State Of Washington, Respondent V. Chris Ann Wickham, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 80769-2-I
)
Respondent, )
)
v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION
)
CHRIS ANN WICKHAM, )
)
Appellant. )
PER CURIAM — Chris Wickham appeals the judgment and sentence imposed
following her conviction for felony driving under the influence. She contends that
the trial court waived all discretionary legal financial obligations (LFOs), but that
the judgment and sentence requires her to pay the costs of supervision by the
Department of Corrections (DOC). The State concedes that this condition should
be stricken because Wickham was indigent, and the sentencing court clearly
intended to impose only mandatory legal financial obligations. See State v.
Lundstrom, 6 Wn. App. 2d 388, 396 n.3, 429 P.3d 1116 (2018) (costs of
supervision are discretionary); State v. Dillon, 12 Wn. App. 2d 133, 152, 456 P.3d
1199 (2020) (striking DOC supervision fee where “[t]he record demonstrate[d]

No. 80769-2-I/2
2
that the trial court intended to impose only mandatory LFOs”). We accept the
State’s concession, and remand to the trial court to strike the supervision fee.