Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-28 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Rulings

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
5-28
July 11, 2005
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2005–41, page 69.
Special use value; farms; interest rates.The 2005 interest
rates to be used in computing the special use value of farm real
property for which an election is made under section 2032A of
the Code are listed for estates of decedents.
Rev. Rul. 2
005–42, page 67.
Environme
ntal remediation costs.This ruling holds that en-
vironment
al remediation costs that are incurred to clean up land
that a taxp
ayer contaminated with hazardous waste by the op-
eration o
f the taxpayer’s manufacturing activities are incurred
by reason
of production activities and are properly allocable un-
der secti
on 263A of the Code to the inventory produced during
the taxab
le year the costs are incurred. Rev. Proc. 2002–9
modified
and amplified.
Notice 2005–51, page 74.
Tobacco quota termination payments.This notice provides
guidance in a Q&A format regarding the tax treatment of pay-
ments made to eligible tobacco quota holders for the termi-
nation of tobacco marketing quotas and related price support
programs under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
Rev. Proc. 2005–35, page 76.
Utilities; taxable income.For federal income tax purposes,
if certain conditions are satisfied, a utility may treat an up-front
payment for network upgrades as not being taxable income
under section 61 when received. Rev. Proc. 2002–9 modified
and amplified.
EMPLOYMENT TAX
Rev. Proc. 2005–39, page 82.
This procedure updates Rev. Rul. 82–29 to allow corporate
officers or authorized agents to sign additional employment
tax related documents using alternative signature methods.
Rev. Rul. 82–29 modified and clarified.
TAX CONVENTIONS
Announcement 2005–47, page 71.
This announcement provides a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) between the Competent Authorities of the United States
and Canada regarding the mutual agreement procedure (MAP)
process in accordance with the terms set forth in the United
States – Canada income tax convention. The MOU establishes
principles and guidelines to improve the performance and effi-
ciency of the MAP process.
ADMINIS
TRATIVE
Notice 2
005–52, page 75.
This not
ice provides that, in the case of bonds subject to the
1989 reg
ulations or the 1992 regulations, rebate payments
must be f
iled at the same place designated by the Commis-
sioner
for bonds subject to section 1.148–3 of the regulations.
(Continued on the next page)
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

Rev. Proc. 2005–36, page 78.
Low-income housing tax credit.This procedure publishes
the amounts of unused housing credit carryovers allocated to
qualified states under section 42(h)(3)(D) of the Code for cal-
endar year 2005.
Rev. Proc. 2005–37, page 79.
This procedure establishes a safe harbor under which housing
credit agencies and project owners may meet the requirements
of section 42(h)(6)(B)(i) of the Code as described in Q&A-5
of Rev. Rul. 2004–82, 2004–35 I.R.B. 350, concerning ex-
tended low-income housing commitments.
Rev. Proc. 2005–38, page 81.
This procedure describes how taxpayers may seek administra-
tive relief when the Service has assessed interest for periods
during which interest should have been suspended under sec-
tion 6404(g) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2005–39, page 82.
This procedure updates Rev. Rul. 82–29 to allow corporate
officers or authorized agents to sign additional employment
tax related documents using alternative signature methods.
Rev. Rul. 82–29 modified and clarified.
Rev. Proc. 2005–40, page 83.
This procedure provides issuers of state or local bonds subject
to Code section 148(f)(3) and regulations section 1.148–3(g)
with procedures for correcting a failure to timely pay the proper
amount of arbitrage rebate. The procedure also modifies Rev.
Proc. 90–11, 1990–1 C.B. 469, which provides similar proce-
dures for bonds subject to regulations section 1.148–1T. The
modification provides a new address for filing late rebate pay-
ments and related requests. Rev. Proc. 90–11 modified.
July 11, 20052005–28 I.R.B.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
2005–28 I.R.B.July 11, 2005

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 42.—Low-Income
Housing Credit
26 CFR 1.42–14: Allocation rules for post-1989
State housing credit ceiling amounts.
Guidance is provided to state housing credit agen-
cies of qualified states that request an allocation
of unused housing credit carryover under section
42(h)(3)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code. See Rev.
Proc. 2005-36, page 78.
26 CFR 1.42–5: Monitoring compliance with low-
income housing credit requirements.
A safe harbor is provided under which housing
credit agencies and project owners may meet the re-
quirements of section 42(h)(6)(B)(i) of the Internal
Revenue Code as described in Q&A-5 of Rev. Rul.
2004–82, 2004–35 I.R.B. 350, concerning extended
low-income housing commitments. See Rev. Proc.
2005-37, page 79.
Section 263A.—Capital-
ization and Inclusion in
Inventory Costs of Cer-
tain Expenses
26 CFR 1.263A–1: Uniform capitalization of costs.
Environmental remediation costs.
This ruling holds that environmental re-
mediation costs that are incurred to clean
up land that a taxpayer contaminated with
hazardous waste by the operation of the
taxpayer’s manufacturing activities are
incurred by reason of production activities
and are properly allocable under section
263A of the Code to the inventory pro-
duced during the taxable year the costs
are incurred. Rev. Proc. 2002–9 modified
and amplified.
Rev. Rul. 2005–42
ISSUE
Are environmental remediation costs
incurred to clean up land that a taxpayer
contaminated with hazardous waste by the
operation of the taxpayer’s manufacturing
activities properly allocable under § 263A
of the Internal Revenue Code to the inven-
tory produced during the taxable year the
costs are incurred?
FACTS
Situation 1.N, a corporation using an
accrual method of accounting, owns land
and operates a manufacturing plant on Site
XthatNuses to produce stoves. Stoves are
the only property produced byNand are
inventory inN’s hands.N’s manufactur-
ing activities discharge hazardous waste.
In the past,Nburied this waste on portions
of SiteXin accordance with then applica-
ble law. SiteXwas not contaminated by
hazardous waste when purchased byN.
In order to comply with federal, state,
and local environmental requirements,N
incurs costs in 2005 to remediate the con-
taminated soil and groundwater at SiteX.
The costsNincurs are not research and ex-
perimental expenditures within the mean-
ing of § 174, qualified environmental re-
mediation expenditures within the mean-
ing of § 198(b), or environmental man-
agement policy costs. The soil remedi-
ation and groundwater treatment restores
SiteXto essentially the same physical con-
dition that existed prior to the contamina-
tion. The soil remediation and ground-
water treatment does not materially add to
the value of SiteX, appreciably prolong its
life, or adapt it to a new or different use.
During and after the remediation,Ncon-
tinues to manufacture stoves at SiteX.
Situation 2. The facts are the same as
inSituation 1, except thatNmanufactures
clothes washers at SiteXandnolonger
manufactures stoves. Clothes washers are
the only property produced byNand are
inventory inN’s hands.
Situation 3. The facts are the same as
inSituation 1, except thatNtemporarily
ceases its manufacturing activities at Site
Xduring a part of 2005 while it remediates
the contaminated soil and groundwater.
Situation 4. The facts are the same as in
Situation 1, except thatNhas permanently
ceased its manufacturing activities at Site
Xand manufactures stoves at another site.
Situation 5. The facts are the same as
inSituation 1, except that in the pastN
buried the waste on portions of SiteY,a
remote dump site thatNdid not own or
otherwise use in its manufacturing activ-
ities.Nwas not obligated to clean up the
site whenNburied the waste. In order to
comply with federal, state, and local en-
vironmental requirements,Nincurs costs
in 2005 to remediate the contaminated soil
and groundwater at SiteY.Thesoilreme-
diation and groundwater treatment restores
SiteYto essentially the same physical con-
dition that existed prior to the contamina-
tion. The soil remediation and groundwa-
ter treatment does not materially add to the
value of any ofN’s property, appreciably
prolong its life, or adapt it to a new or dif-
ferent use. During and after the remedia-
tion,Ncontinues to manufacture stoves at
SiteX, but has permanently stopped using
SiteYto bury waste.
LAW
Section 263A(a) provides that the direct
costs and indirect costs properly allocable
to property that is inventory in the hands
of the taxpayer are included in inventory
costs.
Section 1.263A–1(a)(3)(ii) of the In-
come Tax Regulations provides, in part,
that taxpayers that produce tangible per-
sonal property must capitalize (1) all direct
costs of producing the property, and (2) the
property’s properly allocable share of indi-
rect costs.
Section 1.263A–1(c)(1) provides that to
determine these capitalizable costs, tax-
payers must allocate or apportion costs to
various activities, including production ac-
tivities. Section 1.263A–1(c)(1) further
provides that after § 263A costs are allo-
cated to the appropriate production activi-
ties, these costs generally are allocated to
the items of property produced during the
taxable year and capitalized to the items
that remain on hand at the end of the tax-
able year. As a result, costs incurred during
the taxable year are either included in the
cost of goods sold during the taxable year
or are capitalized to the items that remain
on hand at the end of the taxable year using
a method permitted under § 1.263A–1(f).
Section 1.263A–1(c)(2)(ii) provides
that the amount of any cost required to
be capitalized under § 263A may not
be included in inventory or charged to
capital accounts or basis any earlier
than the taxable year during which the
2005–28 I.R.B.67July 11, 2005

