CourtListener 10014873•Sebastion Eleazar Perkins v. the State of Texas
Sebastion Eleazar Perkins v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10014873Txctapp924 lug 2024
Testo completo
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
________________
NO. 09-23-00333-CR
________________
SABASTION ELEAZAR PERKINS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 356th District Court
Hardin County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 27654
________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Sabastion Eleazar Perkins was charged with sexual assault, a
second-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.011. A jury found Perkins
guilty and assessed his punishment at sixteen years of confinement. This appeal
followed.
Perkins’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel’s
professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See
1
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1978). After Perkins’s counsel filed his brief, we granted an extension
of time for Perkins to file a pro se response. Perkins has not filed a response.
Upon receiving an Anders brief, this Court must conduct a full examination
of the record to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988) (citing Anders, 386 U.S. at 744). We have reviewed the entire
appellate record and counsel’s brief and have found no reversible error, and we
conclude the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-
28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment
of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511
(Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1
AFFIRMED.
JAY WRIGHT
Justice
Submitted on June 6, 2024
Opinion Delivered July 24, 2024
Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
1
Perkins may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for
discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
2
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.