State Of Washington, Respondent V. Larry Joe Berniard, Appellant

70357-9Washctapp27 mag 2014

Testo completo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
LARRY JOE BERNIARD,
Appellant.
No. 70357-9-1
DIVISION ONE
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: 	May 27, 2014
Per Curiam. 	Larry Berniard appeals from his conviction for three counts of
unlawful delivery of cocaine. 	Berniard's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion
to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review.
Pursuant to State v. Theobald. 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), the motion to
withdraw must:
[1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that
might arguably support the appeal. 	[2] A copy of counsel's brief should
be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points
that he chooses; [4] the court-not counsel-then proceeds, after a full
examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly
frivolous.
State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744).
This procedure has been followed. 	Berniard's counsel on appeal filed a brief
with the motion to withdraw. 	Berniard was served with a copy of the brief and
informed of the right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. 	He did not
file a statement of additional grounds.
No. 70357-9-1/2
The facts are accurately set forth in counsel's brief in support of the motion to
withdraw. 	The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has independently
reviewed the entire record. 	The court specifically considered the following potential
issues raised by counsel:
1. Whether sufficient evidence supported Berniard's convictions for delivery of
cocaine?
2. Whether the trial court erred in failing to give Berniard's proposed
reasonable doubt instruction?
The potential issues are wholly frivolous. 	Counsel's motion to withdraw is
granted and the appeal is dismissed.
For the Court:
^.ckuR, 	'
S 	too
— 	r^cr
ni~'
~n '•-
— ~> •
ZS. 	rr: J>
CO 	~, U'i
XT 	o ™
co 	-•-•"-
3=»
—<

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.