amount is incurred within the meaning of
§ 1.446–1(c)(1)(ii).
Section 1.263A–1(c)(3) provides that
capitalize means, in the case of property
that is inventory in the hands of a taxpayer,
to include in inventory costs.
Section 1.263A–1(c)(4) provides that
costs that are capitalized under § 263A are
recovered through depreciation, amortiza-
tion, cost of goods sold, or by an adjust-
ment to basis at the time the property is
used, sold, placed in service, or otherwise
disposed of by the taxpayer.
Section 1.263A–1(e)(3)(i) provides, in
part, that indirect costs are properly allo-
cable to property produced when the costs
directly benefit or are incurred by reason
of the performance of production activi-
ties. Generally, producers must capitalize
direct and indirect costs properly allocable
to property produced under § 263A, with-
out regard to whether those costs are in-
curred before, during, or after production.
See § 1.263A–2(a)(3)(i).
Section 1.263A–1(e)(3)(ii) provides
examples of indirect costs that must be
capitalized to the extent they are prop-
erly allocable to property produced. In-
direct costs required to be capitalized
include the costs of repairing and main-
taining production equipment or facilities.
See § 1.263A–1(e)(3)(ii)(O). In addi-
tion, costs related to temporarily idle
production equipment or facilities, other
than depreciation, amortization and cost
recovery allowances, are indirect costs
that are required to be capitalized. See
§ 1.263A–1(e)(3)(iii)(E).
Rev. Rul. 94–38, 1994–1 C.B. 35,
holds that costs incurred to clean up land
and to treat groundwater contaminated
with hazardous waste from the taxpayer’s
business are not capital expenditures under
§ 263 because these costs do not materially
add value to the land, prolong the useful
life of the land or adapt the land to a new
or different use and, therefore, such costs
are deductible by the taxpayer as business
expenses under § 162. Costs incurred for
constructing groundwater treatment facil-
ities, however, are capital expenditures
under § 263.
Rev. Rul. 2004–18, 2004–1 C.B. 509,
considers whether costsincurredtoclean
up land that a taxpayer contaminated with
hazardous waste by the operation of the
taxpayer’s manufacturing activities are in-
cludible in inventory costs under § 263A.
Rev. Rul. 2004–18 states that the hold-
ing of Rev. Rul. 94–38 that the costs to
construct a groundwater treatment facility
must be capitalized under §§ 263(a) and
263A, rather than deducted under § 162,
demonstrates the distinction between cap-
ital expenditures and costs that are more in
the nature of repairs than capital improve-
ments. As with other types of deductible
business costs, such as labor costs, taxes,
rent, and supplies, once repair costs are de-
termined to be deductible under § 162, a
taxpayer with inventories still must apply
the rules of § 263A to determine whether
the repair costs must be included in inven-
tory. Rev. Rul. 2004–18 concludes, there-
fore, that environmental remediation costs
similarly are subject to capitalization un-
der § 263A and are required to be included
in inventory costs under the facts of that
ruling.
ANALYSIS
Environmental remediation costs in-
curred to clean up land and to treat ground-
water that a taxpayer contaminated with
hazardous waste from its production ac-
tivities do not materially add to the value
of the land, appreciably prolong its life,
or adapt it to a new or different use. Rev.
Rul. 94–38. Thus, these costs are more in
the nature of repairs than capital improve-
ments and, under § 263A, are indirect costs
that must be included in inventory costs
to the extent allocable to inventory. Rev.
Rul. 2004–18. Generally, repair costs
incurred to keep equipment or facilities
used in production activities in an ordinar-
ily efficient operating condition directly
benefit or are incurred by reason of the
performance of the production activities
and, therefore, are properly allocable to
inventory, without regard to whether those
costs are incurred before, during, or after
production. See §§ 1.263A–1(e)(3)(i),
1.263A–1(e)(3)(ii)(O) and 1.263A–2(a)
(3)(i). Under §§ 1.263A–1(c)(1) and
1.263A–1(c)(2), these repair costs are al-
locable to the property produced during
the taxable year in which the costs are
incurred, even though the repairs may
have been necessitated by the use of the
equipment or facilities in the production
of property in prior taxable periods.
Like repair costs, environmental re-
mediation costs incurred by a taxpayer
to clean up land and to treat groundwa-
ter that the taxpayer contaminated with
hazardous waste from its production ac-
tivities are costs that directly benefit or
are incurred by reason of the performance
of the production activities even if the
condition that necessitated the remedia-
tion arose during prior taxable periods.
See § 1.263A–2(a)(3)(i). As with repair
costs, environmental remediation costs are
properly allocable to inventory without
regard to whether those costs are incurred
before, during, or after production. See
§ 1.263A–1(c)(2). Likewise, remediation
costs are allocable under § 1.263A–1(c)(1)
to the property produced during the tax-
able year in which the costs are incurred.
InSituation 1, during 2005,Nmanufac-
tures stoves at SiteX.ThecostsNincurs
in 2005 to clean up SiteXare incurred by
reason ofN’s production activities, within
the meaning of § 1.263A–1(e)(3)(i). Be-
cause the environmental remediation costs
to clean up SiteXare incurred in 2005,
they are properly allocable to the inventory
produced byNin 2005, in accordance with
§§ 1.263A–1(c)(1) and 1.263A–1(c)(2).
Therefore, the environmental remediation
costs are allocable tothe stoves produced
byNduring 2005, using an allocation
method permitted under § 1.263A–1(f).
InSituation 2, during 2005,Nman-
ufactures clothes washers at SiteX.The
costsNincurs in 2005 to clean up Site
Xare incurred by reason ofN’s produc-
tion activities, within the meaning of
§ 1.263A–1(e)(3)(i). Because the en-
vironmental remediation costs to clean
up SiteXare incurred in 2005, they are
properly allocable to the inventory pro-
duced byNin 2005, in accordance with
§§ 1.263A–1(c)(1) and 1.263A–1(c)(2).
Therefore, the environmental remediation
costs are allocable to the clothes wash-
ers produced byNduring 2005, using
an allocation method permitted under
§1.263A–1(f).
InSituation 3, during a part of 2005,
SiteXis temporarily idle. Neverthe-
less, the costsNincurs in 2005 to clean
up SiteXare incurred by reason of
N’s production activities, within the
meaning of § 1.263A–1(e)(3)(i). See
§ 1.263A–2(a)(3)(i). Because the en-
vironmental remediation costs to clean
up SiteXare incurred in 2005, they are
properly allocable to the inventory pro-
duced byNin 2005, in accordance with
§§ 1.263A–1(c)(1) and 1.263A–1(c)(2).
July 11, 2005682005–28 I.R.B.

Therefore, the environmental remediation
costs are allocable to the stoves produced
byNduring 2005, using an allocation
method permitted under § 1.263A–1(f).
InSituation 4,Nhas permanently
ceased its manufacturing activities at Site
X. Nevertheless, the costsNincurs in
2005 to clean up SiteXare incurred by
reason ofN’s production activities, within
the meaning of § 1.263A–1(e)(3)(i). See
§ 1.263A–2(a)(3)(i). Because the en-
vironmental remediation costs to clean
up SiteXare incurred in 2005, they are
properly allocable to the inventory pro-
duced byNin 2005, in accordance with
§§ 1.263A–1(c)(1) and 1.263A–1(c)(2).
Therefore, the environmental remediation
costs are allocable to the stoves produced
byNduring 2005, using an allocation
method permitted under § 1.263A–1(f).
InSituation 5,Nhas permanently
ceased burying waste from its manu-
facturing activities on SiteY. Never-
theless, the costsNincurs in 2005 to
clean up SiteYare incurred by reason
ofN’s production activities, within the
meaning of § 1.263A–1(e)(3)(i). See
§ 1.263A–2(a)(3)(i). Because the en-
vironmental remediation costs to clean
up SiteYare incurred in 2005, they are
properly allocable to the inventory pro-
duced byNin 2005, in accordance with
§§ 1.263A–1(c)(1) and 1.263A–1(c)(2).
Therefore, the environmental remediation
costs are allocable to the stoves produced
byNduring 2005, using an allocation
method permitted under § 1.263A–1(f).
HOLDING
Environmental remediation costs that
are incurred to clean up land that a tax-
payer contaminated with hazardous waste
by the operation of the taxpayer’s manu-
facturing activities are incurred by reason
of the taxpayer’s production activities and
are properly allocable under § 263A to the
inventory produced during the taxable year
the costs are incurred.
CHANGE IN METHOD OF
ACCOUNTING
A taxpayer using a method of account-
ing that does not comply with this revenue
ruling is using an impermissible method
of accounting. Any change in a taxpayer’s
treatment of environmental remediation
costs to conform with this revenue ruling
is a change in method of accounting to
which the provisions of §§ 446 and 481
and the regulations thereunder apply.
A taxpayer changing its method of ac-
counting to comply with this revenue rul-
ing must file a Form 3115 in accordance
with the automatic change in method of ac-
counting provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002–9,
2002–1 C.B. 327, as modified and clari-
fied by Announcement 2002–17, 2002–1
C.B. 561, modified and amplified by Rev.
Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696, and
amplified, clarified, and modified by Rev.
Proc. 2002- 54, 2002–2 C.B. 432, except
that the scope limitations in section 4.02 of
Rev. Proc. 2002–9 do not apply to a tax-
payer that makes the change for its first or
second taxable year ending after February
6, 2004. A taxpayer that files Form 3115
to comply with Rev. Rul. 2004–18 and
this revenue ruling for its first taxable year
ending after February 6, 2004, may effect
the change using either a § 481(a) adjust-
ment as provided in sections 5.03 and 5.04
of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 or a cut-off method.
See Rev. Rul. 2004–18. Additionally, a
taxpayer that (1) files a Form 3115 on or
before July 20, 2005, to comply with Rev.
Rul. 2004–18 for its first taxable year end-
ing after February 6, 2004, or was not re-
quired to change its method of account-
ing to comply with Rev. Rul. 2004–18,
and (2) files Form 3115 to comply with
this revenue ruling for its first taxable year
ending after June 20, 2005, may effect the
change using either a § 481(a) adjustment
or a cut-off method.
ForpurposesofLine1aofForm3115
(revised December 2003), the designated
number for the automatic accounting
method change authorized by this revenue
ruling is “92.” A taxpayer making the
automatic change in method of account-
ing authorized by this revenue ruling and
another automatic change in method of
accounting under § 263A for the same
taxable year may file one Form 3115 to
make both changes, but must comply with
the ordering rules of § 1.263A–7(b)(2)
and must enter the automatic accounting
method change numbers for both changes
on Line 1a of Form 3115 (revised Decem-
ber 2003).
EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 2002–9 is modified and
amplified to include in the APPENDIX the
automatic change provided in this revenue
ruling.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
ruling is John Roman Faron of the Of-
fice of Associate Chief Counsel (Income
Tax & Accounting). For further infor-
mation regarding this revenue ruling,
contact Mr. Faron at 202–622–4930 (not
a toll-free call).
Section 446.—General Rule
for Methods of Accounting
If certain conditions are satisfied, a Utility has au-
tomatic consent to change to a method under which
it may treat an Up-front Payment for Network Up-
grades as not being taxable income when received.
See Rev. Proc. 2005-35, page 76.
Section 451.—General Rule
for Taxable Year of Inclusion
For federal income tax purposes, if certain con-
ditions are satisfied, a Utility may treat an Up-front
Payment for Network Upgrades as not being taxable
income when received. See Rev. Proc. 2005-35,
page 76.
Section 2032A.—Valuation
of Certain Farm, etc.,
Real Property
26 CFR 20.2032A–4: Method of valuing farm real
property.
Special use value; farms; interest
rates.The 2005 interest rates to be used
in computing the special use value of farm
real property for which an election is made
under section 2032A of the Code are listed
for estates of decedents.
Rev. Rul. 2005–41
This revenue ruling contains a list of the
average annual effective interest rates on
new loans under the Farm Credit System.
This revenue ruling also contains a list of
the states within each Farm Credit System
Bank Chartered Territory.
Under § 2032A(e)(7)(A)(ii) of the In-
ternal Revenue Code, rates on new Farm
Credit System Bank loans are used in com-
puting the special use value of real prop-
erty used as a farm for which an election
is made under § 2032A. The rates in this
2005–28 I.R.B.69July 11, 2005

revenue ruling may be used by estates that
value farmland under § 2032A as of a date
in 2005.
Average annual effective interest
rates, calculated in accordance with
§ 2032A(e)(7)(A) and § 20.2032A–4(e)
of the Estate Tax Regulations, to be used
under § 2032A(e)(7)(A)(ii), are set forth in
the accompanying Table of Interest Rates
(Table 1). The states within each Farm
Credit System Bank Chartered Territory
are set forth in the accompanying Table
of Farm Credit System Bank Chartered
Territories (Table 2).
Rev. Rul. 81–170, 1981–1 C.B. 454,
contains an illustrative computation of an
average annual effective interest rate. The
rates applicable for valuation in 2004 are
in Rev. Rul. 2004–63, 2004–27 I.R.B.
6. For rate information for years prior to
2004, see Rev. Rul. 2003–53, 2003–1
C.B. 969, and other revenue rulings that
are referenced therein.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue rul-
ing is Lane Damazo of the Office of the As-
sociate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries). For further informa-
tion regarding this revenue ruling, contact
Lane Damazo at (202) 622–3090 (not a
toll-free call).
REV. RUL. 2005–41 TABLE 1
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES
(Year of Valuation 2005)
Farm Credit System Bank Servicing State in
Which Property is LocatedRate
AgFirst,FCB ....................................................................... 7.68
AgriBank,FCB ..................................................................... 6.44
CoBank,ACB ...................................................................... 5.91
Texas,FCB ........................................................................ 6.11
U.S.AgBank,FCB.................................................................. 6.25
REV. RUL. 2004–41 TABLE 2
TABLE OF FARM CREDIT SYSTEM BANK CHARTERED TERRITORIES
Farm Credit System BankLocation of Property
AgFirst
,FCB ............................................
Delawar
e, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland,
North Ca
rolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia,
West Vir
ginia.
AgriBank,FCB .......................................... Arkansas,Illinois,Indiana,Iowa,Kentucky,Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
CoBank
,ACB ...........................................
Alaska
, Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Montana,
New Ham
pshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon,
Rhode I
sland, Vermont, Washington.
Texas,FCB.............................................. Alabama,Louisiana,Mississippi,Texas.
U.S.Agbank,FCB........................................ Arizona,California,Colorado,Hawaii,Kansas,NewMexico,
Nevada, Oklahoma, Utah
Section 6011.—General
Requirement of Return,
Statement, or List
A revenue procedure sets out the circumstances
under which facsimile signatures may be used on any
form within the Form 94X series. See Rev. Proc.
2005-39, page 82.
July 11, 2005702005–28 I.R.B.

