Income Tax Treaty PDF

CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN FOR THE AVOIDANCE
OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT
TO TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL
GENERAL EFFECTIVE DATE UNDER ARTICLE 28: 1 JANUARY 1996
TABLE OF ARTICLES
Article 1---------------------------------General Scope
Article 2---------------------------------Taxes Covered
Article 3---------------------------------General Definitions
Article 4---------------------------------Residence
Article 5---------------------------------Permanent Establishment
Article 6---------------------------------Business Profits
Article 7---------------------------------Associated Enterprises
Article 8---------------------------------Shipping and Air Transport
Article 9---------------------------------Income from Real Property
Article 10--------------------------------Dividends
Article 11--------------------------------Interest
Article 12--------------------------------Royalties
Article 13--------------------------------Gains
Article 14--------------------------------Independent Personal Services
Article 15--------------------------------Income from Employment
Article 16--------------------------------Directors' Fees
Article 17--------------------------------Government Service
Article 18--------------------------------Pensions. Etc.
Article 19--------------------------------Students. Trainees and Researchers
Article 20--------------------------------Other Income
Article 21--------------------------------Limitation on Benefits
Article 22--------------------------------Capital
Article 23--------------------------------Relief from Double Taxation
Article 24--------------------------------Non-discrimination
Article 25--------------------------------Mutual Agreement Procedure
Article 26--------------------------------Exchange of Information
Article 27--------------------------------Diplomatic Agents and Consular Officers
Article 28--------------------------------Entry into Force
Article 29--------------------------------Termination
Letter of Submittal---------------------of 9 September, 1994
Letter of Transmittal-------------------of 19 September, 1994
Protocol ---------------------------------of 24 October, 1993
Technical Changes---------------------of 1 August, 1994
Notes of Exchange 1-------------------of 7 September, 1994

Memorandum of Understanding-----of 15 September, 1994
Notes of Exchange 2-------------------of 15 August, 1994
Related Notes----------------------------of 10 July, 1995
Letter of Submittal (Notes)------------of 14 July, 1995
Letter of Transmittal (Notes)----------of 3 August, 1995
The “Saving Clause”--------------------Paragraph 3 of Article 1
MESSAGE
FROM
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
TRANSMITTING
CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN FOR THE AVOIDANCE
OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT
TO TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL, TOGETHER WITH THE PROTOCOL AND THE
TWO RELATED EXCHANGES OF NOTES, SIGNED AT ALMATY ON OCTOBER 24, 1993
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Washington, DC, September 9, 1994.
THE PRESIDENT,
The White House.
THE PRESIDENT: I have the honor to submit to you, with a view to its transmission to the Senate
for advice and consent to ratification, the Convention between the Government of the United States of
America and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and
the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, together with the
Protocol and two related exchanges of notes, signed at Almaty on October 24, 1993.
The Convention would replace, with respect to Kazakhstan, the existing income tax convention
between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, signed at Washington on June
20, 1973, and would modernize tax relations between the two countries. It is expected that the
Convention will be an important impetus to Kazakhstan's emergence as a market economy by
encouraging and facilitating greater U.S. private sector investment in Kazakhstan. The Convention will

establish a framework that we hope will contribute to the expansion of economic, scientific, technical
and cultural cooperation between the two countries.
Like other U.S. income tax conventions, this bilateral Convention provides rules specifying when
various categories of income derived by a resident of one country may be taxed by the other country.
The Convention also confirms that the residence country will avoid international double taxation by
granting a foreign tax credit, and it provides for administrative cooperation to avoid double taxation and
prevent fiscal evasion of taxes.
The Convention limits the tax that may be imposed by the country where the income arises (the
"source" country) on dividends, branch profits, interest, royalties, and capital gains derived by residents
of the other country. These limits are generally consistent with those in other recent U.S. tax treaties.
Business profits derived by a resident of one country may be taxed by the other country only to the
extent that the profits are attributable to a permanent establishment in that other country, and then only
on a net basis with deductions for business expenses. The Convention defines a permanent
establishment to include, inter alia, offices, factories and mines. A provision of the Protocol (point 8)
ensures the deductibility of wage and interest expense in calculating the Kazakhstan tax on profits. That
provision is important to the availability of a U.S. foreign tax credit.
The Convention provides conditions under which each country may tax income derived by
individual residents of the other country from independent personal services or as employees, as well as
pension income benefits. Social security benefits may be taxed only by the country which pays them.
Special relief is granted to visiting students, trainees, and researchers. The provision in the 1973
convention of a two-year exemption for visiting teachers and journalists is not retained.
The benefits of the Convention are limited to residents of the two countries meeting certain
standards designed to prevent residents of third countries from inappropriately using the Convention.
Similar standards are found in other recent U.S. income tax conventions.
The Convention assures that the residence country will avoid double taxation of income that arises in
the other country and has been taxed there in accordance with the Convention. In addition the
Convention includes standard administrative provisions that will permit the tax authorities of the two
countries to cooperate to resolve issues of potential double taxation and to exchange information
relevant to implementing the Convention and the domestic laws imposing the taxes covered by the
Convention. The non-discrimination provisions go beyond the standard provisions in including
assurances that citizens and residents of one country will not be subjected by the source country to tax
treatment more burdensome than that to which citizens and residents of that country or any third state
are subjected.
The Convention will enter into force on the date of the exchange of instruments of ratification. The
provisions concerning taxes on dividends, interest, and royalties will take effect on the first day of the
second month following the exchange of instruments of ratification, and provisions concerning other

taxes will take effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1 following the exchange of
instruments of ratification. Upon entry into force of the Convention, the 1973 tax treaty will cease to
have effect between the United States and Kazakhstan. However, a taxpayer may elect to apply the
1973 treaty in full for one additional taxable year if its provisions are more favorable.
A Protocol and two exchanges of notes accompany the Convention. The Protocol clarifies the
operation of certain provisions and denies treaty benefits with respect to dividends and interest paid by
certain U.S. investment vehicles. Most significantly, point 8 of the Protocol guarantees the deductibility
of wage costs and interest that might not otherwise be deductible under Kazakhstan law. One exchange
of notes confirms that Kazakhstan and the United States share the same understanding of certain
provisions of the Convention, including in particular, and understanding that the countries will exchange
information under Article 26 irrespective of internal laws on bank secrecy. The other exchange of notes
makes technical corrections to the Convention.
A technical memorandum explaining in detail the provisions of the Convention will be prepared by
the Department of the Treasury and will be submitted separately to the Senate Committee on Foreign
Relations.
The Department of the Treasury and the Department of State cooperated in the negotiation of the
Convention. It has the full approval of both Departments.
Respectfully submitted,
WARREN CHRISTOPHER
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
THE WHITE HOUSE, September 19, 1994.
To the Senate of the United States:
I transmit herewith for Senate advice and consent to ratification the Convention Between the
Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the
Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income
and Capital, together with the Protocol and the two related exchanges of notes, signed at Almaty on
October 24, 1993. Also transmitted for the information of the Senate is the report of the Department of
State with respect to the Convention.
The Convention replaces, with respect to Kazakhstan, the 1973 income tax convention between the
United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. It will modernize tax relations
between the two countries and will facilitate greater private sector U.S. investment in Kazakhstan.

I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to the Convention, Protocol,
and the two related exchanges of notes and give its advice and consent to ratification.
WILLIAM J. CLINTON.
CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL
EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL
The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of
Kazakhstan, confirming their desire to develop and strengthen the economic, scientific, technical and
cultural cooperation between both States, and desiring to conclude a convention for the avoidance of
double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, have
agreed as follows:
ARTICLE 1
General Scope
1. This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting
States and to other persons as specifically provided in the Convention.
2. The Convention shall not restrict in any manner any exclusion, exemption, deduction, credit, or
other allowance now or hereafter accorded:
a) by the laws of either Contracting State; or
b) by any other agreement between the Contracting States.
3. Notwithstanding any provision of the Convention except paragraph 4, a Contracting State may
tax, in accordance with its domestic law, residents (as determined under Article 4 (Residence)) and
Citizens or former citizens of that State.
4. The following benefits shall be conferred by a Contracting State notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraph 3:
a) under paragraph 2 of Article 7 (Associated Enterprises), paragraph 5 of Article 18
(Pensions, etc.) and Articles 23 (Relief from Double Taxation), 24 (Non-discrimination) and 25
(Mutual Agreement Procedure); and
b) under Articles 17 (Government Service), 19 (Students, Trainees and Researchers),
and 27 (Diplomatic Agents and Consular Officers) for individuals who are neither citizens of that
State nor, in the case of the United States of America, individuals having immigrant status
therein.

