projetos

Appeal inadmissible as to pay declaration in public employment case

BAG 6 AZR 121/10Bag / Divisão 619 de out. de 2010Modified

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The claimant sought a declaration that the defendant state owed basic salary under BAT IV b at the highest age step for the period from 1 August 2008 to 31 December 2009. The Federal Labour Court partially set aside the Hessian LAG judgment and held the claimant's appeal inadmissible insofar as it concerned that declaration. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision. The decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons because the parties waived them in view of the parallel lead case.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Waar; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel lead case, the appellate court may dispense with the statement of facts and reasons. If the appeal is inadmissible in the challenged scope, the Federal Labour Court dismisses it without examining the merits; the cost burden follows the outcome of the appeal and revision proceedings.

Texto completo

BAG — 6 AZR 121/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-10-19

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 121/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Marburg, 17. April 2009, Az: 2 Ca 106/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 6. Januar 2010, Az: 2 Sa 1124/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision des beklagten Landes wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 6. Januar 2010 - 2 Sa 1124/09 - teilweise aufgehoben.

  2. Die Berufung der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Marburg vom 17. April 2009 - 2 Ca 106/09 - wird im Umfang der Feststellung, dass das beklagte Land verpflichtet ist, der Klägerin Grundvergütung nach der Vergütungsgruppe IV b der Anlage 1a zum BAT nach der höchsten Lebensaltersstufe dieser Vergütungsgruppe für die Zeit vom 1. August 2008 bis zum 31. Dezember 2009 zu zahlen, als unzulässig verworfen.

  3. Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 118/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

FischermeierBrühlerSpelge
BeusUwe Zabel

Palavras-chave

admissibilityappealsalary entitlementcostswaiver of reasonsparallel case

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the claimant's appeal was admissible insofar as it challenged the declaration on salary entitlement at the highest age step for the specified period.

Decisão extraída

The appeal was inadmissible to that extent.

Fundamentação extraída

The Federal Labour Court partially set aside the appellate judgment and dismissed the claimant's appeal in the challenged scope as inadmissible; the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons in view of the parallel lead case.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.