Part II. Treaties and Tax Legislation
Subpart A.—Tax Conventions and Other Related Items
Canadian Memorandum of
Understanding on Mutual
Agreement Procedure
Announcement 2005–47
ThefollowingisacopyoftheNewsRe-
lease issued by the Director, International
(U.S. Competent Authority) on June 15,
2005 (IR–2005–66).
Memorandum of Understanding
Between the Competent Authorities
of the United States and Canada
Regarding the Mutual Agreement
Procedure
IR–2005–66, June 15, 2005
WASHINGTON — On June 3, 2005,
the Competent Authorities of the United
States and Canada entered into a Mem-
orandum of Understanding (MOU) to
establish principles and guidelines to im-
prove the performance and efficiency of
the mutual agreement procedure (MAP)
process in accordance with the terms set
forth in theUnited States — Canada In-
come Tax Convention (1980),asamended
from time to time.
The fundamental purpose of the mutual
agreement procedure is to endeavor to re-
solve double taxation or taxation contrary
to a convention. Upon making a MAP
request, the taxpayer places responsibil-
ity for a principled and timely resolution
of the issue in the hands of the respective
Competent Authorities and the manner in
which the resolution of double taxation is
accomplished is at the discretion of the
Competent Authorities. It is for this rea-
son the two Competent Authorities have
reached the understandings outlined in the
MOU.
The text of the Memorandum of Under-
standing is as follows:
MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES
OF CANADA AND THE UNITED
STATES REGARDING THE MUTUAL
AGREEMENT PROCEDURE
The Director General, International Tax
Directorate, Canada Customs and Rev-
enue Agency (CCRA), Competent Au-
thority for Canada and the Director-Inter-
national, Large and Medium Size Busi-
ness (LMSB), Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Competent Authority for the United
States through this Memorandum of Un-
derstanding (“MOU”) agree to establish
principles and guidelines to improve the
performance and efficiency of the mutual
agreement procedure (“MAP”) process in
accordance with the terms set forth in the
Canada-United States Income Tax Con-
vention (1980), as amended from time to
time (the “Convention”).
Purpose of the MAP
The fundamental purpose of the MAP
is to endeavour to resolve double taxa-
tion or taxation contrary to a convention.
Upon making a MAP request, the taxpayer
places responsibility for a principled and
timely resolution of the issue in the hands
of the respective Competent Authorities
and the manner in which the resolution of
double taxation is accomplished is at the
discretion of the Competent Authorities.
It is for this reason that the two Competent
Authorities have reached the following
understandings:
I.Emphasis on Reaching Agreement.
The Competent Authorities for
Canada and the United States are
committed to the principle that the
resolution of double taxation or taxa-
tion contrary to the Convention should
be possible in all cases. To improve
the MAP process between our two
countries, the Competent Authorities
agree to adhere to the following prin-
ciples and guidelines when seeking to
reach a resolution in a particular case:
A.Positions shall be Principled,
Reasonable and Consistent.The
positions advanced by the Com-
petent Authorities in each case
should be well documented, have
merit, and follow the principles
of consistency and reciprocity.
Consistency means the Com-
petent Authorities will strive
to ensure that similar cases are
resolved in a similar manner.
Reciprocity means the adjusting
Competent Authority in a partic-
ular case should only advance a
position that it would be prepared
to accept if it were the relieving
Competent Authority.
B.Agreement on the Facts.The
Competent Authorities recognize
the importance of reaching agree-
ment on the facts in MAP cases.
Disagreements on the facts as to
the nature of a taxpayer’s busi-
ness operations can cause, or con-
tribute to, difficulties in resolving
a MAP case. Generally speak-
ing, the Competent Authorities
shall accept a transaction as struc-
tured by the taxpayer and only
consider disregarding or restruc-
turing a transaction in exceptional
cases.
If the Competent Authorities are
unable to obtain agreement on
the underlying facts and circum-
stances of a particular MAP case
after six months of negotiations,
they shall agree to refer the case
to a joint panel comprised of tax
administration officials chosen
by the Assistant Commissioner
of Appeals for the CCRA and the
ChiefofAppealsfortheIRS.An
agreement reached as to the facts
of the case will be binding on the
respective MAP organizations.
The details of this procedure will
be set forth in a separate MOU
between the Competent Authori-
ties.
The Competent Authorities agree
to consider conducting joint site
visits with taxpayers in specific
2005–28 I.R.B.71July 11, 2005

cases in an effort to reach agree-
ment regarding the underlying
facts and circumstances of a tax-
payer’s business; however, it is
recognized that the use of joint
site visits must be prudent and
judicious, due to resource limita-
tions in each of the respective tax
administrations.
C.Means of Resolving Cases.De-
spite the best efforts of Compe-
tent Authority officers, it is rec-
ognized that substantive differ-
ences on issues may complicate
the ability to reach a resolution on
a specific case even when there
is an agreement on the underly-
ing facts and circumstances of the
case.
In these situations, Competent
Authority officers shall look for
appropriate opportunities to com-
promise. Compromise is often
required when diverging views
otherwisemakeresolutiondiffi-
cult to achieve.
If resolution is still not possi-
ble, the appropriate first level
managers in the Competent Au-
thority organizations will jointly
undertake a detailed review of
the case to ensure that all appro-
priate action has been taken to
facilitate a resolution. If a MAP
request has not been resolved
within two years from the date of
acceptance, the Director General,
International Tax Directorate,
CCRA and the Director-Interna-
tional, LMSB, IRS agree to meet,
or, if more appropriate, agree to
have their subordinates meet, in
order to resolve the case.
II.Procedural Issues. Procedural issues
may delay or impede the resolution of
MAP cases. These issues could result
from administrative policies, prac-
tices and procedures of the respective
Competent Authority organizations.
A.RemovalofBarriers. It is hereby
agreed that administrative poli-
cies, procedures and practices
that impede or delay the process
of resolving a MAP case will
be identified and removed to the
extent possible under the dele-
gated powers of the Competent
Authorities in their respective tax
administrations.
B.Notification. The Competent Au-
thorities also agree to interpret
“notification” broadly under the
Convention so as to reflect the in-
tention to be as inclusive as pos-
sible when considering requests
for MAP assistance. A separate
MOUtobeexecutedbytheCom-
petent Authorities will address a
number of issues surrounding no-
tification.
III.Substantive Issues in MAP Cases.The
Competent Authorities will follow the
OECD’sTransfer Pricing Guidelines
for Multinational Enterprises and Tax
Administrationsto resolve substantive
issues in cases involving transactions
between related parties. Notwith-
standing, the Competent Authorities
have identified a number of issues
that have resulted, or could result, in
a failure to resolve double taxation or
taxation contrary to the Convention.
These issues include, but are not lim-
ited to, the determination of:
•an arm’s length compensation for
consignment manufacturing oper-
ations;
•whether a business is integrated
to the point where a profit split
method is appropriate and, if so,
the relative value of contributions
made by related parties toward the
generation of profit;
•the presence of non-routine intan-
gible assets and the determination
of an arm’s length value;
•whether a permanent establish-
ment (PE) exists and the amount
of profit to be attributable to the
PE;
•whether a transaction is properly
characterized as a service versus a
license of intangibles;
•the amount of compensation, if
any, upon either the closure or re-
location of a business and the allo-
cation of associated closing costs;
and
•appropriate relief where source
and residence country’s laws are
in conflict.
The Competent Authorities express their
commitment to reach an agreement estab-
lishing guidelines to be applied to resolv-
ing cases involving the issues identified
above as well as other issues that are iden-
tified and agreed to by the Competent Au-
thorities. The Director General, Interna-
tional Tax Directorate, CCRA and the Di-
rector-International, LMSB, IRS will des-
ignate one or more representatives from
their respective organizations to meet for
the purpose of establishing such guidelines
for the above issues as well as other issues
that are identified and agreed to. More-
over, the Director General, International
Tax Directorate, CCRA and the Director-
International, LMSB, IRS agree to des-
ignate one or more representatives from
their respective competent authority orga-
nizations to meet at such time as new is-
sues emerge that impede the resolution of
MAP cases. The Director General, Inter-
national Tax Directorate, CCRA and the
Director-International, LMSB, IRS recog-
nize that they may be required to look be-
yond their own Competent Authority or-
ganizations to find a designate elsewhere
within their respective tax administration
with the appropriate level of expertise to
assist in developing guidelines.
Conclusion
Through the execution of this MOU, our
respective Competent Authority organiza-
tions will initiate discussions as soon as
possible to: (1) create a MOU to establish
a binding procedure to determine the un-
derlying facts and circumstances of a spe-
cific case; (2) create a set of guidelines to
be used in resolving cases involving the
above substantive issues that complicate
case resolution; (3) identify and remove
procedural obstacles that impede or delay
the process of resolving double taxation
cases; and (4) create a MOU to address a
number of issues surrounding notification.
July 11, 2005722005–28 I.R.B.

Other Provisions
The Competent Authorities for Canada
and the United States agree to publish this
MOU to demonstrate our mutual commit-
ment to improving the MAP process.
This is a MOU between the Competent
Authorities of Canada and the United
States addressing procedural matters un-
der the Convention. This MOU is not to
be interpreted as creating any cause of
action, rights or benefits in favor of third
parties or taxpayers.
This MOU may be modified at any time
by agreement between the Competent
Authorities. The Competent Authorities
agree to implement this MOU as soon as
possible after signing this agreement. Ei-
ther Competent Authority may terminate
the MOU at any time by giving written
notice to the other Competent Authority.
Competent Authority for CanadaCompetent Authority for the United States
Frederick R. O’Riordan
Director General
International Tax Directorate
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency
Robert H. Green
Director-International
Large and Medium Size Business
Internal Revenue Service
Date:
Date:
2005–28 I.R.B.73July 11, 2005

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Termination of Tobacco
Quotas and Price Support
Programs
Notice 2005–51
PURPOSE
This notice provides answers to fre-
quently asked questions regarding the tax
treatment of federal payments made pur-
suant to § 622 of the Fair and Equitable
Tobacco Reform Act of 2004, Title VI of
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,
Pub. L. No. 108–357, 118 Stat. 1418,
1521–36 (2004) (the Act).
BACKGROUND
Sections 611 and 612 of the Act ter-
minate the tobacco marketing quota pro-
gram and the tobacco price support pro-
gram. Section 622 of the Act provides that
the United States Department of Agricul-
ture (USDA) will offer to enter into a con-
tract with an eligibletobacco quota holder
(Owner) under which the Owner may re-
ceive total payments of $7 per pound of
quota in 10 equal annual payments in fis-
cal years 2005 through 2014 (Owner Pay-
ments) in exchange for the termination of
the tobacco marketing quotas and related
price support. Section 622 does not pro-
vide for stated interest on payments due
under the contracts.
For federal income tax purposes,
Owner Payments are the proceeds from a
sale of the Owner’s tobacco quota as of
the effective date applicable to the Owner.
The effective date applicable to an Owner
is the earlier of (1) June 30, 2005, for
flue-cured tobacco and September 30,
2005, for all other types of tobacco, or (2)
the date on which an Owner and USDA
enter into a contract for Owner Payments
with respect to the quota.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q–1. Are Owner Payments received un-
der the Act subject to federal income tax?
A–1. Yes, Owner Payments are sub-
ject to federal income tax. If the amounts
received by the Owner are more than the
Owner’s adjusted basis in the quota, the
Owner has a taxable gain; if the Owner re-
ceives less than the Owner’s adjusted ba-
sis, the Owner has a loss that may be de-
ductible for tax purposes if the require-
ments for deduction under § 165 of the
Internal Revenue Code are satisfied. In
determining an Owner’s gain or loss, the
amount received for the quota does not in-
clude any amount treated as interest for
federal tax purposes. See Q&A–7 for help
in determining whether any portion of an
Owner Payment is treated as interest for
federal tax purposes.
Q–2. How does an Owner determine
the adjusted basis of a quota?
A–2. The adjusted basis of a quota
is determined differently depending upon
how the Owner acquired the quota.
•An Owner who holds a quota that is
derived from an original grant by the
federal government has a basis of zero
in the quota.
•The basis of a purchased quota is the
price the Owner paid for it.
•Generally an Owner who received a
quota as a gift has the same basis in
the quota as the person who gave the
quota to the Owner. Under certain cir-
cumstances, the basis is increased by
an amount related to the amount of gift
tax paid. If the basis is greater than
the fair market value of the quota at the
time of the gift, the basis for determin-
ing loss is that fair market value.
•ThebasisofaquotathatanOwner
inherited generally is the fair market
value of the quota at the time of the
decedent’s death.
The basis of a tobacco quota is not sub-
ject to adjustment through amortization,
depletion, or depreciation. However, if
an Owner improperly has deducted any
amount for these purposes, the Owner
must reduce the basis by the amount de-
ducted before determining the Owner’s
gain or loss. A similar reduction in the ba-
sis of a quota must be made for any amount
previously deducted as a loss because of
a reduction in the number of pounds of
tobacco allowable under the quota. If an
Owner purchased a quota and deducted
the entire cost in the year of purchase, then
the Owner’s basis in the quota is zero.
Q–3. If an Owner has a gain and re-
ports Owner Payments under the install-
ment method, when must the gain be in-
cluded in income?
A–3. The installment method may be
used to report gain if an Owner receives
at least one Owner Payment after the close
of the Owner’s taxable year that includes
theeffectivedateapplicable to the Owner.
The amount of the gain is the excess of
the total amount of Owner Payments to be
received, reduced by any amount treated
as interest, over the Owner’s adjusted ba-
sis in the quota. Under the installment
method, a proportionate amount of the gain
is taken into account in each year in which
an Owner Payment is received. See the in-
structions for Form 6252,Installment Sale
Income.
Q–4. If an Owner has a gain and elects
not to report Owner Payments under the
installment method, when must the gain be
included in income?
A–4. The Owner must report the entire
gain on the Owner’s federal income tax
return for the taxable year that includes the
effective date applicable to the Owner.
Q–5. Is the gain or loss with respect to
a quota ordinary or capital gain or loss?
A–5. Whether the gain or loss with
respect to a quota is ordinary or capital
depends on how the Owner used the quota.
•If an Owner used a quota in the trade
or business of farming and, on the ef-
fective date applicable to the Owner,
the Owner’s holding period for the
quota was more than one year, then the
transaction is reported under § 1231
on Form 4797,Sales of Business Prop-
erty. If an Owner has no other § 1231
transactions reportable on Form 4797,
any gain is treated as long-term capital
gain and any loss is treated as ordi-
nary loss. Even if an Owner has other
reportable § 1231 transactions, the
net result of all § 1231 transactions
reported generally is either long-term
capital gain or ordinary loss. See the
instructions for Form 4797 for more
detailed information.
•If an Owner held a quota for invest-
ment purposes, or for the production
of income, but did not use the quota in
July 11, 2005742005–28 I.R.B.