ARTICLE 2
Taxes Covered
1. The taxes to which this Convention shall apply are:
a) in the United States of America: the Federal income taxes imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code, but excluding the accumulated earnings tax, the personal holding company tax,
and social security taxes (hereafter referred to as United States tax).
b) in the Republic of Kazakhstan: taxes on profits and income provided by the laws on
Taxation of Enterprises, Associations and Organizations" and "On the Income Tax on Citizens
of the Kazakh SSR, Foreign Citizens and Stateless Persons" (hereafter referred to as
Kazakhstan tax).
2. The Convention shall apply also to any substantially similar taxes which are imposed after the
date of signature of the Convention in addition to, or in place of, the existing taxes, including taxes which
are substantially similar to those currently imposed by one Contracting State but not by the other
Contracting State and which are subsequently imposed by the other State. The
competent authorities of the Contracting States shall notify each other of any significant changes which
have been made in their respective taxation laws and of any official published material concerning the
application of the Convention, including explanations, regulations, rulings, or judicial decisions.
3. The Convention shall also apply to any tax on capital described in subparagraph (g) of paragraph
1 of Article 3 (General Definitions) that is imposed by either Contracting State as of the date of
signature of the Convention or thereafter, but only if such capital tax is provided by Federal or Republic
legislation.
ARTICLE 3
General Definitions
1. For the purposes of this Convention, unless the context otherwise requires:
a) the term "Contracting State" means the United States of America (the United States)
or the Republic of Kazakhstan (Kazakhstan), as the context requires.
b) the term "United States" means the United States of America, but does not include
Puerto Rico, the virgin Islands, Guam, or any other United States possession or territory. When
used in a geographical sense, the term "United States" includes the territorial sea, and also the
exclusive economic zone and continental shelf in which the United States, for certain purposes,
may exercise sovereign rights and jurisdiction in accordance with international law and in which
the laws relating to United States tax are applicable;
c) the term "Kazakhstan" means the Republic of Kazakhstan. when used in a
geographical sense, the term "Kazakhstan" includes the territorial sea, and also the exclusive
economic zone and continental shelf in which Kazakhstan, for certain purposes, may exercise

sovereign rights and jurisdiction in accordance with international law and in which the laws
relating to Kazakhstan tax are applicable;
d) the term "person" means an individual, an estate, a trust, a partnership, a company
and any other body of persons;
e) the term "company" means any entity which is treated as a body corporate for tax
purposes. In the case of Kazakhstan, this term means a joint stock company, a limited liability
company or any other legal entity or other organization which is liable to a tax on profits;
f) the term "international traffic" means any transport by a Ship or aircraft, except when
such transport is solely between places in the other Contracting State;
g) for purposes of Article 22 (Capital), the term "capital" means movable and real
property, and includes (but is not limited to) cash, stock or other evidences of ownership rights,
notes, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, and patents, trademarks, copyrights or other
like right or property;
h) the term "competent authority' means:
i) in the United States: the Secretary of the Treasury or his authorized
representative; and
ii) in Kazakhstan; the Minister of Finance or his authorized representative.
2. As regards the application of the Convention by a Contracting State, any term not defined therein
shall, unless the context otherwise requires or the competent authorities agree to a common meaning
pursuant to the provisions of Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure), have the meaning which it has
under the laws of that State concerning the taxes to which the Convention applies.
ARTICLE 4
Residence
1. For the purposes of this Convention, the term "resident of a Contracting State" means any person
who, under the laws of that State, is liable to tax therein by reason of his domicile, residence, citizenship,
place of management, place of incorporation, or any other criterion of a similar nature.
a) However, this term does not include any person who is liable to tax in that State in
respect only of income from sources in that State or capital situated therein.
b) In the case of income derived by a partnership, trust, or estate, residence is
determined in accordance with the residence of the person liable to tax with respect to such
income.
2. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 an individual is a resident of both Contracting
States, then his status shall be determined as follows:
a) he shall be deemed to be a resident of the State in which he has a permanent home
available to him; if he has a permanent home available to him in both States, he shall be deemed
to be a resident of the State with which his personal and economic relations are closer (center of
vital interests)

b) if the State in which he has his center of vital interests cannot be determined, or if he
does not have a permanent home available to him in either State, he shall be deemed to be a
resident of the State in which he has an habitual abode;
c) if he has an habitual abode in both States or in neither of them, he shall be deemed to
be a resident of the State of which he is a citizen;
d) if each State considers him as its citizen or if he is a citizen of neither of them, the
competent authorities of the Contracting States shall settle the question by mutual agreement.
3. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 a company is a resident of both Contracting
States, the competent authorities of the Contracting States shall endeavor to settle the question by
mutual agreement, but if the competent authorities are unable to reach such an agreement, the company
shall be treated as a resident of neither Contracting State for the purposes of deriving benefits under this
Convention.
4. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 a person other than an individual or a
company is a resident of both Contracting States, the competent authorities of the Contracting States
shall settle the question by mutual agreement and determine the mode of application of the Convention
to such person.
ARTICLE 5
Permanent Establishment
1. For the purposes of this Convention, the term "permanent establishment" means a fixed place of
business through which a resident of a Contracting State, whether or not a legal entity, carries on
business activities in the other Contracting State.
2. The term "permanent establishment" includes especially:
a) a place of management;
b) a branch;
c) an office;
d) a factory;
e) a workshop; and
f) a mine, an oil or gas well, a quarry, or any other place of extraction of natural
resources.
3. The term "permanent establishment" also includes:
a) a building site or construction, installation or assembly project, supervisory services
connected therewith, or an installation or drilling rig or ship used for the exploration or
exploitation of natural resources, but only if such site, project, or rig lasts or such services
continue for a period of more than 12 months; or
b) the furnishing of services, including consultancy services, by residents through
employees or other personnel engaged by the residents for such purpose, but only where

activities of that nature continue (for the same or a connected project) within the country for a
period of more than 12 months.
4. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Article, the term "permanent establishment" shall
be deemed not to include:
a) the use of facilities solely for the purpose of storage, display, or delivery of goods or
merchandise belonging to the resident;
b) the maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandise belonging to the resident solely
for the purpose of storage, display, or delivery;
c) the maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandise belonging to the resident solely
for the purpose of processing by another person;
d) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose of purchasing
goods or merchandise, or of collecting information, for the resident;
e) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose of carrying on, for
the resident, any other activity of a preparatory or auxiliary character;
f) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for any combination of the
activities mentioned in subparagraphs a) to e).
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2, where a resident of a Contracting State
carries on activities in the other Contracting State through an agent, that resident shall be deemed to
have a permanent establishment in that other State in respect of any activities which the agent
undertakes for that resident, if the agent meets each of the following conditions:
a) he has an authority to conclude contracts in that other State in the name of the
resident;
b) he habitually exercises that authority;
c) he is not an agent of an independent status to whom the provisions of paragraph 6
apply; and
d) his activities are not limited to those mentioned in paragraph 4.
6. A resident of a Contracting State shall not be deemed to have a permanent establishment in the
other Contracting State merely because it carries on business in that other State through a broker,
general commission agent, or any other agent of an independent status, provided that such persons are
acting in the ordinary course of their business.
7. The fact that a company which is a resident of a Contracting State controls or is controlled by a
company which is a resident of the other Contracting State, or which carries on business in that other
State (whether through a permanent establishment or otherwise), shall not of itself constitute either
company a permanent establishment of the other.
ARTICLE 6
Business Profits

