27 C 8/12•Validity of allocating window-replacement follow-up costs to one condominium owner
27 C 8/12Tribunal de Primeira Instância27 de abr. de 2012Direito do arrendamentoParcialmente deferido
Extraído pela Omnilex
The plaintiff brought an action challenging a condominium owners' meeting resolution adopted on 12 December 2011 under TOP 5. The District Court of Bonn declared the resolution invalid insofar as it charged the plaintiff with follow-up costs directly connected to the window replacement, including costs associated with mould. The challenge was dismissed in all other respects. The plaintiff was ordered to bear 64% of the litigation costs, with the defendants bearing 36%. The judgment was declared provisionally enforceable.
WEG § 16 Abs. 4; allocation of costs arising from measures affecting common property. A resolution allocating costs to an individual condominium owner is invalid to the extent that it also places on that owner follow-up costs directly connected with the measure, such as costs resulting from mould after window replacement. The allocation may otherwise remain effective insofar as the challenge is unsuccessful.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-04-27
Aktenzeichen: 27 C 8/12
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2012:0427.27C8.12.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: 27. Zivilabteilung
Normen: WEG § 16 Abs. 4
Der Beschluss der Wohnungseigentümerversammlung vom 12.Dezember 2011 zu TOP 5 wird für ungültig erklärt, soweit der Klägerin die aus dem Austausch der Fenster resultierenden Folgekosten, die in unmittelbarem Zusammenhang mit dem Austausch der Fenster stehen (z. B. Schimmelbildung) auferlegt werden. Im Übrigen wird die Klage abgewiesen.
Von den Kosten des Rechtsstreits tragen die Klägerin 64 % und die Beklagten 36 %.
Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar. Jede Partei kann die Zwangsvollstreckung durch Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe des beizutreibenden Betrages abwenden, falls die jeweils andere Partei nicht vor der Vollstreckung Sicherheit in gleicher Höhe leistet.
Whether the resolution of 12 December 2011, TOP 5, validly allocated costs associated with replacing windows to the plaintiff, including directly related follow-up costs.
The resolution is invalid insofar as it imposes follow-up costs directly connected with the window replacement, such as costs arising from mould; the remainder of the challenge fails.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.