a trade or business, any gain or loss is
capital gain or loss.
Under certain circumstances, some or
all of the gain must be recharacterized and
reported as ordinary income. If an Owner
previously deducted (1) the cost of acquir-
ing a quota, (2) amounts for amortization,
depletion, or depreciation, or (3) amounts
to reflect a reduction in the quota pounds,
any gain is taxed as ordinary income up
to the amount previously deducted. The
Owner must report this amount of ordinary
income on the Owner’s return for the tax-
able year that includes the effective date
applicable to the Owner, even if the Owner
uses the installment method to report the
remainder of the gain.
Q–6. Are Owner Payments received
under the Act subject to Self-Employ-
ment Contributions Act (SECA) tax (see
§ 1402)?
A–6. No.
Q–7. Is any portion of an Owner Pay-
ment treated as interest for federal tax pur-
poses?
A–7. (a) If the total amount to be paid
under a contract does not exceed $3,000,
no portion of an Owner Payment is treated
as interest for federal tax purposes.
(b) If § 483 applies to a contract, a por-
tion of each Owner Payment (other than an
Owner Payment due within six months of
the effective date applicable to the Owner)
is treated as interest for federal tax pur-
poses. For example, § 483 generally ap-
plies to a contract if the total amount to
be paid under the contract does not exceed
$250,000 or if a cash method election is
made under §§ 1274A and 1.1274A–1(c).
A contract is eligible for the cash method
election only if the total amount to be paid
under the contract does not exceed the in-
flation-adjusted amount for a cash method
debt instrument ($3,202,100 for 2005).
(c) In all situations not described in (a)
or (b) above, a portion of each Owner Pay-
ment is treated as interest for federal tax
purposes under § 1274.
(d) In general, to determine the amount
of an Owner Payment that is treated as
interest, see § 483 or § 1274, whichever is
applicable, and the regulations thereunder.
You may wish to consult a tax advisor for
assistance in determining the portion of an
Owner Payment that is treated as interest
and the taxable year in which the interest
is includible in income.
Q–8. Does an individual Owner’s gain
or loss from Owner Payments qualify for
farm income averaging?
A–8. No. A tobaccoquota is consid-
ered an interest in land, and farm income
averaging is not available for gain or loss
arising from the sale or other disposition of
land.
Q–9. Are Owner Payments subject to
information reporting?
A–9. Yes. Because a tobacco quota
is considered an interest in land, the to-
tal amount received under a contract by
an owner in a taxable year generally will
be reported by USDA on Form 1099–S,
Proceeds From Real Estate Transactions,
if the amount is $600 or more. In addi-
tion, any portion of an Owner Payment
treated as interest for federal tax purposes
generallywillbereportedbyUSDAon
Form 1099–INT,Interest Income,iftheto-
tal amount of interest received in a taxable
year is $600 or more.
Q–10. Is the termination of a tobacco
quota under the Act an involuntary conver-
sion of the quota?
A–10. No.
Q–11. May an Owner enter into a like-
kind exchange of a quota?
A–11.Yes.AnOwnermaypostpone
reporting the gain or loss from the termina-
tion of a quota by entering into a like-kind
exchange if the Owner complies with the
requirements of § 1031 and the regulations
thereunder. For purposes of § 1031, the
date on which an Owner is deemed to re-
linquish a quota is the effective date appli-
cable to the Owner.
SUBSEQUENT GUIDANCE
Section 623 of the Act provides that
USDA will offer to enter into a con-
tract with an eligible tobacco producer
(Grower) under which the Grower may re-
ceive total payments of up to $3 per pound
of quota in 10 equal annual payments in
fiscal years 2005 through 2014 (Grower
Payments) in exchange for the termina-
tion of the tobacco marketing quotas and
related price support. Grower Payments
are determined by reference to the amount
of quota under which the Grower pro-
duced (or planted) tobacco during the
2002, 2003, and 2004 tobacco market-
ing years and are prorated based on the
number of years that the Grower produced
(or planted) quota tobacco during those
years. The federal tax treatment of Grower
Payments is expected to be addressed in
subsequent guidance.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is
Marnette M. Myers of the Office of As-
sociate Chief Counsel (Income Tax &
Accounting). For further information re-
garding Q&A–7 of this notice, contact
Pamela Lew of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
and Products) at (202) 622–3950 (not
a toll-free call). For further information
regarding the remainder of this notice,
contact Ms. Myers at (202) 622–4920 (not
a toll-free call).
Address Change for Arbitrage
Rebate Payments
Notice 2005–52
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This notice announces that the Income
Tax Regulations under § 148 of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code will be amended to pro-
vide that, in the case of bonds subject to
(a) § 1.148–1T which was initially pub-
lished on May 12, 1989, as part of T.D.
8252, 1989–1 C.B. 25 (and which expired
in May of 1992), or (b) § 1.148–1 which
was published on May 18, 1992, as part of
T.D. 8418, 1992–1 C.B. 29 (and which ex-
pired on June 30, 1993), rebate payments
must be filed at the same place or places
designated by the Commissioner for bonds
subject to § 1.148–3.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01 Section 103(a) generally provides
that gross income does not include inter-
est on any State or local bond. Under
§ 103(b)(2), however, interest on an arbi-
trage bond (within the meaning of §148) is
includable in gross income.
.02 Section 148(f)(1) generally pro-
vides that a bond that is part of an issue
shall be treated as an arbitrage bond unless
the issuer pays to the United States the
amounts described in § 148(f)(2) for the
issue (rebate amounts) in accordance with
§ 148(f)(3).
2005–28 I.R.B.75July 11, 2005

.03 Section 148(f)(3) provides that, ex-
cept to the extent provided by the Secre-
tary, rebate amounts must be paid in in-
stallments that are made at least once ev-
ery five years. The last installment must
be made no later than 60 days after the day
on which the last bond of the issue is re-
deemed.
.04 Section 1.148–3(g) provides that a
rebate payment is paid when it is filed with
the Internal Revenue Service at the place
or places designated bythe Commissioner.
See§ 7502(a) for the treatment of certain
payments made by U.S. mail.
.05 Section 1.148–1T, which was ini-
tially published on May 12, 1989, as part
of T.D. 8252 and which expired in May of
1992 (the1989 regulations), provides rules
for complying with the rebate requirement
with respect to certain bonds issued be-
fore the expiration of the 1989 regulations.
Section 1.148–1T(b)(3)(v) of the 1989 reg-
ulations provides that a rebate or correc-
tion amount is paid when filed with the In-
ternal Revenue Service Center, Philadel-
phia, Pennsylvania 19255.
.06 Section 1.148–1, which was pub-
lished on May 18, 1992, as part of T.D.
8418 and which expired on June 30, 1993
(the1992 regulations), provides rules for
complying with the rebate requirement
with respect to certain bonds issued before
July 1, 1993. Section 1.148–1(b)(3)(v) of
the 1992 regulations provides that a rebate
or correction amount is paid when filed
with the Internal Revenue Service Center,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19255.
SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO
REGULATIONS
The regulations will be amended to pro-
vide that, in the case of bonds subject to
the 1989 regulations (as defined in section
2.05) or the 1992 regulations (as defined
in section 2.06), rebate payments must be
filed at the same place or places designated
by the Commissioner for bonds subject to
§ 1.148–3. Until further notice, rebate pay-
ments for bonds subject to the 1989 regu-
lations or the 1992 regulations should be
sent to the following address:
Internal Revenue Service
Ogden Submission Processing Center
Ogden, Utah 84201
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is
David White of the Office of Division
Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax
Exempt and Government Entities). For
further information regarding this revenue
procedure, contact Mr. White at (202)
622–3980 (not a toll-free call).
26 CFR 601.204: Changes in accounting periods and
in methods of accounting.
(Also Part I, §§ 61, 446, 451.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–35
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure sets forth a safe
harbor method of accounting for a Util-
ity’s treatment of an Up-front Payment
that the Utility receives from a Generator
to finance Network Upgrades to the Util-
ity’s Transmission System. This revenue
procedure also provides a procedure for a
Utility to obtain automatic consent of the
Commissioner to changetothesafeharbor
method of accounting. Finally, this rev-
enue procedure provides audit protection
to a Utility that has used the safe harbor
method of accounting, provided that cer-
tain conditions are satisfied.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01 A Utility is required pursuant to
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) rules and policy to accommodate
any request from a Generator to intercon-
nect the Generator tothe Utility’s Trans-
mission System. In general, for a Gen-
erator to begin providing electricity from
its facility to its customers over a Util-
ity’s Transmission System, certain Net-
work Upgrades must be made to the Trans-
mission System to accommodate the ad-
dition of the facility’s electricity. Under
FERC policy, costs of the Network Up-
grades generally must be paid in advance
to the Utility in the form of an Up-front
Payment by the interconnecting Generator.
To comply with FERC policy, the Inter-
connection Agreement between the Utility
and the Generator typically requires that
the Generator’s Up-front Payment to the
Utility be reimbursed by the Utility.
.02 The FERC standard Interconnec-
tion Agreement, FERC Order No. 2003–B
issued December 20, 2004 (70 FR 265),
requires that the Utility reimburse the
Generator’s Up-front Payment in cash,
plus make additional payments to the
Generator that are designated as interest
by FERC Order No. 2003–B (“FERC
Interest”). Prior FERC approved Intercon-
nection Agreements permit the Utility to
make reimbursements in cash, in assign-
able transmission credits that may be used
to offset the cost of transmission services,
or in a combination of cash and assignable
transmission credits.
.03 The IRS has received numerous in-
quiries about how Utilities should treat
Up-front Payments for federal income tax
purposes.
.04 Section 1.446–1(e)(3)(ii) of the In-
come Tax Regulations authorizes the Com-
missioner to prescribe administrative pro-
cedures setting forth the limitations, terms,
and conditions deemed necessary to permit
a taxpayer to obtain consent to change a
method of accounting.
.05 Rev. Proc. 2002–9, 2002–1 C.B.
327 (as modified and clarified by An-
nouncement 2002–17, 2002–1 C.B. 561,
modified and amplified by Rev. Proc.
2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696, and ampli-
fied, clarified, and modified by Rev. Proc.
2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432) provides pro-
cedures by which a taxpayer may obtain
automatic consent to change to a method
of accounting described in the Appendix
of Rev. Proc. 2002–9.
.06 Section 2.04 of Rev. Proc. 2002–9
provides that unlessspecifically autho-
rized by the Commissioner, a taxpayer
may not request, or otherwise make, a
retroactive change in method of account-
ing, regardless of whether the change is
fromapermissibleor an impermissible
method. See generally Rev. Rul. 90–38,
1990–1 C.B. 57.
SECTION 3. SCOPE
This revenue procedure applies to a
Utility that receives an Up-front Payment
from a Generator to finance Network
Upgrades to the Utility’s Transmission
System.
SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS
The following definitions apply for pur-
poses of this revenue procedure:
July 11, 2005762005–28 I.R.B.

