State Of Washington, Respondent V. Donnell Timothy Williams, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
DONNELL TIMOTHY WILLIAMS,
Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 69138-4-1
DIVISION ONE
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: 	MAR 0 4 2013
PER CURIAM. 	Donnell Williams challenges his guilty plea to third degree
assault and unlawful imprisonment. 	His court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to
withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review.
Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), the motion to
withdraw must:
(1) be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might
arguably support the appeal. 	(2) A copy of counsel's brief should be
furnished the indigent and (3) time allowed him to raise any points that he
chooses; (4) the court-not counsel-then proceeds, after a full examination
of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.
Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders, 386 U.S. at 744).
This procedure has been followed. 	Williams's counsel on appeal filed a brief with
the motion to withdraw. 	Williams was served with a copy of the brief and informed of his
right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. 	Williams did file a
supplemental brief.

No. 69138-4-1/2
The material facts are accurately set forth in counsel's brief in support of the
motion to withdraw. 	The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has
independently reviewed the entire record. 	The court specifically considered the
following potential issues raised by counsel:
(1) Did the trial court accurately calculate Williams's offender score?
(2) Was Williams denied effective assistance of counsel?
(3) Was Williams the victim of institutional racism?
(4) Was Williams denied his right to proceed prose?
The court also considered the following issues raised by Williams in his
statement of additional grounds on review:
(1) Did Williams receive credit for jail time served in Wisconsin?
The issues raised by Williams and his counsel are wholly frivolous. 	The motion
to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
For the court:
2