LC120002•Instalment payment of court advance and default warning
LC120002Tribunal Superior17 de jul. de 2012Granted
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Obergericht, II. Zivilkammer, granted the applicant permission to pay a CHF 3,000 court advance in four monthly instalments of CHF 750, starting on 16 August 2012. It further specified the default warning: if even one instalment is missed, the instalment arrangement falls away and a single short grace period under Art. 101 ZPO is to be granted.
Art. 98 ZPO, Art. 101 ZPO; instalment payment of a court advance and formulation of the default warning. The court may allow payment of an advance in instalments and may define the consequences of default in advance. If the judgment ties the instalment plan to a warning, the warning must make clear that a single missed instalment causes the instalment arrangement to lapse and triggers one short grace period; repeated extensions are excluded (consid. 3c by analogy).
Art. 98 ZPO, Art. 101 Abs. 3 ZPO. Ratenzahlung des Vorschusses und Nachfrist. Mögliche Formulierung der Säumnisandrohung.
Es wird verfügt: 1. Der Gesuchstellerin wird bewilligt, den ihr auferlegten Kostenvorschuss von Fr. 3'000.-- in Raten von je Fr. 750.-- zu zahlen, und zwar jeweils am 16. jeden Monats oder am folgenden Werktag, beginnend mit dem 16. August 2012. Bei Säumnis mit auch nur einer Rate fiele die Bewilligung von Ratenzahlungen dahin und würde eine einmalige kurze Nachfrist im Sinne von Art. 101 Abs. 2 ZPO angesetzt. 2. (...) Obergericht, II. Zivilkammer Verfügung vom 17. Juli 2012 Geschäfts-Nr.: LC120002-O/Z07
-> vgl. auch NP110002 vom 27. September 2011 E. 3c
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the applicant may pay the CHF 3,000 court advance in monthly instalments of CHF 750.
Yes. The applicant was permitted to pay the advance in four instalments of CHF 750 each, due on the 16th of each month, starting 16 August 2012.
The court exercised its power under the Code of Civil Procedure to allow instalment payment of the advance.
How the default warning must be formulated if one instalment is missed.
If even one instalment is missed, the instalment arrangement lapses and a single short grace period under Art. 101 para. 2 ZPO is to be set.
The court specified the consequence of default in a way consistent with Art. 101 ZPO and clarified that the warning should provide only one short additional period.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.