AGVE_2003_67•Standing to request and appeal refusal of cost guarantee
AGVE_2003_67Tribunal Administrativo / Câmara 131 de dez. de 2003Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Administrative Court of Aargau dealt with an appeal concerning a cost guarantee for material assistance. It held that the request for a cost guarantee may also be filed by the institution or person benefiting from it. However, the institution itself is not entitled to appeal against a refusal of the cost guarantee, because the substantive entitlement belongs in principle to the person seeking assistance and that person's circumstances are decisive. The decision thus rejected the institution's procedural standing on appeal.
Standing; cost guarantee for social assistance-related expenses: the request for a cost guarantee may also be lodged by the institution or person for whose benefit it is sought; however, appeal legitimacy against the refusal of such a guarantee is reserved to the materially entitled person. Since the substantive claim to assistance belongs in principle to the person in need and his or her personal circumstances are determinative, the assisting institution lacks its own legal interest to challenge the refusal (consid. 3–4).
288 Verwaltungsgericht 2003 führer der Ansicht ist, mit Ergänzungsleistung sei keine Verwandtenunterstützung nötig, berechtigt ihn dies nicht zur Auskunftsverweigerung. Beizupflichten ist auch der vom Gesundheitsdepartement vertretenen Ansicht, dass es, weil es sich um eine vom Zivilund Zivilprozessrecht geregelte Materie handelt, jedenfalls vorzuziehen ist, mit Korrespondenz und nicht mittels formellen Verfügungen vorzugehen. Im vorliegenden Fall wurden an das Nichthandeln bzw. die fehlende Kooperation der Verwandten keine Rechtsnachteile geknüpft oder auch nur angedroht, sodass der Beschwerdeführer durch Disp. Ziff. 5 nicht wirklich beschwert wurde. Unter dieser Voraussetzung erscheint der Fehler in der gewählten Form (indem verfügt wurde) allein zu wenig gewichtig, um eine Aufhebung der streitigen Ziffer zu rechtfertigen. 67 Beschwerde, aufschiebende Wirkung.
vgl. AGVE 2003 76 308 68 Kostengutsprache. Legitimation zur Stellung des Gesuchs und zur Beschwerdeführung.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the person or institution benefiting from a cost guarantee may file the request.
Yes. The request may also be submitted by the institution or person in whose favor the cost guarantee is sought.
The court agreed that the material assistance claim belongs in principle to the person in need, but this does not exclude a request being made by the beneficiary institution or person.
Whether the institution has standing to appeal the refusal of the cost guarantee.
No. The institution is not entitled to appeal the refusal of the cost guarantee.
The court held that the relevant legal position belongs to the person in need, whose circumstances are decisive; the institution therefore lacks the procedural legitimacy to challenge the refusal.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.