CCUR oc05-041205-261/2013•Appeal became moot after withdrawal of guardianship mandate
CCUR oc05-041205-261/2013Tribunal Cantonal / Câmara de Curatela14 de out. de 2013Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
K.________ appealed a justice of the peace decision concerning her appointment as curator of H.________. Before the cantonal court ruled, the Justice of the Peace reconsidered its earlier decision, removed K.________ from the mandate, and appointed another curator. The cantonal judge held that the appeal had become moot, took note of that fact, and struck the case from the roll. The decision was rendered without judicial costs.
Art. 242 CPC in conjunction with Art. 450f CC; moot appeal after reconsideration of the challenged guardianship decision. Where the first-instance authority withdraws or replaces the impugned measure during the appeal proceedings, the appeal loses its object and is not decided on the merits; the appellate court merely takes note of mootness and removes the case from the docket (consid. 2). The competence to order the striking-off may lie with the single judge under cantonal procedural law. The decision may be rendered without judicial costs where the applicable tariff so permits (consid. 3).
252 TRIBUNAL CANTONAL IR05.041205-131675 261 L A J U G E D E L E G U E E D E L A C H A M B R E D E S C U R A T E L L E S
Arrêt du 14 octobre 2013
Présidence de MmeC R I T T I N D A Y E N , juge déléguée Greffière:MmeRossi
Art. 400, 450 et 450d al. 2 CC ; 242 CPC La Juge déléguée de la Chambre des curatelles du Tribunal cantonal prend séance pour statuer sur le recours interjeté par K., à Lausanne, contre la décision rendue le 25 avril 2013 par la Justice de paix du district de Lausanne dans la cause concernant H.. Délibérant à huis clos, la Juge déléguée voit :
3 - Par ces motifs, la Juge déléguée de la Chambre des curatelles du Tribunal cantonal, statuant à huis clos, p r o n o n c e : I. Le recours est sans objet. II. La cause est rayée du rôle. III. L’arrêt, rendu sans frais judiciaires, est exécutoire. La juge déléguée :La greffière : Du L'arrêt qui précède, dont la rédaction a été approuvée à huis clos, est notifié à : -Mme K., -Mme H., et communiqué à : -Justice de paix du district de Lausanne, par l'envoi de photocopies. Il prend date de ce jour. Le présent arrêt peut faire l'objet d'un recours en matière civile devant le Tribunal fédéral au sens des art. 72 ss LTF (loi du 17 juin 2005 sur le Tribunal fédéral – RS 173.110), cas échéant d'un recours constitutionnel subsidiaire au sens des art. 113 ss LTF. Ces recours doivent
4 - être déposés devant le Tribunal fédéral dans les trente jours qui suivent la présente notification (art. 100 al. 1 LTF). La greffière :
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the appeal against the earlier guardianship appointment remained pending after the first instance revoked that appointment.
The appeal had become moot because the challenged appointment was withdrawn by the first instance.
Since the Justice of the Peace reconsidered its earlier decision and removed K.________ from the curatorship mandate, there was no longer a live dispute to adjudicate.
Whether the appellate proceedings should be removed from the docket.
Yes. The court ordered the case stricken from the roll.
A moot appeal is not adjudicated on the merits; it is simply noted and removed from the docket under the applicable procedural rule.
Whether judicial costs should be charged for the appellate decision.
No judicial costs were imposed.
The court stated that the decision could be rendered without judicial fees.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.