1. The business profits of a resident of a Contracting State shall be taxable only in that State unless
the resident carries on or has carried on business in the other Contracting State through a permanent
establishment situated therein. If the resident carries on or has carried on business as aforesaid, the
business profits of the resident may be taxed in the other State but only so much of them is attributable
to:
a) that permanent establishment;
b) sales in that other State of goods or merchandise of the came kind as those sold
through that permanent establishment; or
c) other business activities carried on in that other State of the same kind as those
effected through that permanent establishment.
2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, where a resident of a Contracting State carries on or
has carried on business in the other Contracting State through a permanent establishment situated
therein, there shall in each Contracting State be attributed to that permanent establishment the business
profits which it sight be expected to make if it were a distinct and independent person engaged in the
same or similar activities under the same or similar conditions.
3. In determining the business profits of a permanent establishment, there shall be allowed as
deductions expenses which are incurred for the purposes of the permanent establishment. There shall be
allowed a reasonable allocation, between a resident of a Contracting State and a permanent
establishment of such resident situated in the other Contracting State, of properly documented expenses
incurred for the purpose of the resident's business activities. Such allocable expenses include executive
and general administrative expenses, research and development expenses, interest, and charges for
management, consultancy, or technical assistance, whether incurred in the State in which the permanent
establishment is situated or elsewhere. The permanent establishment shall not be allowed a deduction for
amounts paid to its head office or any of the other offices of the resident by way of royalties, fees or
other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission, for
specific services performed or for management, or by way of interest on moneys lent to the permanent
establishment. The business profits attributed to a permanent establishment shall be determined by the
same method year by year unless there is good and sufficient reason to the contrary.
4. No business profits shall be attributed to a permanent establishment by reason of the mere
purchase by that permanent establishment of goods or merchandise for the resident.
5. Where the information available to or readily obtainable by the competent authority of a
Contracting State is not adequate to determine the expenses of a permanent establishment, profits may
be calculated in accordance with the tax laws of that State. For purposes of this paragraph 5,
information will be considered to be readily obtainable if the taxpayer provides the information to the
requesting competent authority within 91 days of a written request by the competent authority for such
information.
6. For purposes of this Article, the term "business profits" means profits derived from the active
conduct of business. It includes, for example, profits from manufacturing, mercantile, transportation,

communication, or extractive activities, and from the furnishing of services of another person. It does not
include income received by an individual for his performance of personal services (either as an employee
or in an independent capacity) Income of an individual from the performance of services as an employee
is dealt with in Article 15 (Income from Employment). Income of an individual from the performance of
services in an independent capacity is dealt with in Article 14 (Independent Personal Services).
7. Where business profits include items of income which are dealt with separately in other Articles
of the Convention, then the provisions of those Articles shall not be affected by the provisions of this
Article.
ARTICLE 7
Associated Enterprises
1. Where:
a) a person which is a resident of a Contracting State participates directly or indirectly in
the management, control or capital of a person which is a resident of the other Contracting
State; or
b) the same persons participate directly or indirectly in the management, control or
capital of a resident of a Contracting State and any other person; and
c) in either case conditions are made or imposed between the two persons in their
commercial or financial relations which differ from those which would be made between
independent persons,
then any income, which would have accrued to one of the persons in the absence of those conditions,
but has not so accrued because of those conditions, may be included in the income of that person and
taxed accordingly.
2. Where a Contracting State includes in the profits of a resident of that State, and taxes
accordingly, profits on which a resident of the other Contracting State has been charged to tax in that
other State, and the profits so included are profits which would have accrued to the
resident of the first-mentioned State if the conditions made between the two persons had been those
which would have been made between independent enterprises, then that other State shall make an
appropriate adjustment to the amount of the tax charged therein on those profits. In determining such
adjustment, due regard shall be paid to the other provisions of this Convention and the competent
authorities of the Contracting States shall if necessary consult each other.
3. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not limit either Contracting State in applying its domestic law
to make adjustments to income, deductions, credits, or allowances between persons, whether or not
residents of a Contracting State, when necessary to prevent evasion of taxes or clearly to reflect the
income of any such persons.
ARTICLE 8

Shipping and Air Transport
1. Income of a resident of a Contracting State from the operation of ships or aircraft in international
traffic shall be taxable only in that State.
2. Income of a resident of a Contracting State from the following activities shall be taxable only in
that State:
a) income from the rental of ships or aircraft operated in international traffic by the
lessee;
b) income from the rental of ships and aircraft, whether or not operated in international
traffic, if such rental activity is incidental to the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic
by the lessor; and
c) income (including demurrage) from the use, or rental for use, of containers in
international traffic (including trailers, barges, and related equipment for the transport of
containers).
3. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall also apply to income from participation in a pool, a
joint business, or an international transportation agency.
ARTICLE 9
Income from Real Property
1. Income derived by a resident of a Contracting State from real property (including income from
agriculture or forestry) situated in the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State.
2. For purposes of this Convention, the term "real property" includes any interest owned or held in
tenancy by any individual or any legal entity in land, unsevered products of land as well as any fixture
built on that land (buildings, structures, etc.) and other property considered real property under the law
of the Contracting State in which the property in question is situated. Ships, boats and aircraft shall not
be regarded as real property.
3. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall apply to income derived from the direct use, letting, or use in
any other form of real property.
4. A resident of a Contracting State who is liable to tax in the other Contracting State on income
from real property situated in that other State may elect, subject to the procedures of the domestic law
of that other State, to compute the tax on such income on a net basis as if such income were attributable
to a permanent establishment in that other State. Any such election shall be binding for the taxable year
of the election and all subsequent taxable years unless revoked pursuant to the procedures under the
domestic law of the Contracting State in which the property is situated.

ARTICLE 10
Dividends
1. Dividends that are paid by a company which is a resident of a Contracting State and that are
beneficially owned by a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State.
2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the first Contracting State, and according to the
laws of that State, but the tax so charged shall not exceed:
a) 5 percent of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company
which owns at least 10 percent of the voting stock of the company paying the dividends; and
b) 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases.
This paragraph shall not affect the taxation of the company in respect of the profits out of which the
dividends are paid.
3. The term "dividends" as used in this Article means income from shares or other rights, not being
debt-claims, participating in profits, as well as income from other corporate rights which is subjected to
the same taxation treatment as income from shares by the laws of the State of which the company
making the distribution is a resident. The term "dividends" also includes income from arrangements,
including debt obligations, carrying the right to participate in profits, to the extent so characterized under
the law of the Contracting State in which the income arises. In the case of Kazakhstan, this term
includes, in particular, income transmitted abroad to the foreign participants of a joint venture created
under the laws of Kazakhstan.
4. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the dividends,
being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on or has carried on business in the other Contracting
State, of which the company paying the dividends is a resident, Through a permanent establishment
situated therein, or performs or has performed in that other State independent personal services from a
fixed base situated therein, and the dividends are attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed
base. In such case the provisions of Article 6 (Business profits) or Article 14 (Independent personal
Services), as the case may be, shall apply.
5. A company which is a resident of a Contracting State and which has a permanent establishment
in the other Contracting State or which is subject to tax on a net basis in that other State under
paragraph 4 of Article 9 (Income from Real Property), paragraphs 2 and 3(b) of Article 12 (Royalties),
or paragraphs l or 2 of Article 13 (Gains) may be subject in That other State to a tax in addition to the
tax on profits. Such tax, however, may not exceed 5 percent of the portion of the profits of the
company subject to tax in the other Contracting State which represents the "dividend equivalent amount"
of such profits.
ARTICLE 11
Interest

1. Interest arising in a Contracting State and derived by a resident of the other Contracting State
may be taxed in that other State.
2. However, such interest may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which it arises and
according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner of the interest is a resident of the other
Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed 10 percent of the gross amount thereof.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2:
a) interest beneficially owned or paid by a Contracting State, subdivision or local
authority thereof, and such government instrumentalities as may be agreed upon by the
competent authorities, shall be taxable only in that State;
b) interest arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting
State in respect of a loan for a period of not less than three years made, guaranteed, or insured
by any export credit agency wholly owned by that other Contracting State shall only be taxable
in that other State.
4. The provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the interest,
being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on or has carried on business in the other Contracting
State through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs or has performed in that other
State independent personal services from a fixed base situated Therein, and the interest is attributable to
such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case The provisions of Article 6 (Business profits)
or Article 14 (Independent Personal Services), as the case may be, shall apply.
5. Interest shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State when the payer is that State itself, a
political subdivision, a local authority or a resident of that State. Where, however, the person paying the
interest, whether a resident of a Contracting State or not, has in a Contracting State a permanent
establishment or a fixed base or derives profits that are taxable on a net basis in that State under
paragraph A of Article 9 (Income from Real Property), paragraphs 2 and 3(b) of Article 12 (Royalties),
or paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 13 (Gains), and such interest is borne by such permanent establishment
or trade or business subject to tax on a net basis, then such interest shall be deemed to arise in the State
in which the permanent establishment or trade or business is situated.
6. Where, by reason of a special relationship between the payer and the beneficial owner or
between both of them and some other person, the amount of the interest, having regard to the debt-
claim for which it is paid, exceeds the amount which would have been agreed upon by the payer and the
beneficial owner in the absence of such relationship, the provisions of this Article shall apply only to the
last-mentioned amount. In such case the excess part of the payments shall remain taxable according to
the laws of each Contracting State, due regard being had to the other provisions of the Convention.
7. A resident of a Contracting State may be subject in the other Contracting State to a tax, in
respect of interest, in addition to the tax on business profits allowable under the other provisions of this
Convention. Such additional tax, however, may not exceed 10 percent of the "excess interest amount."

