BGH IV ZR 216/13•Revision dismissed under Section 552a ZPO
BGH IV ZR 216/13Bgh / Câmara Civil IV10 de mar. de 2014Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Court of Justice rejected the plaintiff's revision against the Cologne Regional Court judgment under Section 552a ZPO. It relied entirely on its prior indication order of 7 January 2014. Since the plaintiff did not submit any statement within the granted time limit, the Senate saw no reason to continue the proceedings. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.
§ 552a ZPO; summary rejection of a revision after prior indication and expiry of the response period. If the appellate court, after an indication order under § 552a sentence 2 in conjunction with § 522 paragraph 2 sentence 3 ZPO, remains convinced that the revision has no prospect of success, it may reject the revision by decision without further reasons by reference to the indication order. The absence of a party's submission within the allocated period supports the summary disposition; the costs follow § 97 paragraph 1 ZPO.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-03-10
Aktenzeichen: IV ZR 216/13
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Vorinstanz: vorgehend LG Köln, 29. Mai 2013, Az: 26 S 31/12vorgehend AG Köln, 13. August 2012, Az: 136 C 164/12
Spruchkörper: 4. Zivilsenat
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil der 26. Zivilkammer des Landgerichts Köln vom 29. Mai 2013 wird gemäß § 552a Satz 1 ZPO auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.
Streitwert: 3.420,23 €
1 Zur Begründung verweist der Senat in vollem Umfang auf die Ausführungen in seinem Hinweisbeschluss vom 7. Januar 2014, zu dem die Klägerin innerhalb der eingeräumten Frist keine Stellung genommen hat (§ 552a Satz 2 i.V.m. § 522 Abs. 2 Satz 3 ZPO).
2 Die Kostenentscheidung beruht auf § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Mayen Harsdorf-Gebhardt Dr. Karczewski
Lehmann Dr. Brockmöller
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision should be admitted and succeed against the Cologne Regional Court judgment.
The revision was not admitted and was summarily rejected under Section 552a sentence 1 ZPO.
The Senate refers in full to its prior indication order of 7 January 2014. The plaintiff did not comment within the granted period, so the court saw no reason to proceed further.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.