Court costs assessment and complaint relief

92a AR 146/16Tribunal de Primeira Instância30 de nov. de 2016Direito civilDeferido

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The District Court of Düsseldorf granted relief on a complaint filed on 20 November 2016 against its ruling of 16 November 2016. That earlier ruling had rejected a reminder dated 24 July 2016 against a court-cost assessment dated 15 June 2016. The court set aside both the earlier ruling and the cost assessment dated 16 June 2016. It also admitted the complaint under § 22(1), second sentence, JVKostG in conjunction with § 66(2), second sentence, GKG, because the matter was of fundamental importance.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 92a AR 146/16 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-11-30

Aktenzeichen: 92a AR 146/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2016:1130.92A.AR146.16.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Abt.92a

Tenor

Der gegen den Beschluss vom 16.11.2016 eingelegten Beschwerde vom 20.11.2016 wird abgeholfen. Der Beschluss vom 16.11.2016, mit welchem die Erinnerung vom 24.07.2016 gegen den Kostenansatz vom 15.06.2016 zurückgewiesen wurde, sowie die Kostenansatzrechnung vom 16.06.2016 werden aufgehoben.

Im Hinblick auf die grundsätzliche Bedeutung der Angelegenheit wird die Beschwerde nach § 22 Abs. 1 S. 2 JVKostG i.V.m. § 66 Abs. 2 Satz 2 GKG zugelassen.

Palavras-chave

court costscost assessmentremindercomplaintfundamental importance

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Whether to grant the complaint against the 16 November 2016 ruling and set aside that ruling and the related cost assessment.

The complaint was granted; the prior ruling and the cost assessment were set aside.

Whether to admit the complaint because the matter is of fundamental importance.

The complaint was admitted.

The court considered the matter to be of fundamental importance.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.