BAG 6 AZR 579/07•Employer loan; tariff limitation period; judgment without reasons
BAG 6 AZR 579/07Bag / Divisão 621 de jan. de 2010Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
In this labour-law revision case concerning an employer loan and a tariff limitation period, the Federal Labour Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment. The decision was issued without statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them in view of the parallel leading case 6 AZR 556/07. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel lead case, the Federal Labour Court may issue its judgment without such reasons. In the revision instance, the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs. The waiver is procedurally permissible where the case is governed by the same legal issue as a parallel leading proceeding; the court may then confine itself to the operative part and dispense with a full reasoning.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-01-21
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 579/07
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 23. Mai 2006, Az: 16/2 Ca 429/06, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. März 2007, Az: 17 Sa 1787/06, Urteilnachgehend BVerfG, 26. April 2010, Az: 1 BvR 910/10, Nichtannahmebeschluss
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Arbeitgeberdarlehen - Tarifliche Ausschlussfrist - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. März 2007 - 17 Sa 1787/06 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 556/07 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).
| Fischermeier | Brühler | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kapitza | Koch |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the claimant's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should be allowed
The revision was dismissed.
The court disposed of the case without factual findings and reasons because the parties waived them in light of the leading parallel case 6 AZR 556/07.
Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings
The claimant had to bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision failed, the claimant bore the costs.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.