Questão jurídica principal
Whether the federal appeal satisfied the formal admissibility requirements, in particular the duty to state conclusions and reasons.
Decisão extraída
The appeal did not meet the requirements of Art. 42 LTF because it failed to clearly set out the conclusions and did not explain why the Federal Administrative Court should have entered into the merits.
Fundamentação extraída
The appellant's submissions were unclear as to whether he challenged one or both inadmissibility judgments, and his arguments addressed his economic and medical situation rather than the reasons for non-admission of his earlier letters. A merits-based argument does not cure a complaint against an inadmissibility ruling.