.01Commercial Operation Datemeans
the date on which the Generator com-
mences commercial operation of its facil-
ity after trial operation of such facility has
been completed and confirmed in writing
as prescribed by FERC.
.02Generatormeans the owner or op-
erator of an electric generation facility.
.03Interconnection Agreementmeans
the agreement entered into between a Util-
ity and a Generator for the purpose of inter-
connecting the Generator with the Utility’s
Transmission System.
.04Network Upgradesmean the addi-
tions, modifications, and upgrades to the
Transmission System required at or be-
yond the point at which the Generator in-
terconnects to the Transmission System to
accommodate the interconnection of the
Generator to the Transmission System.
.05Transmission Systemmeans the fa-
cilities owned, controlled, or operated by
a Utility that are used to provide electric
transmission service,including any addi-
tions, modifications, or upgrades made to
such facilities.
.06Up-front Paymentmeans the
amount or amounts paid by a Generator
to a Utility pursuant to their Interconnec-
tion Agreement for costs with respect to
Network Upgrades to the Utility’s Trans-
mission System.
.07Utilitymeans an electrical transmis-
sion or distribution system owner or oper-
ator that is subject to the regulatory author-
ity of FERC as well as a State public util-
ity commission or other appropriate State
agency.
SECTION 5. APPLICATION
.01 For federal income tax purposes,
if an Up-front Payment is made pursuant
to an Interconnection Agreement that sat-
isfies all of the conditions of either sec-
tion 5.02 or 5.03 of this revenue procedure,
whichever is applicable, a Utility may treat
that Up-front Payment as not being tax-
able income under § 61 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code when received (the “safe har-
bor method”). In addition, a Utility that
uses the safe harbor method is not entitled
to any deduction for its reimbursements
of the Up-front Payment. To the extent
that FERC Interest is deductible, it must be
properly allocated to the periods in which
it accrues.
.02 For Interconnection Agreements
entered into on or after December 20,
2004:
(1) The Interconnection Agreement
must entitle the Generator to receive re-
imbursement of an amount that is not less
than the amount of the Up-front Payment;
(2) The Interconnection Agreement
must require reimbursement of the
Up-front Payment to be made in cash;
(3) The Interconnection Agreement
must require that the Utility pay the Gen-
erator FERC Interest calculated in accor-
dance with FERC Order No. 2003–B; and
(4) The Interconnection Agreement
must require full reimbursement of the
Up-front Payment, plus the FERC Interest
calculated in accordance with FERC Order
No. 2003–B, to be paid to the Generator
no later than twenty (20) years after the
Commercial Operation Date.
.03 For Interconnection Agreements
entered into before December 20, 2004:
(1) Pursuant to the Interconnection
Agreement, the Generator either has re-
ceived, or must be entitled to receive,
reimbursement of an amount that is not
less than the amount of the Up-front Pay-
ment;
(2) The Interconnection Agreement
must require reimbursement of the
Up-front Payment to be made either in
cash, assignable transmission credits, or a
combination of both; and
(3) On July 11, 2005, the Utility must
reasonably expect that under the terms of
the Interconnection Agreement, full reim-
bursement of the Up-front Payment will be
made no later than twenty (20) years after
the Commercial Operation Date.
SECTION 6. CHANGE IN METHOD
OF ACCOUNTING
.01In general. A change in a Utility’s
treatment of an Up-Front Payment, includ-
ing a change to the safe harbor method pro-
vided in section 5.01 of this revenue pro-
cedure, is a change in method of account-
ing to which the provisions of §§ 446 and
481 and the regulations thereunder apply.
For Up-front Payments received pursuant
to Interconnection Agreements that satisfy
the conditions of section 5.02 or 5.03 of
this revenue procedure, whichever is appli-
cable, a Utility must follow section 6.02 or
6.03 of this revenue procedure to change
its treatment of the Up-front Payments to
the safe harbor method provided in section
5.01 of this revenue procedure.
.02Automatic change. A Utility within
the scope of this revenue procedure that
desires to change its treatment of Up-front
Payments to the safe harbor method pro-
vided in section 5.01 of this revenue pro-
cedure for any taxable year ending on or
after July 11, 2005, must follow the auto-
matic change in accounting method provi-
sions of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 (or its succes-
sor), with the following modifications:
(1) The scope limitations in section 4.02
of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 do not apply for the
first taxable year ending on or after July 11,
2005; and
(2) The Utility must prepare and file a
Form 3115 in accordance with section 6 of
Rev. Proc. 2002–9 and must enter the des-
ignated number for the automatic change
in method in Line 1a of Form 3115. The
designated number for the automatic ac-
counting method change to the safe har-
bormethodprovidedinsection5.01ofthis
revenue procedure is “91”.
.03Change for prior taxable years.A
Utility within the scope of this revenue
procedure that desires to change its treat-
ment of Up-front Payments to the safe har-
bormethodprovidedinsection5.01of
this revenue procedure for any open tax-
able year in a series of consecutive open
taxable years ending with the taxable year
immediately prior to Utility’s first taxable
year ending on or after July 11, 2005, must
follow the automatic change in accounting
method provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002–9
(or its successor), with the following mod-
ifications:
(1) The scope limitations in section 4.02
of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 do not apply;
(2) The Utility must prepare a Form
3115 in accordance with section 6 of Rev.
Proc. 2002–9 and must enter the desig-
nated number for the automatic change in
method in Line 1a of Form 3115 (the desig-
nated number for the automatic accounting
method change to the safe harbor method
provided in section 5.01 of this revenue
procedure is “91”); and
(3) The timely duplicate filing require-
ments of section 6.02(3) of Rev. Proc.
2002–9 do not apply; in lieu of such re-
quirements, the Utility must:
(a) attach a completed Form 3115 to an
amended return for the year of change, and
must file, on or before December 31, 2005,
that amended return and amended returns
2005–28 I.R.B.77July 11, 2005

for all subsequent affected taxable years, if
any; and
(b) file a copy of the Form 3115 with
the IRS National Office no later than when
theoriginalForm3115isfiledwiththe
amended return.
In accordance with § 1.446–1(e)(3)(ii)
and Rev. Rul. 90–38, a Utility complying
with the provisions of this section 6.03 is
hereby granted consent to make a retroac-
tive change in method of accounting to
the safe harbor method provided in section
5.01 of this revenue procedure.
SECTION 7. AUDIT PROTECTION
.01 If a Utility uses the safe harbor
method provided in section 5.01 of this
revenue procedure for Up-front Payments
and does not deduct its reimbursements of
the Up-front Payments, the method of ac-
counting for an Up-front Payment will not
be raised as an issue by the IRS in a taxable
year that ends on or before July 11, 2005,
provided the Up-front Payment was made
pursuant to an Interconnection Agreement
that satisfies all of the conditions of either
section 5.02 or 5.03 of this revenue pro-
cedure, whichever is applicable. Also, if
a Utility uses the safe harbor method pro-
vided in section 5.01 of this revenue pro-
cedure for Up-front Payments and does not
deduct its reimbursements of the Up-front
Payments, and its use of that method is
an issue under consideration (within the
meaning of section 3.09 of Rev. Proc.
2002–9) in examination, before an appeals
office, or before the U.S. Tax Court for any
taxable year that ends on or before July 11,
2005, that issue will not be further pursued
by the IRS, provided that the conditions
in either section 5.02 or 5.03 of this rev-
enue procedure, whichever is applicable,
are satisfied.
SECTION 8. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 2002–9 is modified and
amplified to include this automatic change
in the APPENDIX.
SECTION 9. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is David B. Silber of the Office
of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial
Institutions and Products). For further
information regarding this revenue proce-
dure, contact Mr. Silber at (202) 622–3930
(not a toll-free call).
26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims
for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of
correct tax liability.
(Also Part I, § 42; 1.42–14.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–36
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure publishes the
amounts of unused housing credit carry-
overs allocated to qualified states under
§ 42(h)(3)(D) of the Internal Revenue
Code for calendar year 2005.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
Rev. Proc. 92–31, 1992–1 C.B. 775,
provides guidance tostate housing credit
agencies of qualified states on the pro-
cedure for requesting an allocation of
unused housing credit carryovers under
§ 42(h)(3)(D). Section 4.06 of Rev. Proc.
92–31 provides that the Internal Rev-
enue Service will publish in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin the amount of unused
housing credit carryovers allocated to
qualified states for a calendar year from
a national pool of unused credit authority
(the National Pool). This revenue proce-
dure publishes these amounts for calendar
year 2005.
SECTION 3. PROCEDURE
The unused housing credit carryover
amount allocated from the National Pool
by the Secretary to each qualified state for
calendar year 2005 is as follows:
Qualified StateAmount Allocated
Alabama
$107,035
Alaska15,486
California848,068
Connect
icut
82,780
Delaware19,619
Florida411,045
Georgia208,613
Idaho32,919
Illinois300,387
India
na
147,3
76
Kansas64,632
Kentucky97,956
Maine31,123
Maryland131,321
Massachusetts151,604
Mic
higan
238
,932
Minnesota120,521
July 11, 2005782005–28 I.R.B.

Qualified StateAmount Allocated
Mississippi68,589
Missouri135,965
Nebraska41,282
New Hampshire30,703
New Jersey205,530
New Mexico44,969
New York454,281
North Carolina201,805
Ohio270,744
Oregon84,930
Pennsylvania293,125
Rhode Island25,532
Tennessee139,423
Texas531,375
Utah56,446
Virgin
ia
176,25
4
Washington146,578
West Virginia42,892
Wisconsin130,162
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective
for allocations of housing credit dollar
amounts attributable to the National Pool
component of a qualified state’s housing
credit ceiling for calendar year 2005.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Christopher J. Wilson of
the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries). For
further information regarding this revenue
procedure, contact Mr. Wilson at (202)
622–3040 (not a toll-free call).
26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims
for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of
correct tax liability.
(Also Part I, § 42; 1.42–5.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–37
SE
CTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure establishes a
safe harbor under which housing credit
agencies and project owners may meet
the requirements of § 42(h)(6)(B)(i) of
the Internal Revenue Code as described in
Q&A–5 of Rev. Rul. 2004–82, 2004–35
I.R.B. 350, concerning extended low-in-
come housing commitments (commit-
ments).
SECTI
ON 2. BACKGROUND
Section 42(a) provides for a credit for
investment in qualified low-income build-
ings (as defined in § 42(c)(2)). Under
§ 42(i)(3)(A), low-income units in a build-
ing must be occupied by individuals who
meet the income limitation applicable un-
der § 42(g)(1) to the project of which the
building is a part. The building owner
must elect under § 42(g)(1) to rent a per-
centage of the residential units to individ-
uals whose income is 50 percent or less of
area median gross income or 60 percent or
less of area median gross income.
Section 42(h)(6)(A) provides that no
credit will be allowed with respect to any
building for the taxable year unless a com-
mitment (as defined in § 42(h)(6)(B)) is in
effect as of the end of the taxable year.
Section 42(h)(6)(B)(i) requires com-
mitments to include the prohibitions
against the actions described in subclauses
(I) and (II) of § 42(h)(6)(E)(ii) during the
extended use period, that is, prohibitions
against eviction or termination of tenancy
of an existing tenant of any low-income
unit (other than for good cause) and any
increase in the gross rent with respect to a
low-income unit not otherwise permitted
by § 42, applicable throughout the entire
commitment period.
Section 42(h)(6)(B)(ii) provides that a
commitment must allow individuals who
meet the income limitation applicable
to the building under § 42(g) (whether
prospective, present, or former occu-
pants of the building) the right to enforce
in any state court the prohibitions of
§ 42(h)(6)(B)(i).
Section 42(h)(6)(J) provides that if,
during a taxable year, there is a determina-
tion that a commitment was not in effect
as of the beginning of the taxable year, the
determination shall not apply to any period
before the year and subparagraph (A) shall
be applied without regard to the determi-
nation if the failure is corrected within 1
year from the date of determination.
Section 1.42–5(c)(1)(xi) of the Income
Tax Regulations provides that a housing
credit agency must require the owner of a
low-income housingproject to certify at
least annually to the housing credit agency
that, for the preceding 12-month period,
a commitment as described in § 42(h)(6)
was in effect (for buildings subject to
§ 7108(c)(1) of the Omnibus Budget Rec-
onciliation Act of 1989, 1990–1 C.B.
210), including the requirement under
§ 42(h)(6)(B)(iv) that an owner cannot
refuse to lease a unit in the project to an
applicant because the applicant holds a
voucher or certificate of eligibility under
2005–28 I.R.B.79July 11, 2005