ARTICLE 12
Royalties
1. Royalties arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting State may
be taxed in that other State.
2. However, such royalties may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise, and
according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner is a resident of the other Contracting
State, the tax so charged shall not exceed 10 percent of the gross amount of The royalties. In the case
of royalties described in subparagraph b) of paragraph 3, the beneficial owner 'lay elect to compute the
tax on such income on a net basis as if such income were attributable to a permanent establishment or
fixed base in the Contracting State in which the royalties arise.
3. The term “royalties” as used in This Convention means:
a) payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use,
any copyright of literary, artistic, or scientific work, including computer programs, video
cassettes, and cinematograph films and tapes for radio and television broadcasting, any patent,
trademark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or other like right or property, or
for information concerning industrial, commercial, or scientific experience; and
b) payments for the use of, or the right to use, industrial, commercial, or scientific
equipment.
4. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the royalties, being
a resident of a Contracting State, carries on or has carried on business in the other Contracting State
through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs or has performed in that other State
independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the royalties are attributable to
such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case the provisions of Article 6 (Business profits)
or Article 14 (Independent Personal Services), as the case may be, shall apply.
5. Royalties shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State when paid for the use of or the right to
use the right or property in that State.
6. Where, by reason of a special relationship between the payer and the beneficial owner or
between both of them and some other person, the amount of the royalties, having regard to the use,
right, or information for which they are paid, exceeds the amount which would have been agreed upon
by the payer and the beneficial owner in the absence of such relationship, the provisions of this Article
shall apply only to the last-mentioned amount. In such case the excess part of the payments shall remain
taxable according to the laws of each Contracting State, due regard being had to the other provisions of
the Convention.

ARTICLE 13
Gains
1. Gains derived by a resident of a Contracting State from the alienation of real property referred to
in Article 9 (Income from Real Property) and situated in the other Contracting State may be taxed in
that other State.
2. Gains from the alienation of
a) stock, participations or other rights in the capital of a company or other legal person
(whether or not a resident of a Contracting State) the property of which Consists principally of
real property situated in a Contracting State; or
b) an interest in a partnership, trust, or estate (whether or not a resident of a Contracting
State) to the extent attributable to real property situated in a Contracting State may be taxed in
that State. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term "real property" includes the shares of a
company referred to in subparagraph (a) or an interest in a partnership, trust, or estate referred
to in subparagraph (b), and in case of The United States includes a United States real property
interest, as defined in section 897 of The Internal Revenue Code (or any successor Statute).
.
3. In addition to gains from the alienation of shares described in paragraph 2 of this Article, gains
derived by a resident of a Contracting State from the alienation of stock, participations, or other rights in
the capital of a company or other legal person which is a resident of the other Contracting State may be
taxed in that other Contracting State if the recipient of the gain, at any time during the 12-month period
preceding such alienation, had a participation, directly or indirectly, of at least 25 percent of the vote or
value of that company or other legal person. Such gains shall be deemed to arise in that other State to
the extent necessary to avoid double taxation.
4. Gains from the alienation of personal property which are attributable to a permanent
establishment which an enterprise of a Contracting State has in the other Contracting State or which are
attributable to a fixed base available to a resident of a Contracting State in the other Contracting State
for the purpose of performing independent personal services, and gains from the alienation of such
permanent establishment (alone or with the whole enterprise) or such fixed base, may be taxed in that
other State.
5. Gains derived by a resident enterprise of a Contracting State from the alienation of ships, aircraft,
or containers operated in international traffic shall be taxable only in that State.
6. Gains from the alienation of any property other than property referred to in paragraphs 1 through
5 shall be taxable only in the Contracting State of which the alienator is a resident.
ARTICLE 14
Independent Personal Services

1. Income derived by an individual who is a resident of a Contracting State from the performance of
independent personal services shall be taxable only in that State, unless
a) such services are performed or were performed in the other Contracting State; and
either
b) The income is attributable to a fixed bass which the individual has or had regularly
available to him in that other State, or
c) such individual is present or was present in that other State for a period or periods
exceeding in the aggregate 183 days in any consecutive twelve-month period.
In such a case the income attributable to the services may be taxed in that other State in accordance
with principles similar to those of Article 6 (Business Profits) for determining the amount of business
profits and attributing business profits to a permanent establishment.
2. The term "independent personal services" includes, in particular, independent scientific, literary,
artistic, educational or teaching activities, as well as the independent services of physicians, lawyers,
engineers, architects, dentists, and accountants.
ARTICLE 15
Income from Employment
1. Subject to the provisions of Articles 16 (Directors' Fees); 17 (Government Service), and 18
(Pensions, Etc.), salaries, wages, and other similar remuneration derived by a resident of a Contracting
State in respect of an employment shall be taxable only in that State unless the employment is exercised
in the other Contracting State. If the employment is so exercised, such remuneration as is derived
therefrom may be taxed in that other State.
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, remuneration derived by a resident of a
Contracting State in respect of an employment exercised in the other Contracting State shall be taxable
only in the first-mentioned State if
a) the recipient is present in the other State for a period or periods not exceeding in the
aggregate 183 days in any twelve month period; and
b) the remuneration is paid by, or on behalf of, an employer who is not a resident of the
other State; and
c) the remuneration is not borne by a permanent establishment or a fixed base which the
employer has in the other State.
3. Remuneration derived by a resident of a Contracting State that would otherwise be taxable in the
other Contracting State under the preceding provisions of this Article may be taxed only in the first-
mentioned State when the remuneration is in respect of employment as a member of the regular
complement of a ship or aircraft operated in international traffic.

ARTICLE 16
Directors' Fees
Directors' fees and similar payments derived by a resident of a Contracting State in his capacity as a
member of the board of directors or similar body of a company which is a resident of the other
Contracting State may be taxed in that other State.
ARTICLE 17
Government Service
1. a) Remuneration, other than a pension, paid from the public funds of a Contracting
State, a subdivision or local authority thereof to an individual in respect of services rendered in
the discharge of functions of a governmental nature shall be taxable only in that State.
b) However, such remuneration shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if the
services are rendered in that State and the individual is a resident of that State who:
i) is a citizen of that State; or
ii) did not become a resident of that State solely for the purpose of rendering the
services.
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, the provisions of Article 14 (Independent
Personal Services) or Article 15 (Income from Employment), as the case may be, shall apply to
remuneration paid in respect of services rendered in connection with a business.
ARTICLE 18
Pensions, Etc.
1. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 2,
a) pensions and similar remuneration derived and beneficially owned by a resident of a
Contracting State in consideration of past employment may be taxed only in that State; and
b) social security benefits and other public pensions paid by a Contracting State may be
taxed only in that State.
2. a) Any pension paid to an individual in respect of services rendered to a Contracting
State, subdivision, or authority in the discharge of functions of a governmental nature and paid
by, or out of funds created by, that State, subdivision or local authority shall be taxable only in
that Contracting State.
b) However, such pension shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if the
individual is a resident of, and a citizen of, that other Contracting State.
3. Annuities derived and beneficially owned by an individual who is a resident of a Contracting State
shall be taxable only in that State. The term "annuities" as used in this paragraph means a stated sum

paid periodically as stated times during a specified number of years, under an obligation to make the
payments in return for adequate and full consideration (other than services rendered.)
4. Alimony paid to a resident of a Contracting State shall be taxable only in that State. The term
"alimony" as used in this paragraph means periodic payments made pursuant to a written separation
agreement or a decree of divorce, separate maintenance, or compulsory support, which payments are
taxable to the recipient under the laws of the State of which he is a resident.
5. Periodic payments for the support of a minor child made pursuant to a written separation
agreement or a decree of divorce, separate maintenance, or compulsory support, paid by a resident of a
Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State shall be taxable only in the first-mentioned
State.
ARTICLE 19
Students. Trainees and Researchers
1. An individual who is a resident of a Contracting State at the beginning of his visit to the other
Contracting State and who is temporarily present in that other State for the primary purpose of:
a) studying at a university or other accredited educational institution in that other State,
or
b) securing training required to qualify him to practice a profession or professional
specialty, or
c) studying or doing research as a recipient of a grant, allowance, or other similar
payments from a governmental, religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational
organization,
shall be exempt from tax by that other State with respect to payments from abroad for the purpose of
his maintenance, education, study, research, or training, and with respect to the grant, allowance, or
other similar payments.
2. The exemption in paragraph 1 shall apply only for such period of time as is ordinarily necessary
to complete the study, training or research, except that no exemption for training and/or research shall
extend for a period exceeding five years.
3. This Article shall not apply to income from research if such research is undertaken not in the
public interest but primarily for the private benefit of a specific person or persons.
ARTICLE 20
Other Income
Items of income of a resident of a Contracting State, arising in the other Contracting State and not
dealt with in the foregoing Articles of this Convention, may be taxed in that other State.

