projetos

Unsigned state-law appeal held inadmissible

BGE 29 I 477Coletânea oficial do Tribunal Federal (BGE) / Volume I3 de ago. de 1903Inadmissible

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

Giequel challenged a judgment of the Uri district court by filing a state-law appeal to the Federal Court. The submission was not signed. The Federal Court held that a signature by the appellant or an authorized representative is an essential formal requirement of an appeal petition; without it, the filing is not a legally relevant act. The court therefore refused to enter into the appeal.

Sumário Omnilex

Art. 178 Ziff. 3 Org.-Ges.; Form requirements of a state-law appeal petition; signature as essential admissibility prerequisite. A recourse petition must be signed by the appellant or his authorized representative. An unsigned filing is not a legally relevant declaration and cannot trigger appellate review; the court must decline to enter into the appeal (consid. 1–2).

Texto completo

  1. Urteil vom 5. November 1903 in Sachen Giequel gegen Kreisgericht Uri. Form des staatsrechtl. Rekurses. Unterzeichnung. Art. 175 Ziff. 3 Org.-Ges. Das Bundesgericht hat in Erwägung:
  2. Daß die von Giequel eingesandte Eingabe, worin über ein Urteil des Kreisgerichts Uri vom 3. August 1903 Beschwerde geführt wird, nicht unterzeichnet ist;
  3. Daß zur gesetzlichen Form einer Rekursschrift im Sinne von Art. 178 Ziff. 3 Org. Ges. zweifellos auch gehört, daß sie vom Beschwerdeführer oder seinem Bevollmächtigten unterzeichnet sei, da ein Aktenstück ohne Unterschrift überhaupt keine rechtlich relevante Kundgebung ist. (S. auch Amtl. Samml., Bd. XXIII, S. 196); - erkannt: Auf den Rekurs wird nicht eingetreten.

Palavras-chave

admissibilitysignature requirementformal requirementsstate-law appealinadmissibility

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether an unsigned state-law appeal is admissible.

Decisão extraída

No. A valid appeal petition must be signed by the appellant or an authorized representative; an unsigned document has no legally relevant effect.

Fundamentação extraída

The Federal Court held that the formal requirements of a recourse under Art. 178 no. 3 Org.-Ges. include a signature. A filing without a signature is not a legally relevant declaration at all.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.