Lisa M. Murray v. Fairfax County School Board

0227054Vactapp

Testo completo

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata
LISA M. MURRAY
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 0227-05-4 	PER CURIAM
AUGUST 16, 2005
FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Lisa M. Murray, pro se, on brief).
(Michael N. Salveson; Hunton & Williams LLP, on brief), for
appellee.
Lisa M. Murray (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation
Commission affirming the deputy commissioner’s findings that (1) she failed to prove she
sustained a compensable injury by accident, occupational disease, or ordinary disease of life; and
(2) to the extent that she sought to relitigate the same issues involving the same employer that
were previously decided in VWC File No. 210-58-33, the claim was barred by res judicata.1 We
have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Murray
v. Fairfax (County of) School Board, VWC File No. 216-20-34 (Dec. 28, 2004). We dispense
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
1 The commission also found that claimant’s petition to reopen the record for the
consideration of after-discovered evidence was untimely and that even if timely, claimant failed
to meet the requirements for the consideration of such evidence. Claimant did not challenge that
finding on appeal, and we do not consider it. In addition, in summarily affirming the
commission’s decision, we do not consider claimant’s argument that she was incompetent to
defend her claims, thereby tolling the statute of limitations, because she did not raise that
argument before the commission. See Rule 5A:18.
- 2 -
with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.