6B_445/2012•Withdrawal of criminal appeal; case struck from docket
6B_445/2012Tribunal Federal / Divisão Penal4 de set. de 2012Withdrawn
Extraído pela Omnilex
The appellant withdrew his appeal against the Vaud cantonal criminal appeal judgment concerning insult and threats. The Federal Supreme Court took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the docket, and ordered that no judicial costs be levied. The decision was issued by a single judge and communicated to the parties and the cantonal court.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF; withdrawal of an appeal before the Federal Supreme Court; when the appellant withdraws the appeal, the Court takes note of the withdrawal and strikes the matter from the docket without ruling on the merits. In such a procedural termination, no judicial costs are levied absent contrary grounds; the decision is rendered by order (consid. 1).
{T 0/2}
6B_445/2012
Ordonnance du 4 septembre 2012
Cour de droit pénal
Composition
M. le Juge fédéral Schneider, Juge unique.
Greffière: Mme Gehring.
Participants à la procédure
X.________,
recourant,
contre
Ministère public central du canton de Vaud, avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD,
intimé.
Objet
Injure et menaces,
recours contre l'arrêt du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Chambre des recours pénale, du 23 mai 2012.
Considérant:
que, par lettre datée du 31 août 2012, X.________ a déclaré retirer le recours qu'il a interjeté au Tribunal fédéral contre l'arrêt de la Chambre des recours pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 23 mai 2012,
qu'il sied d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle (art. 32 al. 2 LTF), sans frais;
Par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne:
1.
La cause est rayée du rôle.
2.
Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires.
3.
La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Chambre des recours pénale.
Lausanne, le 4 septembre 2012
Au nom de la Cour de droit pénal
du Tribunal fédéral suisse
Le Juge unique: Schneider
La Greffière: Gehring
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the Federal Supreme Court should take note of the withdrawal and strike the appeal from the docket.
The Court noted the withdrawal and struck the case from the docket.
Once the appellant declared withdrawal by letter, there was no need to decide the merits; the case had to be removed from the docket under Art. 32(2) LTF.
Whether court costs should be charged after withdrawal.
No judicial costs were levied.
The order expressly states that no court costs are imposed in view of the withdrawal and removal from the docket.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.