BAG 8 AZR 978/07•Betriebs transfer objection forfeited; revision dismissed
BAG 8 AZR 978/07Bag / Division 822 de abr. de 2010Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Düsseldorf Regional Labour Court. The case concerned an employment dispute following an alleged transfer of undertaking and an objection issue. The court upheld the appellate judgment and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision. The decision notes that the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons, so the judgment was issued without a statement of facts or grounds.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 313a Abs. 1 S. 2 ZPO, § 555 Abs. 1 S. 1 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in the revision instance. Where the parties validly waive the judgment's factual findings and reasoning, the labour court may render a judgment without Tatbestand and Entscheidungsgründe. A revision that does not succeed is to be dismissed, with the costs of the revision borne by the unsuccessful appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-04-22
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 978/07
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Normen: § 72 Abs 5 ArbGG, § 313a Abs 1 S 2 ZPO, § 555 Abs 1 S 1 ZPO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Solingen, 13. Februar 2007, Az: 5 Ca 1426/06 lev, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 10. Oktober 2007, Az: 7 Sa 577/07, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Betriebsübergang - Widerspruch - Verwirkung - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 10. Oktober 2007 - 7 Sa 577/07 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).
| Hauck | Böck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Avenarius | Pauli |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Düsseldorf Regional Labour Court judgment was successful.
The revision was unfounded and had to be dismissed.
The Federal Labour Court found no basis to overturn the appellate judgment; the parties had also waived statement of facts and reasons.
Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings?
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.
As the unsuccessful revision appellant, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.