Video surveillance of a home's entrance

10 C 386/03Tribunal de Primeira Instância11 de nov. de 2003Direito civilDeferido

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The plaintiff obtained an order requiring the defendants to stop video-monitoring the entrance to the house, recording images of the plaintiff without consent, and pointing a camera-like object at the entrance. The defendants were also ordered to bear the costs jointly and severally. The judgment is provisionally enforceable upon provision of security of €2,750.

Sumário Omnilex

The use of a video-surveillance camera directed at a home's entrance, including the recording of a person without that person's consent, may be restrained by an injunction. Directing an object that resembles a surveillance camera at the same area is also covered by the order in this case. The decision does not identify a statutory basis or provide further reasoning.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Aachen — 10 C 386/03 — Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2003-11-11

Aktenzeichen: 10 C 386/03

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGAC1:2003:1111.10C386.03.00

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Spruchkörper: Abteilung 10

Tenor

Die Beklagten werden verurteilt, es zu unterlassen, den Haustürbereich des Hauses ....................., mittels einer Video-Überwachungskamera zu überwachen und mit der Kamera Bilder vom Kläger ohne dessen Zustimmung aufzunehmen sowie einen einer Video-Überwachungskamera ähnlich sehenden Gegenstand auf den vorgenannten Haustürbereich zu richten.

Die Beklagten haben die Kosten des Rechtsstreits als Gesamtschuldner zu tragen.

Das Urteil ist gegen Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe von 2.750,00 € vorläufig vollstreck-bar.

Palavras-chave

video surveillanceprivacyinjunctionconsent

The defendants were ordered to refrain from all three forms of conduct.

The defendants must bear the costs jointly and severally.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.