ARTICLE 21
Limitation on Benefits
1. A person that is a resident of a Contracting State and derives income from the other Contracting
State shall be entitled under this Convention to relief from taxation in that other State only if such person
is:
a) an individual;
b) engaged in the active conduct of business in the first-mentioned State (other than the
business of making or managing investments, unless these activities are banking or insurance
activities carried on by a bank or insurance company), and the income derived from that other
State is derived in connection with, or is incidental to, that business;
c) a company the shares of which are traded in the first-mentioned State on a substantial
and regular basis on an officially recognized securities exchange or a company which is wholly
owned, directly or indirectly, by another company that is a resident of the first-mentioned State
and the shares of which are so traded;
d) a not-for-profit organization that is generally exempt from income taxation in its
Contracting State of residence, provided that more than half of the beneficiaries, members or
participants, if any, in such organization are entitled, under this Article, to the benefits of this
Convention; or
e) a person that satisfies both of the following conditions:
i) more than 50 percent of the beneficial interest in such person, or in the case of
a company, more than 50 percent of the number of shares of each class of the
company's shares, is owned directly or indirectly by persons entitled to the benefits of
this Convention under subparagraphs a), c) or d), and
ii) not more than 50 percent of the gross income of such person is used, directly
or indirectly, to meet liabilities (including liabilities for interest or royalties) to
persons not entitled to the benefits of this Convention under subparagraphs a),
c) or d).
2. A person that is not entitled to the benefits of the Convention pursuant to the provisions of
paragraph 1 may, nevertheless, be granted the benefits of the Convention if the competent authority of
the State in which the income arises so determines.
3. For purposes of subparagraph (e) (ii) of paragraph 1, the term "gross income" means gross
receipts, or where a person is engaged in a business which includes the manufacture or production of
goods, gross receipts reduced by the direct costs of labor and materials attributable to such manufacture
or production and paid or payable out of such receipts.
ARTICLE 22
Capital

1. Capital represented by real property referred to in Article 9 (Income from Real Property) owned
by a resident of a Contracting State and situated in the other Contracting State, may be taxed in that
other State.
2. Capital represented by movable property forming part of the business property of a permanent
establishment which a resident of a Contracting State has in the other Contracting State, or by movable
property pertaining to a fixed base available to a resident of a Contracting State in the other Contracting
State for the purpose of performing independent personal services, may be taxed in that other State.
3. Capital represented by ships, aircraft, and containers owned by a resident of a Contracting State
and operated in international traffic, and by movable property pertaining to the operation of such ships,
aircraft, and containers shall be taxable only in that State.
4. All other elements of capital of a resident of a Contracting State (as determined under
Article 4 (Residence)) shall be taxable only in that State.
ARTICLE 23
Relief from Double Taxation
In accordance with the provisions and subject to the limitations of the law of each Contracting State
(as it may be amended from time to time without changing the general principle hereof), each State shall
allow to its residents (and, in the case of the United States, its citizens), as a credit against the income
tax of that State:
a) the income tax paid to the other Contracting State by or on behalf of such residents
or citizens; and
b) in the case of a company owning at least 10 percent of the voting stock of a
company which is a resident of the other Contracting State and from which the first-mentioned
company receives dividends, the income tax paid to the other State by or on behalf of the
distributing company with respect to the profits out of which the dividends are paid.
For purposes of this Article, the United States taxes referred to in paragraphs 1 a) and 2 of Article 2
(Taxes Covered), and the Kazakhstan taxes referred to in paragraphs 1 b) and 2 of Article 2 (Taxes
Covered), as described in paragraph 8 of the Protocol to this Convention, shall be considered income
taxes.
ARTICLE 24
Non-discrimination
1. A citizen of a Contracting State shall not be subjected in the other Contracting State to any
taxation or any requirement connected therewith which is other or more burdensome than the taxation
and connected requirements to which a citizen of that other State or of a third State, who is in the same

circumstances, is or may be subjected. This provision shall apply to persons who are not residents of
one or both of the Contracting States. This provision shall not be construed as obliging a Contracting
State to grant to citizens of the other Contracting State tax benefits granted by special agreements to
citizens of a third State.
2. A resident of a Contracting State which has a permanent establishment in the other Contracting
State shall not, in that other State and with respect to income attributable to that permanent
establishment, be subjected to more burdensome taxes than are generally imposed on residents of that
other State or of a third State which are carrying on the same activities. This provision shall not be
construed as obliging a Contracting State to grant to permanent establishments of the residents of the
other Contracting State tax benefits granted by special agreements to permanent establishments of the
residents of a third State.
3. Except where the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 7 (Associated Enterprises), paragraph 4 of
Article 11 (Interest), or paragraph 6 of Article 12 (Royalties) apply, interest, royalties, and other
disbursements paid by a resident of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State
shall, for the purposes of determining' the taxable profits of the first-mentioned resident, be deductible
under the same conditions as if they had been paid to a resident of the first-mentioned State. Similarly,
any debts of a resident of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State shall, for the
purposes of determining the taxable Capital of the first-mentioned resident, be deductible under the
same conditions as if they had been contracted to a resident of the first-mentioned State.
4. A company which is a resident of a Contracting State, the capital of which is wholly or partly
owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by one or more residents of the other Contracting State, shall
not be subjected in the first-mentioned State to any taxation or any requirement connected therewith
which is more burdensome than the taxation and connected requirements to which other similar
companies which are residents of the first-mentioned State (whether owned by residents of that State or
of a third State) are or may be subjected.
5. Nothing in this Article shall prevent a Contracting State from imposing the tax described in
paragraph 5 of Article 10 (Dividends) or paragraph 7 of Article 11 (Interest).
6. The provisions of this Article shall, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 2 (Taxes Covered),
apply to taxes of every kind and description.
ARTICLE 25
Mutual Agreement Procedure
1. Where a person considers that the actions of one or both of the Contracting States result or will
result for him in taxation not in accordance with the provisions of this Convention, he may, irrespective
of the remedies provided by the domestic law of those States, present his case to the competent
authority of the Contracting State of which he is a resident or citizen.

2. The competent authority shall endeavor, if the objection appears to it to be justified and if it is not
itself able to arrive at a satisfactory solution, to resolve the case by mutual agreement with the competent
authority of the other Contracting State, with a view to the avoidance of taxation which is not in
accordance with the Convention. Any agreement reached shall be implemented notwithstanding any
time limits or other procedural limitations in the domestic law of the Contracting States.
3. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall endeavor to resolve by mutual
agreement any difficulties or doubts arising as to the interpretation or application of the Convention. In
particular the competent authorities of the Contracting States may agree:
a) to the same attribution of income, deductions, credits, or allowances of a resident of
a Contracting State to its permanent establishment situated in the other Contracting State;
b) to the same allocation of income, deductions, credits, or allowances between
persons;
c) to the same characterization of particular items of income;
d) to the same application of source rules with respect to particular items of income;
e) to a common meaning of a term; and
f) to the application of the provisions of domestic law regarding penalties, fines, and
interest in a manner consistent with the purposes of the Convention.
They may also consult together for the elimination of double taxation in cases not provided for in the
Convention.
4. The Competent authorities of the Contracting States may communicate with each other directly
for the purpose of reaching an agreement in the sense of the preceding paragraphs.
5. If any difficulty or doubt arising as to the interpretation or application of this Convention cannot
be resolved by the competent authorities pursuant to the previous paragraphs of this Article, the case
may, if both competent authorities and the taxpayer(s) agree, be submitted for arbitration, provided that
the taxpayer agrees in writing to be bound by the decision of the arbitration board. The decision of the
arbitration board in a particular case shall be binding on both States with respect to that case. The
procedures shall be established between the States by notes to be exchanged through diplomatic
channels. After a period of three years after the entry into force of this Convention, the competent
authorities shall consult in order to determine whether it is appropriate to make the exchange of
diplomatic notes. The provisions of this paragraph shall have effect after the States have so agreed
through the exchange of diplomatic notes.
ARTICLE 26
Exchange of Information
1. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall exchange such information as is
necessary for carrying out the provisions of this Convention or of the domestic laws of the Contracting
States concerning taxes covered by the Convention insofar as the taxation thereunder is not contrary to

the Convention. The exchange of information is not restricted by Article 1 (General Scope). Any
information received by a Contracting State shall be treated as confidential in the same manner as
information obtained under the domestic laws of that State and shall be disclosed only to persons or
authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) involved in the assessment, collection, or
administration of, the enforcement or prosecution in respect of, or the determination of appeals in
relation to, the taxes covered by the Convention. Such persons or authorities shall use the information
only for such purposes. They may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial
decisions.
2. In no case shall the provisions of paragraph 1 be construed so as to impose on a Contracting
State the obligation
a) to carry out administrative measures at variance with the laws and administrative
practice of that or of the other Contracting State;
b) to supply information which is not obtainable under the laws or in the normal course
of the administration of that or of the other Contracting State;
c) to supply information which would disclose any trade, business, industrial,
commercial, or professional secret or trade process, or information the disclosure of which
would be contrary to public policy.
3. If information is requested by a Contracting State in accordance with this Article, the other
Contracting State shall obtain the information to which the request relates in the same manner and to the
same extent as if the tax of the first-mentioned State were the tax of that other State and were being
imposed by that other State. If specifically requested by the competent authority of the Contracting
State, the competent authority of the other Contracting State shall provide information under this Article
in the form of depositions of witnesses and authenticated copies of complete original documents
(including books, papers, statements, records, accounts, and writings), to the same extent such
depositions and documents can be obtained under the laws and administrative practices of that other
State with respect to its own taxes.
4. For the purposes of this Article, the Convention shall apply, notwithstanding the provisions of
Article 2 (Taxes Covered), to taxes of every kind imposed by a Contracting State.
ARTICLE 27
Diplomatic Agents and Consular Officers
Nothing in this Convention shall affect the fiscal privileges of members of diplomatic missions and
consular officers or employees of a consular establishment under the general rules of international law or
under the provisions of special agreements.
ARTICLE 28
Entry into Force

