CourtListener 10099196•Lee Alford v. Yuvraj Khullar
Testo completo
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-24-00170-CV
__________________
LEE ALFORD, Appellant
V.
YUVRAJ KHULLAR, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
Brazos County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 6312-B
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 18, 2024, Lee Alford filed a notice of appeal pertaining to a final
judgment in Trial Cause Number 6312-B. 1 But after perfecting his appeal Alford
failed to file a brief.
1
Alford filed his appeal in the Tenth District Court of Appeals. [But in March
2024, the Texas Supreme Court signed a docket-equalization order and transferred
the appeal to the Ninth District Court of Appeals to equalize the appellate dockets.
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 73.001.
1
On July 12, 2024, the Clerk of the Ninth Court of Appeals notified the parties
that Alford had not filed a brief and advised the parties that his appeal would be
submitted without briefs unless by July 22, 2024, Alford had submitted a brief and
a motion to extend the deadline in which he had to file his brief. We warned Alford
that if the Court submitted his appeal without briefs that the Court could dismiss his
appeal for want of prosecution.
On August 5, 2024, the Clerk notified the parties that on August 26, 2024, the
appeal would be submitted to the Court without briefs and without oral argument.
See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Because Alford has not filed a brief in his appeal assigning
any error to any of the trial court’s rulings, we dismiss Alford’s appeal for want of
prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on August 26, 2024
Opinion Delivered August 29, 2024
Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
2
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.