section 8 of the United States Housing
Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437f (for build-
ings subject to § 13142(b)(4) of the Om-
nibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993,
1993–3 C.B. 1).
On August 30, 2004, the Service ruled
in Q&A–5 of Rev. Rul. 2004–82 that
§ 42(h)(6)(B)(i) requires commitments to
include the prohibitions against the ac-
tions described in subclauses (I) and (II)
of § 42(h)(6)(E)(ii) during the extended
use period, that is, prohibitions against
eviction or termination of tenancy of an
existing tenant of any low-income unit
(other than for good cause) and any in-
crease in the gross rent with respect to
a low-income unit not otherwise permit-
ted by § 42, applicable throughout the
entire commitment period. This require-
ment for commitments extends back to
theeffectivedateof§42(h)(6)(B)(i). See
§ 11701(a)(7)(A) of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990, 1991–2 C.B.
481, 531.
Q&A–5 provided that if it is deter-
mined by the end of a taxable year that
a taxpayer’s commitment does not meet
the requirements for a commitment under
§ 42(h)(6)(B) (for example, it does not
provide no-cause eviction protection for
the tenants of low-income units through-
out the extended use period), the low
income housing credit is not allowable
with respect to the building for the taxable
year, or any prior taxable year. However,
if the failure to have a valid commitment
in effect is corrected within 1 year from
the date of the determination, the determi-
nation will not apply to the current year of
the credit period or any prior year.
Q&A–5 required each Agency to re-
view its existing commitments by Decem-
ber 31, 2004, to ensure that the no-cause
eviction protection and the prohibition
against improper increases in gross rent
apply throughout the extended use period.
If during that review, an Agency deter-
mined that a commitment did not comply
with these requirements, the 1-year period
described under § 42(h)(6)(J) will com-
mence on the date of that determination.
SECTION 3. SAFE HARBOR
.01 The Service has determined that
Agencies may satisfy the review require-
ments under Q&A–5 for commitments en-
tered into before January 1, 2006, under
§ 42(h)(6)(B)(i) in the following manner:
(1) Commitments entered into before
January 1, 2006, that contain general lan-
guage requiring building owners to com-
ply with the requirements of § 42 (catch-all
language) satisfy therequirements under
Q&A–5, if:
(a) Agencies notify building owners in
writing on or before December 31, 2005,
that consistent with the interpretation in
Q&A–5, the catch-all language prohibits
the owner from evicting or terminating
the tenancy of an existing tenant of any
low-income unit (other than for good
cause) throughout the entire commitment
period. Further, Agencies must notify
building owners that the catch-all lan-
guage prohibits the owner from making an
increase in the gross rent with respect to a
low-income unit not otherwise permitted
by § 42 throughout the entire commitment
period;
(b) The owner must, as part of its cer-
tification under § 1.42–5(c)(1)(xi), certify
annually that for the preceding 12-month
period no tenants in low-income units were
evicted or had their tenancies terminated
other than for good cause and that no ten-
ants had an increase in the gross rent with
respect to a low-income unit not otherwise
permitted under § 42;
(c) If the owner fails to make the certi-
fications in (b) above or the Agency learns
that the owner has evicted tenants in low-
income units or terminated their tenancies
other than for good cause or has increased
the gross rent of a tenant with respect to
a low-income unit not otherwise permit-
ted under § 42, the Agency shall report
the owner to the Internal Revenue Service
using Form 8823,Low-Income Housing
Credit Agencies Report of Noncompliance
or Building Disposition;and
(d) Section 3.02 shall also apply to any
amendment to any commitment containing
catch-all language if the amendment is ex-
ecuted after December 31, 2005.
(2) Commitments entered into before
January 1, 2006, that do not contain spe-
cific language on the § 42(h)(6)(B)(i) pro-
hibition against the actions described in
subclauses (I) and (II) of § 42(h)(6)(E)(ii)
or catch-all language do not satisfy
the requirements of Q&A–5 and must
be amended to clearly provide for the
§ 42(h)(6)(B)(i) prohibition against the
actions described in subclauses (I) and
(II) of § 42(h)(6)(E)(ii) by December 31,
2005.
.02 The Service has determined that
Agencies may satisfy the review require-
ments under Q&A–5 for commitments ex-
ecuted after December 31, 2005, under
§ 42(h)(6)(B)(i) in the following manner:
(1) Commitments executed after De-
cember 31, 2005, must clearly provide for
the § 42(h)(6)(B)(i) prohibition against the
actions described in subclauses (I) and (II)
of § 42(h)(6)(E)(ii);
(2) The owner must, as part of its certi-
fications under § 1.42–5(c)(1)(xi), certify
annually that for the preceding 12-month
period no tenants in low-income units were
evicted or had their tenancies terminated
other than for good cause and that no ten-
ants had an increase in the gross rent with
respect to a low-income unit not otherwise
permitted under § 42; and
(3) If the owner fails to make the certi-
fications in (2) above or the Agency learns
that the owner has evicted tenants in low-
income units or terminated their tenancies
other than for good cause or has increased
the gross rent of a tenant with respect to
a low-income unit not otherwise permit-
ted under § 42, the Agency shall report
the owner to the Internal Revenue Service
using Form 8823,Low-Income Housing
Credit Agencies Report of Noncompliance
or Building Disposition.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective on
June 21, 2005, the date this revenue proce-
dure was released to the tax services.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Jack Malgeri of the Of-
fice of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries).
For further information regarding this rev-
enue procedure, contact Mr. Malgeri at
(202) 622–3040 (not a toll-free call).
July 11, 2005802005–28 I.R.B.

26 CFR § 301.6404–2: Abatement of interest.
(Also: § 6404(e), (g), and (h);
26 CFR § 301.6404–1.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–38
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This revenue procedure describes how
taxpayers may seek administrative relief
if the Internal Revenue Service (the Ser-
vice) has assessed interest for periods dur-
ing which interest should have been sus-
pended under section 6404(g) of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code (the Code). Although
there is no prepayment right to administra-
tive relief under the Code with respect to
the abatement of interest assessed in viola-
tion of section 6404(g), this revenue proce-
dure provides a permissive procedure for
seeking such relief.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01 Section 6601 requires the payment
of interest on any amount of tax imposed
by title 26 that is not paid on or before
the last date prescribed for payment of the
tax. Section 6151 provides that the date
for payment of tax is generally the date a
taxpayer must file a return reporting the
tax (determined without regard to any ex-
tension of time for filing the return). Sec-
tion 6601(e) provides that interest shall be
assessed, collected, and paid in the same
manner as tax, and that any reference to tax
in title 26 (except subchapter B of chapter
63, relating to deficiency procedures) shall
be deemed also to refer to interest imposed
under section 6601.
.02 Section 6404(a) authorizes the Sec-
retary to abate an assessment of tax or any
liability in respect thereof (including in-
terest) if the assessment is excessive in
amount, untimely, or erroneously or ille-
gally assessed. Notwithstanding the au-
thority provided by section 6404(a), sec-
tion 6404(b) precludes taxpayers from fil-
ing administrative claims for abatement
with respect to income, estate, or gift taxes.
For other types of tax, taxpayers may file
an administrative claim requesting that the
Service abate an improper assessment as
provided in section 301.6404–1(c) of the
Regulations on Procedure and Administra-
tion.
.03 Section 6404(e) authorizes the Sec-
retary to abate an assessment of interest
where the interest is attributable in whole
or in part to any unreasonable error or
delay by an officer or employee of the
Service in performing a ministerial or
managerial act. Section 6404(e) provides
a limited exception to the general prohi-
bition against claims for abatement with
respect to income, estate, or gift taxes
that is set forth in section 6404(b).See
Urbana v. Commissioner, 122 T.C. 384,
389–90 & n.4 (2004);see alsoTreas. Reg.
§ 301.6404–2 (describing interest abate-
ment rules under section 6404(e)).
.04 Except as provided in section
6404(g)(2), in the case of an individual
who files an income tax return, section
6404(g)(1) suspends the accrual of in-
terest and time-sensitive penalties if the
Secretary does not provide notice to the
taxpayer specificallystating the amount
due and the basis for the liability within
18 months of the later of the due date of
the return (without regard to extensions)
or the date the return was filed.
Section 6404(g) was enacted as part
of the Internal Revenue Service Restruc-
turing and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L.
No. 105–206, 112 Stat. 685, and relates
to interest suspension, rather than inter-
est abatement. Nothing in the statute or
its legislative history suggests that Con-
gress intended section 6404(g) to create
an exception to the general rule of sec-
tion 6404(b) that prohibits taxpayers from
filing claims for abatement with respect
to income tax.SeeH.R. Conf. Rep. No.
599, 105
th
Cong. 2d Sess. 259–60 (1998).
Compare id. withH.R. Rep. No. 506,
104
th
Cong. 2d Sess. 27–28 (1996) (dis-
cussing amendments to section 6404(e)
and an expansion of the circumstances in
which interest can be abated and abate-
ment determinations can be reviewed).
Accordingly, claims for abatement of in-
terest assessed for periods during which
interest should have been suspended un-
der section 6404(g) are barred by section
6404(b).
.05 Section 6404(h) provides the
United States Tax Court with jurisdic-
tion over any action brought by a taxpayer
who meets the requirements of section
7430(c)(4)(A)(ii) to determine whether
the Secretary’s failure to abate interest
was an abuse of discretion, and to order
an abatement. The action must be brought
within 180 days after the date of mailing
of the Secretary’s final determination not
to abate interest.
The judicial review provisions of sec-
tion 6404(h) apply where the Service has
abused its discretion by failing to abate in-
terest as provided by section 6404. These
provisions do not apply where the Service
has failed to suspend interest under section
6404(g), except as provided in paragraph
3.03 below.
SECTION 3. ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW PROCEDURE
.01 Subject to the exception in para-
graph 3.03 below, taxpayers may not
submit claims for abatement of interest
assessed with respect to periods during
which interest should have been sus-
pended under section 6404(g). Pursuant to
this revenue procedure, however, taxpay-
ers may notify the Service that interest was
assessed in violation of section 6404(g) by
submitting Form 843,“Claim for Refund
and Request for Abatement.”Taxpayers
should write “Section 6404(g) Notifica-
tion” at the top of the Form 843. The
Service will review the Form 843 notifica-
tion, decide whether to abate interest under
section 6404(a), and notify the taxpayer
of its decision. Because section 6404(g)
is an interest suspension provision, rather
than an interest abatement provision, and
because section 6404(b) generally bars
claims for abatement with respect to in-
come tax, the notification to the taxpayer
of the Service’s abatement determination
does not constitute a final determination
letter from which the taxpayer can petition
the Tax Court under section 6404(h).
.02 If the Service does not exercise its
authority under section 6404(a) to abate
interest alleged to have been assessed in
violation of section 6404(g), the taxpayer
may pay the disputed interest assessment,
file an administrative claim for refund and,
if that claim is denied or not acted upon
within six months from the date of filing,
bring suit for refund under section 7422
and 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1).
.03 If a taxpayer asserts that the Service
failed to suspend interest under section
6404(g) as a result of an unreasonable
error or delay in performing a ministerial
or managerial act within the meaning of
section 6404(e), the taxpayer may sub-
mit a claim for abatement on Form 843.
The Service will consider the claim and
2005–28 I.R.B.81July 11, 2005