1. This Convention shall be subject to ratification in each Contracting State and instruments of
ratification shall be exchanged at _____________________ as soon as possible.
2. The Convention shall enter into force on the date of the exchange of instruments of ratification
and its provisions shall have effect:
a) in respect of taxes withheld at source on dividends, interest or royalties, for amounts
paid or credited on or after the first day of the second month following the month in which the
Convention enters into force;
b) in respect of other taxes, for taxable periods beginning on or after the first day of
January of the year in which the Convention enters into force.
ARTICLE 29
Termination
1. This Convention shall remain in force until terminated by a Contracting State Either Contracting
State may terminate the Convention at any time after 5 years from the date on which the Convention
enters into force, by giving, through diplomatic channels, at least 6 months prior notice of termination in
writing. In such event, the Convention shall cease to have effect:
a) in respect of taxes withheld at source, for amounts paid or credited on or after the
first of January following the expiration of the 6-month period;
b) in respect of other taxes, for taxable periods beginning on or after the first of January
following the expiration of the 6 month period.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly authorized by their respective
Governments, have signed this Convention.
DONE at Almaty this 24th day of October 1993, in duplicate, in the English and Russian languages,
both texts being equally authentic. A Kazakh language text shall be prepared, which shall be considered
equally authentic upon an exchange of diplomatic notes confirming its conformity with the English
language text.
FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN:
(s)Warren Christopher(s)
PROTOCOL

At the signing today of the Convention between the Government of the United States of America
and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the
Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, the undersigned have
agreed upon the following provisions, which shall form an integral part of the Convention:
1. With regard to Article 5,
It is understood that a fixed place of business through which a resident of a Contracting State carries
on business in the other Contracting State constitutes a permanent establishment, whether or not such
place of business is owned by the resident. For example, the operation of a mine, an oil or gas well, a
quarry or any other place of extraction of natural resources constitutes a permanent establishment of the
operator, without regard to whether the operator owns the property from which the natural resources
are extracted.
2. With regard to Article 10,
(a) In the case of dividends from a United States Regulated Investment Company,
subparagraph (b), and not subparagraph (a) of paragraph 2 shall apply. In the case of dividends
from a United States Real Estate Investment Trust, the rate of withholding applicable under
domestic law shall apply.
(b) The term "dividend equivalent amount," as used in paragraph 5, refers to the portion
of the profits of a permanent establishment subject to a tax under Article 6 (Business Profits), or
that portion of the profits of a resident of one State subject to tax on a net basis in the other
State under paragraph 4 of Article 9 (Income from Real Property), paragraphs 2 and 3(b) of
Article 12 (Royalties), or paragraphs 1 or 2 of Article 13 (Gains), that is comparable to the
amount that would be distributed as a dividend if such income were earned by a locally
incorporated subsidiary. In the case of the United States, the term "dividend equivalent amount"
shall have the same meaning that it has under the law of the United States as it may be amended
from time to time without changing the general principle of this paragraph 2(b) of the Protocol.
3. With regard to Article 11,
a) If Kazakhstan agrees in a treaty with another country which is a member of the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to impose a lower rate on interest
than the rate specified in paragraph 2, both Contracting States shall apply that lower rate instead
of the rate specified in paragraph 2.
b) For purposes of paragraph 3 (b), the agencies and instrumentalities referred to shall
be the Export-Import Bank and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation of the United
States and similar agencies of either Contracting State as may be agreed upon in future by the
competent authorities. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply provided that the lender does
not have a right of recourse for payment of principal or interest to any person other than the
borrower or a governmental body in the country of the borrower.
c) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, the United States may tax an excess
inclusion with respect to a Real Estate Mortgage Interest Conduit (“REMIC”) in accordance
with its domestic law.

d) Where a resident of Kazakhstan conducts business in the United States through a
permanent establishment in the United States or derives income subject to tax in the United
States on a net basis by reason of paragraph 4 of Article 9 (Income from Real Property),
paragraphs 2 and 3(b) of Article 12 (Royalties), paragraphs 1 or 2 of Article 13 (Gains), or
Article 14 (Independent Personal Services), the "excess interest amount" shall be the excess if
any, of
(i) interest borne by the permanent establishment or trade or business subject to
tax on a net basis in the United States, over
(ii) the interest paid by such permanent establishment or trade or business
subject to tax on a net basis. Where a resident of the United States conducts business in
Kazakhstan through a permanent establishment in Kazakhstan or derives income
subject to tax in Kazakhstan on a net basis by reason of paragraph 4 of Article 9
(Income from Real Property), paragraphs 2 and 3(b) of Article 12 (Royalties),
paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 13 (Gains), or Article 14 (Independent Personal Services),
the "excess interest amount" shall be the amount of interest expense that is deductible in
computing the resident's profits attributable to the permanent establishment in
Kazakhstan or to the trade or business subject to tax in Kazakhstan on a net basis and
that is comparable to the meaning of 'excess interest amount" in the preceding sentence.
4. With regard to Articles 10, 11 and 12,
Taxes may be withheld at the source in a Contracting State at the rates provided by domestic law,
but any excess amount will be refunded in a timely manner on application by the taxpayer if the right to
collect the said taxes is waived or limited by the provisions of the Convention.
5. Regarding Articles 9 and 12,
Where a resident of a Contracting State elects to Compute the tax due under Article 9 or 12 on a
net basis, as provided for in those articles, the competent authorities of each Contracting State may
adopt reasonable rules for the determination and reporting of taxable income. Each competent authority
may also adopt procedures to ensure that a person deriving such income provides books and records
as necessary to determine the proper amount of the tax.
6. With regard to paragraph 3 of Article 13,
If either Contracting State introduces such a tax, it shall inform the other Contracting State in a
timely manner, and agrees to consult with that other State as to whether it is appropriate to amend the
treaty to provide non-recognition treatment in certain cases.
7. With regard to Article 21,
In the United States, the term “officially recognized securities exchange” means the NASDAQ
System owned by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., and any stock exchange
registered with the Securities Exchange Commission as a national securities exchange for purposes the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
8. With regard to Article 23,

