Questão jurídica principal
Whether the criminal appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the court-ordered advance of costs.
Decisão extraída
The appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to pay the required advance within the additional time limit.
Fundamentação extraída
Under Art. 62(1) and (3) LTF, failure to pay the advance after a first default and an expressly warned extension makes the appeal inadmissible; service of the extension order was deemed effective after the postal holding period.