Study allowance: proof of independent status under age 25

ATA/595/1996Tribunal de Justiça / Câmara Administrativa15 de out. de 1996

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The court held that, under Art. 19(1)(b) LEE, a person aged 25 or older seeking independent status for study allowances must produce two consecutive tax declarations each showing gross income of CHF 20,650. Future income projections are insufficient to meet this proof requirement. The decision concerns the evidentiary prerequisites for qualifying as independent in the study-allowance system.

Sumário Omnilex

Art. 19 al. 1 lit. b LEE; proof of independent status for study allowance purposes: a claimant aged 25 years or older must adduce two consecutive tax declarations evidencing a gross income of CHF 20,650 each. The requirement is strict and documentary in nature; prospective earnings forecasts or other forward-looking assessments cannot substitute for the statutorily prescribed proof. The provision thus excludes a relaxed evidentiary approach based on anticipated future income (consid. not specified).

Texto completo

Descripteurs

ALLOCATION D'ETUDE; ETUDIANT; MAJORITE(AGE); INTERRUPTION; FORMATION DANS UNE NOUVELLE PROFESSION; IP

Normes

LEE.19 al.1

Résumé

Aux termes de l'art. 19 al. 1 litt. b LEE, celui qui, âgé de 25 ans révolus, veut bénéficier du statut d'indépendant, est tenu de produire deux déclarations consécutives faisant état d'un revenu brut de Frs 20'650.chacune. Des projections dans le futur ne sauraient y pallier.

Palavras-chave

study allowanceindependent statusage requirementtax declarationsproof requirementsfuture income projections

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether a person aged 25 or older can establish independent status for study allowances by future income projections instead of two consecutive tax returns showing the required gross income.

Decisão extraída

No. Article 19(1)(b) LEE requires two consecutive tax declarations showing a gross income of CHF 20,650 each; projections into the future do not satisfy that requirement.

Fundamentação extraída

The statutory text sets a formal proof requirement. The court treated it as cumulative and retrospective, so anticipated earnings cannot substitute for the two required declarations.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.