Questão jurídica principal
Whether the Federal Supreme Court judgment required clarification under Art. 129 BGG
Decisão extraída
The request was inadmissible in substance because the applicant merely sought the Court's view on his interpretation of the judgment, not clarification of an unclear, contradictory, incomplete, or mistaken dispositive.
Fundamentação extraída
Art. 129 para. 1 BGG allows clarification only for ambiguity, inconsistency, incompleteness, or drafting/calculation errors in the dispositive. The request did not allege such defects.