Questão jurídica principal
Whether the appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the court cost advance within the non-extendable deadline.
Decisão extraída
No. Because the appellants neither paid the advance nor provided proof of timely payment by debit confirmation, the Court had to refuse entry.
Fundamentação extraída
The advance was requested with a final deadline and a warning of non-entry under Art. 62(3) BGG. The deadline was missed, including after account of court holidays; therefore Art. 108(1)(a) BGG required non-entry.