projetos

Inadmissibility of social insurance appeal for insufficient reasoning

9C_255/2011Tribunal Federal / Divisão de Direito Público III20 de abr. de 2011Dismissed

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The appellant filed a social insurance appeal against a cantonal judgment concerning health insurance, but his submission merely recited facts and personal impressions. The Federal Court held that the appeal did not meet the requirements of Art. 42 LTF because it did not identify any legal error or demonstrate incorrect factual findings under Art. 97(1) LTF. It therefore dismissed the matter as inadmissible in simplified procedure under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF and waived judicial costs under Art. 66(1) LTF.

Sumário Omnilex

Art. 42 LTF; inadmissibility of an appeal for insufficient reasoning; Art. 108 al. 1 let. b LTF. An appeal must contain specific conclusions and a reasoned legal critique of the challenged decision. Mere factual narrative or subjective dissatisfaction does not satisfy the requirement to show why the decision violates federal law or rests on manifestly incorrect factual findings within the meaning of Art. 97 al. 1 LTF. If the deficiency is manifest, the Federal Court may declare the appeal inadmissible in simplified procedure. Judicial costs may be waived where the circumstances so justify under Art. 66 al. 1 LTF.

Texto completo

{T 0/2}
9C_255/2011

Arrêt du 20 avril 2011
IIe Cour de droit social

Composition
M. le Juge U. Meyer, Président.
Greffier: M. Cretton.

Participants à la procédure
M.________,
recourant,

contre

La Caisse Vaudoise, Martigny - Fondation Vaudoise d'assurance en cas de maladie et d'accident, Rue du Nord 5, 1920 Martigny,
intimée.

Objet
Assurance-maladie (condition de recevabilité),

recours contre le jugement de la Cour des assurances sociales du Tribunal cantonal vaudois du 23 février 2011.

Vu:
le recours formé le 26 mars 2011 (timbre postal) par M.________ contre le jugement rendu le 23 février 2011 par la Cour des assurances sociales du Tribunal cantonal vaudois,
considérant:
qu'aux termes de l'art. 42 LTF, le recours doit indiquer les conclusions, les motifs et les moyens de preuve (al. 1) et exposer succinctement en quoi l'acte attaqué est contraire au droit (al. 2),
que le recourant se borne à exposer les faits et à faire état de l'impression d'avoir été privé de la liberté de choisir son assurance maladie ou du doute que le non payement d'une facture justifie la reconduction d'un contrat résilié depuis longtemps,
qu'on ne peut pas déduire de ces considérations en quoi les constatations de la juridiction cantonale seraient inexactes (au sens de l'art. 97 al. 1 LTF) ni en quoi l'acte attaqué serait contraire au droit,
que, partant, le recours doit être déclaré irrecevable selon la procédure simplifiée de l'art. 108 al. 1 let. b LTF dès lors qu'il ne répond manifestement pas aux exigences de l'art. 42 al. 1 et 2 LTF,
que, vu les circonstances, il convient de renoncer à percevoir des frais judiciaires (art. 66 al. 1 seconde phrase LTF),

par ces motifs, le Président prononce:

1.
Le recours est irrecevable.

2.
Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3.
Le présent arrêt est communiqué aux parties, à la Cour des assurances sociales du Tribunal cantonal vaudois et à l'Office fédéral de la santé publique.

Lucerne, le 20 avril 2011
Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit social
du Tribunal fédéral suisse
Le Président: Le Greffier:

Meyer Cretton

Palavras-chave

inadmissibilityinsufficient reasoningsocial insurancehealth insurancesimplified procedurejudicial costs

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the appeal met the formal reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF

Decisão extraída

No. The filing did not state sufficient conclusions, reasons, or legal arguments and therefore failed to show why the cantonal judgment was unlawful.

Fundamentação extraída

Under Art. 42 LTF, an appeal must indicate the relief sought, reasons, and evidence, and briefly explain the alleged unlawfulness. The appellant merely described facts and subjective impressions without demonstrating factual inaccuracy under Art. 97(1) LTF or a violation of federal law.

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the simplified procedure could be used to decide the appeal

Decisão extraída

Yes. Because the appeal manifestly failed to satisfy Art. 42(1) and (2) LTF, it was inadmissible under the simplified procedure of Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.

Fundamentação extraída

The deficiency was clear on the face of the submission, making simplified summary dismissal appropriate.

Questão jurídica principal

Whether judicial costs should be charged

Decisão extraída

No costs were charged in view of the circumstances.

Fundamentação extraída

The court exercised discretion under Art. 66(1) LTF to waive judicial costs.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.