a) It is understood that in the case of an individual resident in Kazakhstan who is also a
citizen of the United States, the credit required to be granted against Kazakhstan tax on income
shall include a credit for the income tax paid by such individuals to the United States imposed
solely by reason of citizenship, subject only to a limitation of such credit to Kazakhstan tax on
income from all sources outside Kazakhstan.
b) The Republic of Kazakhstan confirms that in computing the taxes on profits and
income under current law, an entity that is a resident of Kazakhstan and is a joint venture with
participation by residents of the United States or which is wholly owned by residents of the
United States, or a permanent establishment (subject to the provisions of Article 6), is permitted
deductions for actual wages paid and for interest expense whether or not paid to a bank and
without regard to the term of the debt. The deduction may not exceed the limitation under
Kazakh tax law, as long as the limitation is not less than an arm's length rate taking into account
a reasonable risk premium.
c) It is understood that income tax paid by a Kazakh person which is treated as a
partnership under U.S. Federal income tax rules shall be treated for purposes of this Article as
paid by the U.S. partner, pursuant to the rules of the Internal Revenue Code.
d) Both sides agree that a tax sparing credit shall not be provided in Article 25 (Relief
from Double Taxation) of the Convention at this time. However, the Convention shall be
promptly amended to incorporate a tax sparing credit provision if the United States hereafter
amends its laws concerning the provision of tax sparing credits, or the United States reaches
agreement on the provision of a tax sparing credit with any other country.
9. With regard to Article 25,
When the competent authority of one of the Contracting States considers that the law of the other
Contracting State is or may be applied in a manner that eliminates or significantly limits a benefit
provided by the Convention, that State shall inform the other Contracting State in a
timely manner and may request consultations with a view to restoring the balance of benefits of the
Convention. If so requested, the other State shall begin such consultations within three months of the
date of such request.
If the Contracting States are unable to agree on the way in which the Convention should be modified to
restore the balance of benefits, the affected State may terminate the Convention in accordance with the
procedures of paragraph 1, notwithstanding the five year period referred to in that paragraph, or take
such other action regarding this Convention as may be permitted under the general principles of
international law.
10. With regard to Article 28,
Where any legal rules applicable as of the dates of entry into force of this Convention provided
greater benefits with respect to taxation than are provided under this Convention, the taxpayer may elect
to apply those rules, in their entirety, for the first taxable year with respect to which the provisions of this
Convention would otherwise have effect under paragraph 2
FOR THE GOVERNMENT Of THE FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN:
(s) Warren Christopher(s)
TECHNICAL CHANGES
No. MFA 723/94
The Embassy of the United States of America presents its compliments to the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan and has the honor, on the instruction of the Department of State,
to convey the following with regard to the Convention between the United States of America and the
Republic of Kazakhstan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion
with respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, which was signed in Almaty on October 24, 1993;
During detailed review of the Convention prior to submission to the Senate for ratification, the
Department of the Treasury discovered minor technical errors in the original signed English and, in some
cases, Russian text. The United States proposes correcting these errors through an exchange of
diplomatic notes. The Ministry is requested to make these technical changes in the signed copies of the
Convention which are held in Kazakhstan. The Kazakh language version, currently in process of
conformation will also be amended to reflect these changes.
The full text or the changes required are as follows:
THE TECHNICAL CHANGES IN TEXT OF CONVENTION BETWEEN
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT
OF THE REPUBLIC OF Kazakhstan FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF
DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO
TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL
1. Throughout the Russian text of the Treaty and Protocol, replace “--(Russian text)--” with “--
(Russian Text)--”.
2. In paragraph 4 a) of Article 1 (General Scope), English and Russian texts, the phrase “paragraph
5 of Article 18", should be replaced by "paragraphs 1 b) and 5 of Article 18".
3. In paragraph 5 of Article 11 (Interest), English and Russian texts, the phrase "fixed base," should
be inserted twice in the last part of the paragraph. The corrected text should read "... and such interest is
borne by such permanent establishment, fixed base or trade or business subject to tax on a net basis,
then such interest shall be deemed to arise in the State in which the permanent
establishment fixed base or trade or business is situated."

4. In paragraph 5 of Article 13 (Gains), English text, the word "enterprises" should be deleted. The
corrected text reads “gains derived by a resident of a contracting states......”
5. In paragraph 3 of Article 18 (Pension, Etc.). English text, there is an error in the second sentence.
It should refer to "at stated times” not "as stated times".
6. In paragraph 3 of Article 24 (Non-Discrimination), English and Russian texts, the cross-reference
should be to paragraph 6, Article 11 (Interest), not to paragraph 4.
7. In paragraph 1 of Article 28 (Entry Into Force.), English and Russian text, the blank should be
filled in with “Washington, D.C.”.
8. In point 3 c), of the protocol, English and Russian texts, the phrase “notwithstanding the
provisions of paragraph 1,” should read "Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3,".
9. In point 3 c), of the Protocol, English text, the reference would be to a “real estate mortgage
investment conduit”, not to “real mortgage interest conduit”.
10. In point 8 b) of the Protocol, English and Russian text, the final sentence should begin “in the case
of interest the deduction.........”. The words "in the case of interest" were omitted by mistake.
11. In point 8 d) of the Protocol, English text, the correct cross-reference is to Article 23, not 25.
12. In point 9 of the Protocol, English and Russian text in the second paragraph, after the reference
to “Paragraph 1" the words “of Article 29 (Termination,” need to be inserted.)
End Changes.
Following notification to the embassy from the Ministry that these corrections (suggested draft
attached) have been made in the copy held by Kazakhstan the Embassy will correct the file copies and
so inform the Department of State. The corrections will also be made in the copy held in Washington.
The exchange of diplomatic notes would be considered a correction of the Convention and will become
part of the official treaty record, but will not be considered by the United States to be an amendment of
the Convention. The Convention will be printed in the Treaties and Other International Acts Series as
corrected.
The Embassy avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs the
assurances of its highest consideration.
Embassy of the United States of America
Almaty, Kazakhstan
August 1, 1994

NOTES OF EXCHANGE 1
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
OFFICE OF LANGUAGE SERVICES
Translating Division
LS No. 145237a
Russian
TM/

REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
480091 Almaty 91, pr. Ablaykhana 97
Telegraph address: Almaty 91,
Teletype 251 “Filin” 64
Tel: 62-92-97, Fax: 8-327-62-27-70
September 7, 1994
No. F-2 [illegible]- 4- 1 [illegible]1/5731 [sic]
TO:
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Re:
Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with the U.S.
The Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan has reviewed note no. MFA 723 of August
1, 1984, from the Embassy of the United States of America concerning technical corrections to the
English and Russian texts of the Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention
of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital between the Republic of Kazakhstan
and the United States of America, signed on October
24, 1993, and consents to the incorporation of these changes into the originals of the texts on file in the
Republic of Kazakhstan.
The following is understood to be the procedure for incorporating the changes into the original texts
of the documents on file in Kazakhstan: the changes will not be physically entered directly on the signed

copies; rather, notes will be exchanged that contain references to the locations at which changes need to
be made. The original documents themselves will not be corrected and will remain unchanged. The
signed notes with a list of the technical corrections will be filed with the signed copies of the Convention
and will become a part of the official agreement.
After the exchange of notes consenting to the introduction of the relevant technical changes, the
amendments will be deemed to have been made and [subject indeterminate] will be printed in corrected
form upon publication in official editions of announcements of legislative acts of the highest legislative
bodies of both States.
The Kazakh-language version, which is in the process of conformance, will also be corrected to
reflect these changes.
In connection with the foregoing, the Ministry of Finance requests the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
the Republic of Kazakhstan to make the relevant corrections to the originals of the English and Russian
texts of the Convention on file in the Republic of Kazakhstan by transmitting a reply note to the
Embassy of the U.S. in Kazakhstan.
A draft note proposed by the U.S. and our version of the draft are attached, along with the text of
the technical changes in Russian.
Deputy Minister
[signature] B. Aymakov
Embassy of the United States of America

Almaty,
August 15, 1994
Mr. Yerkishbay Derbisov
Minister of Finance
Republic of Kazakhstan
Almaty
Excellency:
I have the honor to refer to the Convention between the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan
and the Government of the United States of America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the
Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, signed at Almaty on
October 24, 1993. There is attached to this note a Memorandum of Understanding with respect to

certain provisions of that Convention for the purpose of giving guidance both to the taxpayer; and the
tax authorities of our two countries in interpreting those provisions.
If the positions stated in the Memorandum of understanding meet with the approval of the
Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, this note and your note in reply thereto will indicate that our
governments share a common understanding.
Accept, Excellency, the expression of my highest consideration.
Sincerely,
(s) William Courtney
Ambassador
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF
THE CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF
KAZAKHSTAN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR
THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL
EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON `INCOME AND CAPITAL, SIGNED IN ALMATY
ON OCTOBER 24, 1993

1. WITH REFERENCE TO PARAGRAPH 5 OF ARTICLE 6 (BUSINESS PROFITS):
It is understood that this provision will be applied only in exceptional cases. Where books and
records audited by a certified public accountant are available to or readily obtainable by the competent
authority, they will be considered adequate information on which gross income and deductions may be
determined in order to measure the net income subject to tax.
2. WITH REFERENCE TO PARAGRAPH 1c) ARTICLE 14 (INDEPENDENT PERSONAL
SERVICES) AND PARAGRAPH 2a) OF ARTICLE 15 (INCOME FROM EMPLOYMENT):
The reference to “183 days in any consecutive twelve month period” or “183 days in any twelve
month period” means “183 days in any twelve month period beginning or ending in the taxable year
concerned”.
3. WITH REFERENCE TO PARAGRAPH 1c) OF ARTICLE 21 (LIMITATION ON
BENEFITS):
It is understood that the term “officially recognized exchange”, includes an exchange that is officially
recognized by either contracting state and that is agreed upon by the competent authorities of both
contracting states.
4. WITH REFERENCE TO POINT 3a) OF THE PROTOCOL:

