CTUT 262/2008•Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the roll
CTUT 262/2008Tribunal Cantonal / Câmara de Tutela16 de dez. de 2008Withdrawn
Extraído pela Omnilex
X.________ appealed an interlocutory judgment of the justice of the peace of the district of Nyon, but then withdrew the appeal by letter. The Chamber of Tutelles of the Cantonal Court took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll, and declared its order and the first-instance decision enforceable. It also held that the order could be issued without costs.
Withdrawal of appeal; striking out of the case; costs pursuant to Art. 236 al. 2 of the tariff of 4 December 1984 on judicial costs in civil matters: where the appellant expressly withdraws the appeal, the appellate court takes note of the withdrawal and removes the matter from the roll. In such a procedural termination, the court may render the decision without costs if the applicable tariff so allows (consid. ...).
TRIBUNAL CANTONAL 262 C H A M B R E D E S T U T E L L E S
Arrêt du
Vu le jugement incident du 13 octobre 2008, dont la motivation a été communiquée le 10 novembre suivant, par lequel le Juge de paix du district de Nyon a décliné sa compétence (I), éconduit X.________ de son instance (II), arrêté à 300 fr. les frais de justice du prénommé (III), dit que X.________ versera à F.________ la somme de 1'000 fr. à titre de dépens (IV) et rayé la cause du rôle (V), vu le recours interjeté les 16 et 21 octobre 2008 par X.________ contre cette décision, vu la lettre du 6 décembre 2008 par laquelle X.________ a déclaré retirer son recours, vu les pièces du dossier; attendu qu'il convient de prendre acte du retrait du recours de X.________ et de rayer la cause du rôle, que le présent arrêt peut être rendu sans frais (art. 236 al. 2 du tarif du 4 décembre 1984 des frais judiciaires en matière civile, RSV 270.11.5).
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the appeal should be taken notice of as withdrawn and the proceedings struck out.
The court took note of the withdrawal of the appeal and struck the case from the roll.
Because X.________ expressly withdrew the appeal by letter, there was no need to decide the merits.
Whether the cantonal decision could be rendered without costs.
The court held that the present order could be issued without costs.
Under the cited tariff provision, a no-cost decision was permissible in these circumstances.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.