17011004 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-cb083138b62984f0da40bc4c8025db5c17011004 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date

Tags:

Rule
802.50
Staff
Kristin Shaffer
Response/Comments

[Redacted],

We agree.

Best regards,

Kristin

Question

[Redacted],

We agree.

Best regards,

Kristin

-------------------------------------------

From: [Redacted]

Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 9:38:21 PM

To: [Redacted]

Cc: Berg, Karen E.; Whitehead, Nora; Walsh, Kathryn E.; Gillis, Diana L.

Subject: HSR Reportability Question

Hi all,

Apologies for the request right before the Thanksgiving holiday, but we were hoping to get your view before Friday, November 24.

We want to confirm that our interpretation of the sale of an asset located outside of U.S. territorial waters is not reportable for HSR purposes when it satisfies the 802.50 exemption:

Company A intends to sell Asset X (Company A’s interest in a platform used for oil and gas handling) to Company B.

Asset X is located outside of U.S. territorial waters (i.e., beyond 12 nautical miles from the U.S. coast). However, we understand that it is located in an exclusive economic zone that provides the US certain rights regarding the use of marine resources. No portion of Asset X extends into U.S. territorial waters and owners of Asset X are compensated on a tariff basis for product transported through Asset X. Asset X transports product via a lateral to another platform located outside of U.S. territorial waters and owned by a non‐party, which then transports the product via a pipeline (also owned by a non‐party) into U.S. territorial waters.

According to Informal Interpretation 1204004, only assets located within the U.S. territorial waters are considered to be U.S. assets. As a result, we believe Asset X would be considered a foreign asset for purposes of the HSR Act.

Therefore, under Section 802.50, the acquisition of Asset X would be exempt from reporting under the HSR Act because the interest Company B (the acquirer) would hold in Asset X generated less than $80.8 million sales in or into the U.S. in its last fiscal year.

Thanks very much,

[Redacted]

1
Haynes, Lanea
From: 	Shaffer, Kristin
Sent: 	Wednesday, November 22, 2017 9:42 AM
To:
Cc: 	HSRHelp
Subject: 	RE: HSR Reportability Question
,
We agree.
Best regards,
Kristin
Kristin Shaffer
Attorney
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
202‐326‐3434 | kshaffer@ftc.gov
-------------------------------------------
From:
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 9:38:21 PM
To: HSRHelp
Cc: Berg, Karen E.; Whitehead, Nora; Walsh, Kathryn E.; Gillis, Diana L.
Subject: HSR Reportability Question
Hi all,
Apologies for the request right before the Thanksgiving holiday, but we were hoping to get your view before Friday,
November 24.
We want to confirm that our interpretation of the sale of an asset located outside of U.S. territorial waters is not
reportable for HSR purposes when it satisfies the 802.50 exemption:
Company A intends to sell Asset X (Company A’s interest in a platform used for oil and gas handling) to Company B.
Asset X is located outside of U.S. territorial waters (i.e., beyond 12 nautical miles from the U.S. coast). However, we
understand that it is located in an exclusive economic zone that provides the US certain rights regarding the use of
marine resources. No portion of Asset X extends into U.S. territorial waters and owners of Asset X are compensated on a
tariff basis for product transported through Asset X. Asset X transports product via a lateral to another platform located
outside of U.S. territorial waters and owned by a non‐party, which then transports the product via a pipeline (also
owned by a non‐party) into U.S. territorial waters.
According to Informal Interpretation 1204004, only assets located within the U.S. territorial waters are considered to be
U.S. assets. As a result, we believe Asset X would be considered a foreign asset for purposes of the HSR Act.
Therefore, under Section 802.50, the acquisition of Asset X would be exempt from reporting under the HSR Act because
the interest Company B (the acquirer) would hold in Asset X generated less than $80.8 million sales in or into the U.S. in
its last fiscal year.
Complete printed PDF page 1

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.