Appointment of a guardian to assert rights against an attorney-in-fact

2 XVII 453/18 BTribunal de Primeira Instância22 de mai. de 2019Direito da famíliaRejeitado

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

In guardianship proceedings concerning I. C., the Bielefeld District Court refused to establish a guardianship limited to asserting rights against the attorney-in-fact. The court ordered that no court costs be collected and that extrajudicial costs not be reimbursed. The decision provides no further factual background or reasoning.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Bielefeld — 2 XVII 453/18 B — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2019-05-22

Aktenzeichen: 2 XVII 453/18 B

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBI:2019:0522.2XVII453.18B.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Betreuungsgericht

Tenor

In dem betreuungsgerichtlichen Verfahren für Herrn I. C. wird die Einrichtung einer Betreuung mit dem Aufgabenkreis "Geltendmachung von Rechten gegenüber der Bevollmächtigten" abgelehnt.

Von einer Erhebung der Kosten wird abgesehen. Die außergerichtlichen Kosten werden nicht erstattet.

Palavras-chave

adult guardianshipattorney-in-factcosts

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Whether to establish a guardianship for the purpose of asserting rights against the attorney-in-fact.

The requested guardianship was not established.

Allocation of court and extrajudicial costs.

No court costs were collected, and extrajudicial costs were not reimbursed.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.