us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-6c8b19a0d1b7bbcc63333254902b3b3d•0812008 Informal Interpretation
0812008 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-6c8b19a0d1b7bbcc63333254902b3b3d0812008 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From: (redacted)
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:39 AM
To: Verne, B. Michael
Subject: RE: HSR question
Please note that, with respect to the below, my analysis is as follows:
1. Formation of Newco ("N"): A and 8 must file but N need not file per Section 802.41 (ex. 1).
2. Acquisition of assets from C: Both N and C must file. The intraperson exemption (Section 802.30) does not apply since 8 does not control N (only 49% ownership) and, therefore, the fact that 8 and C have the same controlling equityholder is rendered irrelevant in the analysis.
Please let me know if you agree.
Thanks again
------------------------
From: (redacted)
Sent: Friday, December 19,2008 3:38 PM
To: 'Verne, B. Michael' Subject: RE: HSR question
As a follow up, please note that A will own 51 % of Newco and 8 will own 49%.
------------------------
From: (redacted)
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 3:07 PM
To: 'Verne, B. Michael' Subject: HSR question
Mr. Verne:
Sorry to bother you again but I have another question.
The question is whether two HSR filings are required or just one.
Here's the scenario. Parties A and 8 will each contribute approx. $100mm to form Newco, and Newco will then spend $200mm+ to acquire assets from C. Note that 8 and C are "sister" entities, each publicly traded, but wI the same controlling equityholder. The two transactions would close substantially concurrently.
Again, thank you in advance.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.