projetos

Criminal appeal inadmissible for lack of final cantonal decision

6B_643/2013Tribunal Federal / Divisão Penal11 de jul. de 2013Dismissed

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

X. appealed to the Federal Supreme Court against a Lausanne district court pronouncement that had declared his opposition to a criminal order inadmissible and confirmed the order's enforceability. The Federal Supreme Court held that the appeal was not directed against a cantonal last-instance decision, so the statutory admissibility requirement was missing. The appeal was therefore declared inadmissible. In view of the circumstances, no court fees were charged.

Sumário Omnilex

Art. 80 al. 1 LTF, art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF; admissibility of a criminal appeal to the Federal Supreme Court requires a decision rendered by the cantonal authority of last instance. Where the challenged decision is an intermediate or non-final cantonal pronouncement, the appeal is manifestly inadmissible and the matter is disposed of in summary procedure. Under art. 66 al. 1 LTF, the court may exceptionally waive judicial fees.

Texto completo

{T 0/2}

6B_643/2013

Arrêt du 11 juillet 2013

Cour de droit pénal

Composition
M. le Juge fédéral Schneider, Juge unique.
Greffière: Mme Gehring.

Participants à la procédure
X.________,
recourant,

contre

Ministère public central du canton de Vaud, avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD,
intimé.

Objet
Irrecevabilité formelle du recours en matière pénale,

recours contre le prononcé du 13 mai 2013 du Tribunal d'arrondissement de Lausanne (procédure PE13.002850).

Considérant en fait et en droit:

1.

Par prononcé du 13 mai 2013, le Tribunal d'arrondissement de Lausanne a déclaré irrecevable l'opposition formée par X.________ contre l'ordonnance pénale rendue le 19 mars 2013 dans la procédure PE13.002850 et constaté le caractère exécutoire de celle-ci. X.________ interjette un recours en matière pénale contre le prononcé précité du Tribunal d'arrondissement de Lausanne. En tant que le recours ne porte pas sur une décision prise par une autorité cantonale de dernière instance (cf. art. 80 al. 1 LTF), il est irrecevable, faute de décision attaquable, et doit être écarté en application de l'art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF.

2.

Exceptionnellement, le présent arrêt peut être rendu sans frais (art. 66 al. 1 LTF).

Par ces motifs, le Juge unique prononce:

1.

Le recours est irrecevable.

2.

Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires.

3.

Le présent arrêt est communiqué au recourant et au Ministère public du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 11 juillet 2013

Au nom de la Cour de droit pénal
du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique: Schneider

La Greffière: Gehring

Palavras-chave

inadmissibilitylast instancecriminal appealoppositionjudicial fees

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the criminal appeal was admissible despite not challenging a decision of the cantonal last instance.

Decisão extraída

The appeal is inadmissible because it is not directed against a decision of a cantonal authority of last instance.

Fundamentação extraída

Under Art. 80 para. 1 LTF, a criminal appeal to the Federal Supreme Court requires a decision from the cantonal last instance. That condition was missing, so the appeal had to be rejected under Art. 108 para. 1 let. a LTF.

Questão jurídica principal

Whether court costs should be charged.

Decisão extraída

No judicial fees are levied exceptionally.

Fundamentação extraída

The court decided to render the order without costs under Art. 66 para. 1 LTF.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.