issue a notice of final determination. If
the Service denies the taxpayer’s claim
in whole or in part, taxpayers who meet
the requirements referred to in section
7430(c)(4)(A)(ii) may petition the Tax
Court under section 6404(h) to determine
whether the denial was an abuse of discre-
tion. Pursuant to section 6404(b), a claim
may not be submitted under this section
3.03 asserting only that interest was as-
sessed for periods during which interest
should have been suspended under section
6404(g).
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective July
11, 2005, the date this revenue procedure
was released in the Internal Revenue Bul-
letin.
SECTION 5. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Julie A. Jebe of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration), Administrative Provi-
sions and Judicial Practice Division. For
further information regarding this revenue
procedure, contact Branch 3 of Adminis-
trative Provisions and Judicial Practice at
(202) 622–7950 (not a toll-free call).
26 CFR 31.6061–1: Signing of returns.
(Also: 26 CFR 31.6011(a)–7.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–39
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure sets out the
circumstances under which facsimile sig-
natures may be used on (1) any form
within the Form 94X series (including,
but not limited to, Form 940,Employer’s
Annual Federal Unemployment (FUTA)
Tax Return; Form 941,Employer’s Quar-
terly Federal Tax Return; Form 943,Em-
ployer’s Annual Federal Tax Return for
Agricultural Employees; and Form 945,
Annual Return of Withheld Federal Income
Tax); (2) Form 1042,Annual Withholding
Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of For-
eign Persons; (3) Form 8027,Employer’s
Annual Information Return of Tip Income
and Allocated Tips;(4)FormCT–1,Em-
ployer’s Annual Railroad Retirement Tax
Return; or (5) any variant of these forms
(e.g., Form 941c,Supporting Statement to
Correct Information; Form 941–SS,Em-
ployer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return).
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
Section 6061(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code generally provides that any return,
statement, or other document required to
be made under any provision of the inter-
nal revenue laws or regulations shall be
signed in accordance with forms or regu-
lations prescribed by the Secretary.
Section 6061(b) authorizes the Secre-
tary to develop procedures for the accep-
tance of signatures in digital or other elec-
tronic form. Section 6061(b)(1)(B) pro-
vides that the Secretary may provide for al-
ternative methods of signing returns, dec-
larations, statements, or other documents.
Section 6061(b)(2) provides that, notwith-
standing any other provision of law, any re-
turn, declaration, statement, or other docu-
ment signed under an approved alternative
method will be treated for all purposes as
an original signature.
Section 31.6061–1 of the Regulations
on Employment Taxes and Collection of
Income Tax at Source provides that em-
ployment tax returns must be signed by:
(a) the individual, if the person required
to make the return is an individual;
(b) the president, vice president, or
other principal officer, if the person re-
quired to make the return is a corporation;
(c) a responsible and duly authorized
member or officer having knowledge of its
affairs, if the person required to make the
return is a partnership or other unincorpo-
rated organization; or
(d) the fiduciary, if the person required
to make the return is a trust or estate.
Returns may also be signed for the tax-
payer by a duly authorized agent in ac-
cordance with section 31.6011(a)–7 of the
regulations.
Section 31.6011(a)–7 provides that an
employment tax return may be made by an
agent in the name of the person required
to make the return if an acceptable power
of attorney is filed with the Service and if
the return includes all taxes required to be
reported by such person on such return for
the period covered by the return.
Section 301.6061–1(b) of the Regu-
lations on Procedure and Administration
provides that the Secretary may prescribe
in forms, instructions, or other appropri-
ate guidance, the method of signing any
return, statement, or other document re-
quired to be made under any provision of
the internal revenue laws or regulations.
SECTION 3. SCOPE AND
APPLICATION
Corporate officers or duly authorized
agents may sign any of the following forms
by facsimile (i.e., by rubber stamp, me-
chanical device, or computer software pro-
gram): (1) the Form 94X series; (2) Form
1042; (3) Form 8027; (4) Form CT–1; or
(5) any variant of such designated form
(e.g., Form 941c; Form 941–SS). Officers
or agents using a facsimile means of signa-
ture are personally responsible for ensur-
ing that their facsimile signature is affixed
to returns. The person filing the form must
retain a letter, signed by the officer or agent
authorized to sign the return, declaring un-
der penalties of perjury that the facsimile
signature appearing on the form is the sig-
nature adopted by the officer or agent and
that the facsimile signature was affixed to
the form by the officer or agent or at his
or her direction. The letter must list each
return by name and identifying number.
The letter should not be sent to the Inter-
nal Revenue Service unless specifically re-
quested by the Service. The letter shall be
maintained for at least four years after the
due date of such tax as the return relates,
or the date such tax is paid, whichever is
later.
SECTION 4. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
Rev. Rul. 82–29, 1982–1 C.B. 200,
is modified to add the forms designated
above to the list of forms for which fac-
simile signatures are accepted by the Ser-
vice. Rev. Rul. 82–29 is clarified as to
the definition of facsimile signature, and
is modified to delete the requirement that
each group of returns forwarded to the In-
ternal Revenue Service be accompanied by
a list of such returns and a letter, signed by
July 11, 2005822005–28 I.R.B.

the person authorized to sign the returns,
adopting the signature on the returns.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective for
any of the designated forms filed with the
Internal Revenue Service on or after July
1, 2005.
SECTION 6. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Richard Charles Grosenick
of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure & Administration). For further
information regarding this revenue proce-
dure, contact Richard Charles Grosenick
at (202) 622–7950 (not a toll-free call).
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters.
(Also Part I, §§ 148; 1.148–3.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–40
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure provides is-
suers of State or local bonds described in
§ 103(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and
subject to § 148(f)(3) and § 1.148–3(g)
of the Income Tax Regulations with pro-
cedures for correcting a failure to timely
pay the proper amount of arbitrage rebate
as required by the regulations. This rev-
enue procedure also modifies Rev. Proc.
90–11, 1990–1 C.B. 469, which provides
similar procedures for State or local bonds
subject to § 1.148–1T of the temporary In-
come Tax Regulations initially published
on May 12, 1989, as part of T.D. 8252,
1989–1 C.B. 25. The modification pro-
vides a new address for filing late rebate
payments and related requests.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01 Section 103(a) generally provides
that gross income does not include inter-
est on any State or local bond. Under
§ 103(b)(2), however, interest on an arbi-
trage bond (within the meaning of §148) is
includable in gross income.
.02 Section 148(f)(1) generally pro-
vides that a bond that is part of an issue
shall be treated as an arbitrage bond unless
the issuer pays to the United States the
amounts described in § 148(f)(2) for the
issue (rebate amounts) in accordance with
§ 148(f)(3).
.03 Section 148(f)(3) provides that, ex-
cept to the extent provided by the Secre-
tary, rebate amounts must be paid in in-
stallments that are made at least once ev-
ery five years. The last installment must
be made no later than 60 days after the day
on which the last bond of the issue is re-
deemed.
.04 Section 1.148–3(f) provides in part
that the first rebate installment payment
must be made for a computation date (as
determined under § 1.148–3(f)) that is not
later than five years after the issue date.
Subsequent rebate installment payments
must be made for a computation date
that is not later thanfive years after the
previous computation date for which an
installment payment was made.
.05 Section 1.148–3(g) provides that
each rebate payment must be paid no later
than 60 days after the computation date
to which the payment relates. Any rebate
payment paid within this 60-day period
may be treated as paid on the computa-
tion date to which it relates. A rebate
paymentispaidwhenitisfiledwiththe
Internal Revenue Service at the place or
places designated by the Commissioner.
See § 7502(a) for the treatment of certain
payments made by U.S. mail.
.06 Section 148(f)(7) provides that if
an issue would, but for § 148(f)(7), fail
to meet the requirements of § 148(f)(2) or
(3), the Secretary may treat the issue as
not failing to meet those requirements if:
(1) no bond of the issue is a private activ-
ity bond, as defined in § 141 (other than a
qualified 501(c)(3) bond within the mean-
ing of § 145); (2) the failure to meet those
requirements is not due to willful neglect;
and (3) the issuer pays to the United States
a penalty in an amount equal to the sum
of (i) 50 percent of the amount that was
not paid in accordance with § 148(f)(2) and
(3), plus (ii) interest (at the underpayment
rate established under section 6621) on the
portion of the amount that was not paid
on the date required under § 148(f)(3) for
the period beginning on that date. Section
148(f)(7) further provides that the Secre-
tary may waive all or any portion of the
penalty under § 148(f)(7).
.07 Section 1.148–3(h)(1) provides that
the failure to pay the correct rebate amount
when required will cause the bonds of an
issue to be arbitrage bonds unless the Com-
missioner determines that the failure was
not caused by willful neglect and the is-
suer promptly pays a penalty to the United
States. If no bond of the issue is a pri-
vate activity bond (other than a qualified
501(c)(3) bond), the penalty equals 50 per-
cent of the rebate amount not paid when
required to be paid, plus interest on the re-
bate amount not paid when required to be
paid. Otherwise, the penalty equals 100
percent of the rebate amount not paid when
required to be paid, plus interest on the re-
bate amount not paid when required to be
paid.
.08 Section 1.148–3(h)(2) provides that
interest accrues at the underpayment rate
under § 6621 beginning on the date the
correct rebate amount is due and ending on
the date ten days before it is paid.
.09 Section 1.148–3(h)(3) provides that
the penalty is automatically waived if the
rebate amount that the issuer failed to pay
is paid with interest within 180 days after
discovery of the failure, unless the Com-
missioner determines that the failure was
due to willful neglect, or the issue is un-
der examination by the Commissioner at
any time during the period beginning on
thedatethefailurefirst occurred and end-
ing on the date 90 days after the receipt of
the rebate amount. Generally, extensions
of this 180-day period and waivers of the
penalty in other cases will be granted by
the Commissioner only in unusual circum-
stances.
.10 Rev. Proc. 90–11 provides is-
suers of State or local bonds subject to
§ 1.148–1T, initially published on May 12,
1989, as part of T.D. 8252, with guidance
for filing (1) a request for an extension of
time to pay a correction amount of arbi-
trage rebate, (2) an explanation of an inno-
cent failure to meet a requirement for pay-
ment of arbitrage rebate, or (3) a request
for a ruling regarding a failure (other than
an innocent failure or one that is so treated)
to meet a requirement for payment of arbi-
trage rebate.
SECTION 3. PROCEDURES FOR
CORRECTING A FAILURE TO PAY
REBATE
.01In general.Afailuretopaythe
correct rebate amount when required by
§ 148(f)(3) and § 1.148–3(g) will not cause
the bonds of an issue to be arbitrage bonds
2005–28 I.R.B.83July 11, 2005