It is understood that the phrase “both contracting states shall apply that lower rate” means that both
contracting states agree to promptly amend the convention to incorporate that lower rate.
5. WITH REFERENCE TO ARTICLE 26 (EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION):
Notwithstanding any provision of the law of either contracting state, the information that may be
exchanged under this article includes information from bank documents, including bank documents of
third parties involved in transactions with taxpayer(s), and the information will be made available in civil,
as well as criminal tax investigations.
NOTES OF EXCHANGE 2
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
OFFICE OF LANGUAGE SERVICES
Translating Division
LS No 145047b
Russian
TM/
Mr. William Courtney
Ambassador of the United States of America in Kazakhstan
Embassy of the United States of America
Mr. Ambassador:
The Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan has the honor to refer to the Convention
between the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Government of the United States of
America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to
Taxes on Income and Capital, signed in Almaty on October 24, 1993.
The Government of Kazakhstan approves the Memorandum of Understanding with Respect to
Certain Provisions of the Convention, which was submitted attached to your note no. MFA 765/94 of
August 15, 1994, authorizing the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan so to do.
Attached to this note is a translation of the English text of the Memorandum of Understanding with
Respect to Certain Provisions of the Convention, which [memorandum] clarifies certain provisions of
the Convention.
This note confirms that our governments have reached a mutual understanding on all articles of the
Convention, and that they will make an effort to have it ratified.
Sincerely,

Minister of Finance
Ye. Derbisov
RELATED NOTES
EXCHANGE OF NOTES RELATING TO THE TAX CONVENTION WITH KAZAKHSTAN
MESSAGE
FROM
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
TRANSMITTING
AN EXCHANGE OF NOTES DATED AT WASHINGTON JULY 10, 1995,
RELATING TO THE CONVENTION (SEE TREATY DOC. 103-33) BETWEEN THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION
AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO
TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL, TOGETHER WITH RELATED PROTOCOL, SIGNED
AT ALMATY ON OCTOBER 24, 1993
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL (NOTES)
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Washington, July 14, 1995.
The PRESIDENT,
The White House.
THE PRESIDENT: I have the honor to submit to you an exchange of notes, dated at Washington
July 10, 1995, with a view to transmission of these notes to the Senate for advice and consent to
ratification in connection with the Senate's consideration of the Convention Between the Government of
the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the Avoidance of
Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital,
together with a related Protocol, signed at Almaty on October 24, 1993, and exchanges of notes (the
"Taxation Convention").

This exchange of notes addresses the interaction between the Taxation Convention and other treaties
and agreements that have provisions affecting taxes.
The United States is a party to the General Agreement on Trade in Services ("GATS"), annexed to
the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, done at Marrakesh April 15, 1994. GATS
entered into force on January 1, 1995. Although the United States is a party to GATS, the Government
of Kazakhstan is not yet a party. The exchange of notes ensures first that, if Kazakhstan accedes to the
GATS and GATS obligations become applicable between the United States and Kazakhstan, the
dispute resolution mechanisms of the Taxation Convention would govern national treatment disputes
regarding taxation measures. The exchange of notes further provides that the non-discrimination
provisions of the Taxation Convention, rather than the national or most-favored-nation treatment
obligations of any other agreement (except for the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, if it applies
between the United States and Kazakhstan, and the Agreement on Trade Relations Between the United
States and Kazakhstan, signed on May 19, 1992) will apply to taxation measures except those outside
the scope of the Taxation Convention.
Provisions similar to those in this exchange of notes are included in the taxation conventions between
the United States and Portugal, Sweden, and France, which have been transmitted to the Senate.
The Department of Treasury and the Department of State cooperated in the negotiation of the
Convention and the most recent exchange of notes. The notes have the full approval of both
Departments.
Respectfully submitted,
WARREN CHRISTOPHER.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL (NOTES)
THE WHITE HOUSE, August 3, 1995.
To the Senate of the United States:
I transmit herewith an exchange of notes dated at Washington July 10, 1995, for Senate advice and
consent to ratification in connection with the Senate's consideration of the Convention Between the
Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the
Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income
and Capital, together with a related Protocol, signed at Almaty on October 24, 1993, and exchanges of
notes (the "Taxation Convention"). Also transmitted for the information of the Senate is the report of the
Department of State with respect to the exchange of notes.
This exchange of notes addresses the interaction between the Taxation Convention and other
treaties that have tax provisions, including in particular the General Agreement on Trade in Services

("GATS"), annexed to the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, done at Marrakesh
April 15, 1994.
I recommend that the Senate give favorable consideration to this exchange of notes and give its
advice and consent to ratification in connection with the Taxation Convention.
WILLIAM J. CLINTON.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
WASHINGTON
July 10, 1995
His Excellency
Touleotai Souleimenov,
Ambassador of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Excellency:
I have the honor to refer to the Convention between the Government of the United Stares of
America and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and
the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, together with a related
Protocol, signed at Almaty on October 24, 1993, and Exchanges of Notes ( Taxation Convention ) and
the General Agreement on Trade in Services (“GATS”).
The Government of the United States is a Party to the GATS, annexed to the Agreement
Establishing the World Trade Organization, done at Marrakesh April 15, 1994. The Government of
Kazakhstan is not yet a Party to the GATS. The United States and Kazakhstan have, however,
considered the relationship between the Taxation Convention and the GATS in the event that the GATS
applies between them, particularly with regard to the Consultation provision in Article XXII of the
GATS and the Most-Favored-Nation and National Treatment provisions in Articles II and XVII of the
GATS. In addition, the United States and Kazakhstan have considered the relationship between the
Taxation Convention and other agreements that apply between them and that have provisions
concerning national treatment or most-favored-nation treatment.
To address these issues, I have the honor to propose that:
(1) notwithstanding Article XXII and footnote 11 of the GATS, in the event that the GATS applies
between the United States and Kazakhstan, a dispute concerning whether a measure is within the scope
of the Taxation Convention shall be considered only pursuant to Article 25 (Mutual Agreement
procedure) of the Taxation Convention by the competent authorities of the United States and
Kazakhstan as defined in subparagraph l(h) of Article 3 (General Definitions); and

(2) unless the competent authorities determine that a taxation measure is not within the scope of the
Taxation Convention, national treatment or most-favored-nation obligations under any other agreement
(including GATS in the event that it applies between the United States and Kazakhstan) shall not apply
to a taxation measure, except for such national treatment or most-favored-nation obligations as may
apply to trade in goods under the Agreement on Trade Relations between the United States and
Kazakhstan, signed on May 19, 1992, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade if it applies
between the United States and Kazakhstan.
If this proposal is acceptable to the Government of Kazakhstan, I have the further honor to propose
that this note, and your Government's note in reply, shall constitute an agreement which shall enter into
force on the date the Taxation Convention enters into force
Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration.
For the Secretary of State:
(s) Alan Larson
EMBASSY OF KAZAKHSTAN
No 22
The Department of State
of the United States of America
Washington, D.C.
The Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the United States of America presents its compliments
to the Department of State of the United States of America and on instruction of the Government of the
Republic of Kazakhstan has the honor to convey the following.
"The Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan has the honor to reply to the Government of the
United States' note of July 10, 1995 concerning the Convention Between the Government of the
Republic of Kazakhstan and the United States of America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and
the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, together with a related
protocol, signed at Almaty on October 24, 1993 and Exchanges of Notes ("Taxation Convention"), and
the General Agreement on Trade in Services ("GATS").
The proposal contained in the aforementioned note reads as follows:
“(1) Notwithstanding Article XXII and footnote 11 of the GATS, in the event that the GATS
applies between the United States and Kazakhstan, a dispute concerning whether a measure is within
the scope of the Taxation Convention shall be considered only pursuant to Article 25 (Mutual

Agreement Procedure) of the Taxation Convention, by the competent authorities of the United States
and Kazakhstan, as defined in subparagraph 1 (h) of Article 3 (General Definitions); and
“(2) Unless the competent authorities determine that a taxation measure is not within the scope
of the Taxation Convention, National treatment, or Most-Favored-Nation obligations under any other
agreement (including GATS in the event that it applies between the United States and Kazakhstan shall
not apply to a taxation measure, except for such National treatment or Most-Favored-Nation
obligations as may apply to trade in goods under the Agreement on Trade Relations Between the United
States and Kazakhstan, signed on May 19, 1992, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, if it
applies between the United States and Kazakhstan."
The Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan is pleased to confirm that this proposal is acceptable to
the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and that the U.S. note of July 10, 1995 and this note
shall constitute an agreement which shall enter into force on the date the Taxation Convention enters into
force.”
The Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan avails itself of the opportunity to renew assurances of its
highest consideration to the Department of State of the United States of America.
Washington, July 10, 1995