009, Az: 1 Ca 73/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 6. Januar 2010, Az: 2 Sa 1295/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision des beklagten Landes wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 6. Januar 2010 - 2 Sa 1295/09 - teilweise aufgehoben.

  2. Die Berufung der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Gießen vom 16. April 2009 - 1 Ca 73/09 - wird im Umfang der Feststellung, dass das beklagte Land verpflichtet ist, der Klägerin Grundvergütung nach der Vergütungsgruppe V b der Anlage 1a zum BAT nach der höchsten Lebensaltersstufe dieser Vergütungsgruppe für die Zeit vom 1. Mai 2008 bis zum 31. Dezember 2009 zu zahlen, als unzulässig verworfen.

  3. Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 120/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

FischermeierBrühlerSpelge
BeusUwe Zabel

Palavras-chave

employment lawsalary classificationappeal admissibilitycostsdeclaratory claim

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the claimant's appeal against the first-instance judgment was admissible regarding the declaration on salary at the highest age step of pay group V b BAT for the period May 2008 to December 2009.

Decisão extraída

The appeal was inadmissible insofar as it sought a declaration that the defendant state had to pay base salary at the highest age step of pay group V b BAT for the stated period.

Fundamentação extraída

The Federal Labour Court partially set aside the appellate judgment and, in the relevant part, rejected the claimant's appeal as inadmissible.

Questão jurídica principal

Allocation of the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings.

Decisão extraída

The claimant must bear the costs of the appeal and revision.

Fundamentação extraída

Because the revision succeeded only to the extent of removing the inadmissible part of the appeal, the claimant was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.