Revocation of insolvency-proceeding cost deferral

502 IN 151/12Tribunal de Primeira Instância25 de jan. de 2013Direito da insolvênciaDeferido

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Düsseldorf District Court revoked the deferral of costs for the opening and main insolvency proceedings. It held that revocation is warranted when claims established in the verification procedure fall within § 302 InsO and repayment would evidently be impossible even if the debtor obtained discharge. Revocation is also justified where the debtor at least grossly negligently omits to identify such claims, or their basis under § 302, in the insolvency application. Incomplete disclosure of the legal basis constitutes an incorrect statement within the meaning of § 4c InsO.

Sumário Omnilex

InsO Art. 4c and 302; revocation of deferred insolvency-proceeding costs. Deferral may be revoked where claims established in the insolvency verification procedure are claims excluded from discharge under § 302 InsO and it is evident that the debtor could not satisfy them even if residual debt discharge were granted. Revocation is likewise justified where the debtor at least grossly negligently fails to disclose in the insolvency application that clear claims are asserted on a § 302 basis. An incomplete indication of the legal basis of asserted claims constitutes an incorrect statement within the meaning of § 4c InsO.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 502 IN 151/12 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-01-25

Aktenzeichen: 502 IN 151/12

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2013:0125.502IN151.12.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Rechtspfleger

Normen: InsO §§ 4a, 4c, 302

Leitsätze

  1. Die Stundung der Kosten des laufenden Insolvenzverfahrens ist aufzuheben, wenn gegen den Schuldner im Prüfungsverfahren Forderungen i.S.d. § 302 Nr. 1 InsO zur Tabelle festgestellt werden und dem Schuldner auch bei einer gewährten Restschuldbefreiung die Tilgung dieser Verbindlichkeiten offensichtlich nicht möglich ist.

  2. Die Stundung der Kosten des laufenden Insolvenzverfahrens sit aufzuheben, wenn der Schuldner es zumindest grob fahrlässig unterlässt, eindeutige Forderungen nach § 302 Nr. 1 InsO nicht im Insolvenzantrag als auch unter dieser Anspruchsgrundlage geltend gemacht anzugeben.

  3. Auch die unvollständige Angabe von Anspruchsgrundlagen geltend gemachter Forderungen ist eine unrichtige Angabe i.S.d. § 4c InsO.

Tenor

wird die Stundung der Kosten für das Eröffnungs- und Hauptverfahren aufgehoben.

Palavras-chave

insolvency proceedingscost deferralresidual debt dischargeincorrect statementclaims excluded from discharge

The cost deferral was revoked.

Deferral may be revoked where claims excluded from discharge under § 302 InsO are established and repayment is evidently impossible even if discharge is granted, or where the debtor at least grossly negligently fails to identify such claims and their basis in the insolvency application. Incomplete disclosure of the legal basis is an incorrect statement.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.