Questão jurídica principal
Whether the federal complaint met the reasoning requirements and was admissible.
Decisão extraída
The complaint did not address the decisive question of standing and therefore failed to satisfy the reasoning requirements.
Fundamentação extraída
The lower court found the appellant was not burdened or aggrieved by the prosecutor's decision or its reasons. Because the appellant did not challenge this point before the Federal Court, the filing did not comply with Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG, so non-entry under Art. 108 BGG was required.