if the requirements of section 3.01(1) or
3.01(2) are met.
(1)Payment within 180-day period.
The requirements of this section 3.01(1)
are met if, within 180 days after the issuer
discovers the failure to pay the correct
rebate amount when required (the180-day
period), the rebate amount that the issuer
failed to pay, plus interest, is paid to the
United States in accordance with section
3.04, unless—
(a) The Commissioner determines that
the failure was due to willful neglect, or
(b) The issue is under examination by
the Service at any time during the period
beginning on the date the failure first oc-
curred and ending on the date 90 days after
the Service receives the rebate amount.
(2)Payment after 180-day period.The
requirements of this section 3.01(2) are
met if, after the expiration of the 180-day
period—
(a) The rebate amount that the issuer
failed to pay, plus interest, plus the penalty
determined under section 3.02, is paid to
the United States in accordance with sec-
tion 3.04, and
(b) The Commissioner determines that
the failure was not caused by willful ne-
glect.
.02Penalty.
(1)Governmental and qualified
501(c)(3) bonds. Ifnobondoftheis-
sue is a private activity bond (other than
a qualified 501(c)(3) bond), the penalty
equals 50 percent of the rebate amount not
paid when required to be paid.
(2)Private activity bonds (other than
qualified 501(c)(3) bonds).Iftheis-
sue consists of private activity bonds
(other than qualified 501(c)(3) bonds), the
penalty equals 100 percent of the rebate
amount not paid when required to be paid.
.03Extensions of 180-day period and
waivers of penalty. Anissuermayapply
for an extension of the 180-day period for
purposes of section 3.01(1), or a waiver of
the penalty for purposes of section 3.01(2),
in accordance with the procedures set forth
in section 5. Under § 1.148–3(h)(3), exten-
sions of the 180-day period and waivers of
the penalty generally will be granted only
in unusual circumstances.
.04Payment and explanation of why the
late payment was not due to willful ne-
glect. The amount described in section
3.01(1) or (2) must be mailed to the Inter-
nal Revenue Service, Ogden Submission
Processing Center, Ogden, Utah 84201, to-
gether with Form 8038–T (Arbitrage Re-
bate and Penalty in Lieu of Arbitrage Re-
bate) and a detailed explanation address-
ing why the failure to timely pay the cor-
rect rebate amount was not due to willful
neglect. The explanation must include the
followingdeclarationsignedbyanindi-
vidual who has personal knowledge of the
relevant facts and circumstances: “Under
penalties of perjury, I declare that I have
examined this explanation, including ac-
companying documents, and, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, the explana-
tion contains all the relevant facts relat-
ing to the explanation, and such facts are
true, correct, and complete.” The explana-
tion must include all relevant information,
including when the rebate amount was re-
quired to be paid, why the rebate amount
was not timely paid and a description of
the events that led up to both the failure
to timely pay and discovery of the failure.
The explanation should also discuss the
factors set forth in section 4.01 and should
indicate whether the bond issue in ques-
tion is under examination by the Service.
Acceptance and processing of the payment
by the Ogden Submission Processing Cen-
ter does not constitute a determination by
the Commissioner that the failure was not
caused by willful neglect. The determina-
tion of whether a failure was due to willful
neglect is made in accordance with the pro-
cedures set forth in section 4.
.05Interest. For purposes of section
3.01, interest accrues at the underpayment
rate under § 6621 beginning on the date the
correct rebate amount is due and ending on
the date ten days before it is paid. For this
purpose, a rebate amount is due on the date
that is 60 days after the computation date
to which the rebate amount relates.
.06Issue under examination. For pur-
poses of this revenue procedure, an issue
is under examination by the Service on the
date a letter opening an examination of the
issue is sent.
SECTION 4. PROCEDURES FOR
ESTABLISHING LACK OF WILLFUL
NEGLECT
.01 In determining whether a failure to
timely pay the correct rebate amount was
due to willful neglect, the Service will con-
sider the following factors:
(1) The unpaid rebate amount;
(2) The sophistication of the issuer;
(3) The length of the delay;
(4) The steps taken to comply, including
the steps taken after the discovery of the
failure to pay;
(5) The steps taken to prevent recur-
rence of a failure to pay;
(6) The nature of the failure;
(7) Any history of timely or late pay-
ments by the issuer; and
(8) Any other relevant information.
.02 If the Service does not notify the
issuer in writing within 90 days after re-
ceiving the explanation submitted in accor-
dance with section 3.04, the explanation is
accepted, and the issuer’s failure to timely
pay the rebate amount will be treated as not
due to willful neglect.
.03 If, based on the explanation sub-
mitted by the issuer, the Service is unable
to make a determination that the failure to
timely pay the rebate amount was not due
to willful neglect, the Service will notify
the issuer in writing within 90 days after
the Service’s receipt of the explanation and
late payment. The written notice will de-
scribe any additional information needed,
identify a contact person who is handling
the matter, and provide the issuer with a
reasonable period of not less than 21 days
to provide additional information.
.04 Generally, within 90 days of receiv-
ing the additional information requested,
the Service will notify the issuer in writ-
ing that either (1) the Service has deter-
mined that the failure to timely pay the re-
bate amount was not due to willful neglect
or (2) the Service is unable to make a deter-
mination that the failure to timely pay the
rebate amount was not due to willful ne-
glect.
.05 If the Service notifies the issuer un-
der section 4.04 that the Service is unable
to make a determination that the failure to
timely pay the rebate amount was not due
to willful neglect, the issuer will be enti-
tled, upon request, to a conference with the
Service.
.06 After conducting the conference
and reviewing any additional submissions
by the issuer, the Service will notify the
issuer in writing that either (1) the Service
has determined that the failure to timely
pay the rebate amount was not due to will-
ful neglect or (2) the information available
to the Service is insufficient for the Ser-
vice to find a lack of willful neglect. If the
Service is unable to find a lack of willful
July 11, 2005842005–28 I.R.B.

neglect, an examination of the bond issue
may be opened. If, however, an examina-
tion of the bond issue is not opened within
180 days after the date the Service’s no-
tification described in this section 4.06 is
sent,thentheissuer’sfailuretotimelypay
the rebate amount will be treated as not
due to willful neglect.
.07 For purposes of this section 4, a
notification in writing is made on the date
the written notification is sent.
SECTION 5. PROCEDURES
CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR
AN EXTENSION OF TIME OR A
WAIVER OF PENALTY
.01Extension of time to pay the late
payment amount. Prior to the expiration
of the 180-day period described in section
3.01(1), an issuer may request that the
Service grant it an extension of 180 days
to pay the late payment amount deter-
mined under section 3.01(1). The request
should be submitted to Internal Revenue
Service, ATTENTION: SE:T:GE:TEB:O,
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., PE–5T2,
Washington, D.C. 20224. The request
should include the explanation required
by section 3.04 and should address the
unusual circumstances upon which the
extension should be granted. Within 90
days after receiving a request for exten-
sion, the Service will notify the issuer in
writing whether the extension is approved.
If the Service does not notify the issuer
in writing within that 90-day period, the
issuer’s request for extension is approved.
If a request for extension is approved, and
payment is made within 180 days after the
expiration of the 180-day period, then the
late payment amount is the rebate amount
that the issuer failed to pay, plus interest,
as determined under section 3.01(1). If a
request for extension is not approved, the
issuer must pay either: (1) if within the
180-day period, the amount determined
under section 3.01(1); or (2) if after the
180-day period, the amount determined
under section 3.01(2).
.02Waiver of penalty. Within 180
days after the expiration of the 180-day
period described in section 3.01(1), an
issuer may request that the Service grant
it a waiver of the penalty described in
section 3.02. The request for a waiver of
penalty must be submitted to the Internal
Revenue Service, Ogden Submission Pro-
cessing Center, Ogden, Utah 84201, and
must be accompanied by payment of the
amount determined under section 3.01(2),
together with Form 8038–T (Arbitrage
Rebate, Yield Reduction and Penalty in
Lieu of Arbitrage Rebate). The request
for a waiver of penalty should include
the explanation required by section 3.04
and should address the unusual circum-
stances that justify waiver of the penalty.
The Ogden Submission Processing Center
will process the payment and immediately
forward the request to SE:T:GE:TEB:O.
Within 90 days after receiving a request
for a waiver of penalty, the Service will
notify the issuer in writing whether any
portion of the penalty is waived and, if
applicable, will promptly thereafter refund
to the issuer any amount so waived. If the
Service does not approve a waiver request
with respect to any portion of the penalty,
the issuer will be entitled, upon request, to
a conference with the Service. If a confer-
ence is held, then, within 30 days after the
conference, the Service will notify the is-
suer in writing whether any portion of the
penalty is waived and, if applicable, will
promptly thereafter refund to the issuer
anyamountsowaived.
.03Date of notification or refund.For
purposes of this section 5, a notification in
writing (or a refund) is made on the date
the written notification (or refund) is sent.
SECTION 6. EFFECT OF
CORRECTING A FAILURE TO
PAY REBATE
If an issuer satisfies the requirements
of this revenue procedure for correcting a
failure to timely pay a rebate amount un-
der § 148(f)(3) and § 1.148–3(g), the re-
bate amount will be treated as paid on the
computation date to which it relates. Any
interest or penalty amounts paid under this
revenue procedure are not treated as pay-
ments under § 1.148–3(d) for purposes of
computing the rebate amount. Acceptance
by the Service of a late payment amount
under this revenue procedure does not con-
stitute a determination by the Service that
the issuer paid a correct rebate amount as
required by § 148(f) and § 1.148–3.
SECTION 7. MODIFICATION OF REV.
PROC. 90–11
Rev. Proc. 90–11 is modified by chang-
ing all references to the Internal Revenue
Service Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylva-
nia in sections 3.02(5), 4.02(1)(c), 4.02(3),
and 5.02 of the revenue procedure to:
Internal Revenue Service
Ogden Submission Processing Center
Ogden, Utah 84201
SECTION 8. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 90–11, 1990–1 C.B. 469, is
modified in part.
SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure applies to dis-
coveries after July 11, 2005, of a failure to
timely pay the correct rebate amount un-
der § 148(f)(3) and §1.148–3(g) (or, with
respect to the modification of Rev. Proc.
90–11 made by section 7 of this revenue
procedure, § 1.148–1T initially published
on May 12, 1989, as part of T.D. 8252).
SECTION 10. PAPERWORK
REDUCTION ACT
The collection of information con-
tained in this revenue procedure has been
reviewed and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in accor-
dance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number
1545–1880.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a valid
OMB control number.
This revenue procedure contains a col-
lection of information requirement in sec-
tions 5.01 and 5.02. The purpose of the
collection of information is to enable the
Service to evaluate an issuer’s request for
a waiver of a penalty, or an extension of
time to make a late payment, in the case
of a failure by the issuer to timely pay the
correct rebate amount:
The likely respondents are state and lo-
cal governments.
The estimated total annual reporting
burden is: 3 hours.
2005–28 I.R.B.85July 11, 2005

The estimated annual burden per re-
spondent: 30 minutes.
The estimated number of respondents:
6.
The estimated annual frequency of re-
sponses: on occasion.
The collection of information contained
in section 3.04 of this revenue procedure
has been previously reviewed and ap-
proved by OMB under control number
1545–1219.
Books or records relating to a collection
of information must be retained as long
as their contents may become material in
the administration of any internal revenue
law. Generally tax returns and tax return
information are confidential, as required
by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal authors of this revenue
procedure are Lynn Kawecki of the Tax
Exempt Bond office of the Tax Exempt
and Government Entities (TE/GE) Divi-
sion and David White of the Office of Di-
vision Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt and Government Entities).
For further information regarding this rev-
enue procedure, contact Mr. Kawecki at
(202) 283–9782 (not a toll-free call).
July 11, 2005862005–28 I.R.B.

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
2005–28 I.R.B.iJuly 11, 2005

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–28
Announcements:
2005-46, 2005-27 I.R.B.63
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
Notices:
2005-48, 2005-27 I.R.B.9
2005-49, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-50, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-51, 2005-28 I.R.B.74
2005-52, 2005-28 I.R.B.75
Proposed Regulations:
REG-130241-04, 2005-27 I.R.B.18
Revenue Procedures:
2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
2005-36, 2005-28 I.R.B.78
2005-37, 2005-28 I.R.B.79
2005-38, 2005-28 I.R.B.81
2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
Revenue Rulings:
2005-38, 2005-27 I.R.B.6
2005-39, 2005-27 I.R.B.1
2005-40, 2005-27 I.R.B.4
2005-41, 2005-28 I.R.B.69
2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
Tax Conventions:
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
July 11, 2005ii2005–28 I.R.B.

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–28
Revenue Procedures:
90–11
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
Rev. Proc. 2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
Revenue Rulings:
82-29
Modified and clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
2005–28 I.R.B.iiiJuly 11, 2005
*U.S.Government PrintingOffice:2005—314–048/20013