SCARPA advances refused: no legal basis for enforcement

ATA/29/1996Tribunal de Justiça / Câmara Administrativa23 de jan. de 1996Confirmed

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The court confirmed SCARPA's refusal to resume maintenance advances. It held that compulsory enforcement against the debtor could not legally be pursued, so the conditions for resuming advances were not satisfied. SCARPA had timely initiated the procedure required under the New York Convention, and therefore could not be faulted.

Sumário Omnilex

LARPA art. 8a; resumption of maintenance advances presupposes the possibility of taking legally available enforcement measures against the debtor. Where enforcement abroad is impossible and the competent authority has timely initiated the procedure required by the New York Convention, the advance-paying authority bears no fault and the refusal to resume advances must be upheld.

Texto completo

Descripteurs

OBLIGATION D'ENTRETIEN; AVANCE(EN GENERAL); REPRISE; PROCEDURE; EXECUTION FORCEE; DOMICILE; DEBITEUR; ETAT ETRANGER; IP

Normes

LARPA.8 A

Résumé

Confirmation du refus du SCARPA de reprendre ses avances, vu l'impossibilité juridique d'entreprendre une procédure d'exécution forcée. Le SCARPA ayant engagé la procédure prescrite par la convention de New-Yord en temps utile; aucun reproche ne peut lui être adressé.

Palavras-chave

maintenance advancesenforcement abroadforeign domicilemaintenance obligationadministrative refusalNew York Convention

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether SCARPA had to resume maintenance advances despite the impossibility of forced enforcement against the debtor abroad.

Decisão extraída

No. The refusal to resume advances was upheld because legal enforcement proceedings could not be undertaken.

Fundamentação extraída

SCARPA had initiated the procedure required by the New York Convention in due time, so no fault could be attributed to it. Since legal enforcement was impossible, the statutory conditions for resuming advances were not met.

SCARPA advances refused: no legal basis for enforcementGerado por IA